linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Waxhead <waxhead@online.no>
To: Chris Murphy <lists@colorremedies.com>
Cc: Btrfs BTRFS <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Btrfs scrub failure for raid 6 kernel 4.3
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2015 19:31:59 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5684231F.7040700@online.no> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJCQCtSZHpdLhkbSMfJi0RmV9Sa1_h4ea8yJzJMc3CxoLGhK+A@mail.gmail.com>

Chris Murphy wrote:
> Well all the generations on all devices are now the same, and so are
> the chunk trees. I haven't looked at them in detail to see if there
> are any discrepancies among them.
>
> If you don't care much for this file system, then you could try btrfs
> check --repair, using btrfs-progs 4.3.1 or integration branch. I have
> no idea where btrfsck repair is at with raid56.
>
> On the one hand, corruption should be fixed by scrub. But scrub fails
> with a kernel trace. Maybe btrfs check --repair can fix the tree block
> corruption since scrub can't, and then if that corruption is fixed,
> possibly scrub will work.
>
I could not care less about this particular filesystem as I wrote in the 
original post. It's just for having some fun with btrfs. What I find 
troublesome is that corrupting one (or even two) drives in a Raid6 
config fails. Granted the filesystem "works" e.g. I can mount it and 
access files, but I get a input/output error on a file on this 
filesystem and btrfs only shows warning (not errors) on device sdg1 
where the csum failed.
A raid6 setup should work fine even if two missing disks (or in this 
case chunks of data) is missing and even if I don't care about this 
filesystem I care about btrfs getting stable ;) so if I can help I'll 
keep this filesystem around for a little longer!


  reply	other threads:[~2015-12-30 18:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-27 13:59 Btrfs scrub failure for raid 6 kernel 4.3 Waxhead
2015-12-27 18:29 ` Chris Murphy
2015-12-27 23:06   ` Waxhead
2015-12-28  1:48     ` Duncan
2015-12-28  2:04       ` Waxhead
2015-12-28  2:18         ` Chris Murphy
2015-12-28 21:08           ` Waxhead
2015-12-28 21:23             ` Chris Murphy
     [not found]               ` <5681BDD0.1060407@online.no>
2015-12-29  0:29                 ` Chris Murphy
2015-12-29 20:19                   ` Waxhead
2015-12-30  4:22                     ` Chris Murphy
2015-12-30 18:31                       ` Waxhead [this message]
2015-12-30 19:08                         ` Waxhead
2015-12-28  4:02         ` Duncan
2015-12-28 21:17           ` Waxhead
2015-12-28 21:50             ` Chris Murphy
2015-12-28  0:39   ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2015-12-28  0:58     ` Chris Murphy
2015-12-28  1:09       ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2015-12-28  1:23         ` Chris Murphy
2015-12-28  1:31           ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2015-12-28  2:16             ` Duncan
2015-12-28  1:21 ` Duncan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5684231F.7040700@online.no \
    --to=waxhead@online.no \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lists@colorremedies.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).