From: Psalle <psalleetsile@gmail.com>
To: Alphazo <alphazo@gmail.com>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Purposely using btrfs RAID1 in degraded mode ?
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 17:34:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <568BF078.8060303@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHJqNbyXUfzscHteqrQtxJdYKToDNv7_Hw9tVpPuNJYwe=NHxw@mail.gmail.com>
Hello Alphazo,
I am a mere btrfs user, but given the discussions I regularly see here
about difficulties with degraded filesystems I wouldn't rely on this
(yet?) as a regular work strategy, even if it's supposed to work.
If you're familiar with git, perhaps git-annex could be an alternative.
-Psalle.
On 04/01/16 18:00, Alphazo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> My picture library today lies on an external hard drive that I sync on
> a regular basis with a couple of servers and other external drives.
> I'm interested by the on-the-fly checksum brought by btrfs and would
> like to get your opinion on the following unusual use case that I have
> tested:
> - Create a btrfs with the two drives with RAID1
> - When at home I can work with the two drives connected so I can enjoy
> the self-healing feature if a bit goes mad so I only backup perfect
> copies to my backup servers.
> - When not at home I only bring one external drive and manually mount
> it in degraded mode so I can continue working on my pictures while
> still having checksum error detection (but not correction).
> - When coming back home I can plug-back the seconde drive and initiate
> a scrub or balance to get the second drive duplicated.
>
> I have tested the above use case with a couple of USB flash drive and
> even used btrfs over dm-crypt partitions and it seemed to work fine
> but I wanted to get some advices from the community if this is really
> a bad practice that should not be used on the long run. Is there any
> limitation/risk to read/write to/from a degraded filesystem knowing it
> will be re-synced later?
>
> Thanks
> alphazo
>
> PS: I have also investigated the RAID1 on a single drive with two
> partitions but I cannot afford the half capacity resulting from that
> approach.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-05 16:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-04 17:00 Purposely using btrfs RAID1 in degraded mode ? Alphazo
2016-01-04 17:41 ` Chris Murphy
2016-01-06 12:30 ` Alphazo
2016-01-09 10:08 ` Duncan
2016-01-11 22:17 ` Alphazo
2016-01-05 16:34 ` Psalle [this message]
2016-01-06 12:34 ` Alphazo
2016-01-07 12:57 ` Psalle
2016-01-07 13:09 ` Alphazo
2016-01-07 17:34 ` Sree Harsha Totakura
2016-01-11 14:25 ` Psalle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=568BF078.8060303@gmail.com \
--to=psalleetsile@gmail.com \
--cc=alphazo@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).