From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ns.bouton.name ([109.74.195.142]:39927 "EHLO mail.bouton.name" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757409AbcAJWcY (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Jan 2016 17:32:24 -0500 Subject: Re: 6TB partition, Data only 2TB - aka When you haven't hit the "usual" problem To: "cheater00 ." , Russell Coker References: <20160109210429.GD6060@carfax.org.uk> <201601101716.43204.russell@coker.com.au> Cc: Btrfs BTRFS From: Lionel Bouton Message-ID: <5692DBF6.6010706@bouton.name> Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2016 23:32:22 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Le 10/01/2016 23:24, cheater00 . a écrit : >> Please test this with the common mail server software, EG Postfix, Exim, >> Procmail, Maildrop, Dovecot, etc. The BTRFS bug as described won't cause data >> loss with any of them. > [...] > because the sender only retries for 60 seconds and then throws away > the message forever. There you go, loss of data and service. What Russel was trying to say is that it's not how SMTP (and in general any system/protocol where data is important) works. If the sender behaves like this he is the one with a defective system. Lionel