From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: "cheater00 ." <cheater00@gmail.com>,
Btrfs BTRFS <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Crash on btrfs check
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 10:31:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56985A05.4050506@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+9GZUjeXhvb0xHCrfxg3F+Os55EzSq+66009EAbqztwQM-VVQ@mail.gmail.com>
cheater00 . wrote on 2016/01/15 03:25 +0100:
> Hi guys,
> I have a particularly full btrfs (nearly all of 6TB used on a disk).
> This is different than the fs I've experienced the resize bug on
> recently.
>
> btrfs check crashes on it:
>
> # btrfs check /dev/sdb1
> Checking filesystem on /dev/sdb1
> UUID: 95db96b3-96fe-4a12-810c-27c1dbd30b0d
> checking extents
> extent_io.c:543: __alloc_extent_buffer: Assertion failed.
This means memory allocation failed.
And considering the size of FS, and how btrfsck caches metadata (btrfsck
will cache all extent info during extent tree check),
it just mean your memory is not big enough to cache them all.
It's already an known problem.
Workaround is to increase your swap size until btrfsck can continue
without segfault.
Thanks,
Qu
> btrfs[0x80558a3]
> btrfs[0x8092971]
> btrfs(alloc_extent_buffer+0xb7)[0x8093494]
> btrfs(btrfs_find_create_tree_block+0x2b)[0x8083785]
> btrfs(read_tree_block+0x32)[0x808503f]
> btrfs(read_node_slot+0x63)[0x807f430]
> btrfs(btrfs_search_slot+0xb47)[0x8081a28]
> btrfs(btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0xd6)[0x808a0df]
> btrfs[0x806c13a]
> btrfs[0x806d95e]
> btrfs[0x806e5cb]
> btrfs(cmd_check+0x10f8)[0x8070fee]
> btrfs(main+0x14d)[0x8055acb]
> /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf3)[0xb74f0a83]
> btrfs[0x8055af8]
>
>
>
> $ uname -a
> Linux SX20S 4.4.0-040400-generic #201601101930 SMP Mon Jan 11 00:49:33
> UTC 2016 i686 i686 i686 GNU/Linux
>
> $ btrfs --version
> btrfs-progs v4.3
>
> # btrfs fi show /dev/sdb1
> Label: 'A' uuid: 95db96b3-96fe-4a12-810c-27c1dbd30b0d
> Total devices 1 FS bytes used 5.41TiB
> devid 1 size 5.46TiB used 5.46TiB path /dev/sdb1
>
> # btrfs-show-super /dev/sdb1
> superblock: bytenr=65536, device=/dev/sdb1
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> csum 0x116b97f0 [match]
> bytenr 65536
> flags 0x1
> ( WRITTEN )
> magic _BHRfS_M [match]
> fsid 95db96b3-96fe-4a12-810c-27c1dbd30b0d
> label P
> generation 128737
> root 43384832
> sys_array_size 226
> chunk_root_generation 106809
> root_level 1
> chunk_root 20971520
> chunk_root_level 1
> log_root 0
> log_root_transid 0
> log_root_level 0
> total_bytes 6001173463040
> bytes_used 5948325072896
> sectorsize 4096
> nodesize 16384
> leafsize 16384
> stripesize 4096
> root_dir 6
> num_devices 1
> compat_flags 0x0
> compat_ro_flags 0x0
> incompat_flags 0x61
> ( MIXED_BACKREF |
> BIG_METADATA |
> EXTENDED_IREF )
> csum_type 0
> csum_size 4
> cache_generation 128737
> uuid_tree_generation 128737
> dev_item.uuid e2a8e731-b28c-437b-8cb9-583bb96aea5f
> dev_item.fsid 95db96b3-96fe-4a12-810c-27c1dbd30b0d [match]
> dev_item.type 0
> dev_item.total_bytes 6001173463040
> dev_item.bytes_used 6001173463040
> dev_item.io_align 4096
> dev_item.io_width 4096
> dev_item.sector_size 4096
> dev_item.devid 1
> dev_item.dev_group 0
> dev_item.seek_speed 0
> dev_item.bandwidth 0
> dev_item.generation 0
>
> # btrfs fi usage A
> Overall:
> Device size: 5.46TiB
> Device allocated: 5.46TiB
> Device unallocated: 0.00B
> Device missing: 0.00B
> Used: 5.42TiB
> Free (estimated): 35.41GiB (min: 35.41GiB)
> Data ratio: 1.00
> Metadata ratio: 2.00
> Global reserve: 512.00MiB (used: 0.00B)
>
> Data,single: Size:5.43TiB, Used:5.40TiB
> /dev/sdb1 5.43TiB
>
> Metadata,single: Size:8.00MiB, Used:0.00B
> /dev/sdb1 8.00MiB
>
> Metadata,DUP: Size:12.50GiB, Used:11.22GiB
> /dev/sdb1 25.00GiB
>
> System,single: Size:4.00MiB, Used:0.00B
> /dev/sdb1 4.00MiB
>
> System,DUP: Size:8.00MiB, Used:608.00KiB
> /dev/sdb1 16.00MiB
>
> Unallocated:
> /dev/sdb1 0.00B
>
> dmesg is showing a lot of stuff like this, but it only started doing
> this when I upgraded to linux 4.4, whereas before on 4.3 this didn't
> happen:
>
> [56319.486446] BTRFS critical (device sdb1): entry offset
> 6102519574528, bytes 20480, bitmap no
> [56319.486447] BTRFS critical (device sdb1): entry offset
> 6102527688704, bytes 24576, bitmap no
> [56319.486448] BTRFS critical (device sdb1): entry offset
> 6102528040960, bytes 8192, bitmap no
> [56319.486450] BTRFS critical (device sdb1): entry offset
> 6102536241152, bytes 8192, bitmap no
> [56319.486451] BTRFS critical (device sdb1): entry offset
> 6102561120256, bytes 8192, bitmap no
> [56319.486452] BTRFS critical (device sdb1): entry offset
> 6102590480384, bytes 4096, bitmap no
> [56319.486453] BTRFS critical (device sdb1): entry offset
> 6102620999680, bytes 12288, bitmap no
> [56319.486454] BTRFS critical (device sdb1): entry offset
> 6102633365504, bytes 16384, bitmap no
> [56319.486455] BTRFS info (device sdb1): block group has cluster?: no
> [56319.486456] BTRFS info (device sdb1): 1 blocks of free space at or
> bigger than bytes is
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-15 2:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-15 2:25 Crash on btrfs check cheater00 .
2016-01-15 2:31 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2016-01-15 2:36 ` Qu Wenruo
2016-01-15 13:56 ` cheater00 .
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56985A05.4050506@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=cheater00@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).