From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:45039 "EHLO userp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750917AbcBMCJG (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Feb 2016 21:09:06 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Introduce device delete by devid To: dsterba@suse.cz, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org References: <1444144764-2384-1-git-send-email-anand.jain@oracle.com> <20160212182207.GJ4374@twin.jikos.cz> From: Anand Jain Message-ID: <56BE903C.9030805@oracle.com> Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2016 10:09:00 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160212182207.GJ4374@twin.jikos.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 02/13/2016 02:22 AM, David Sterba wrote: > On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 11:19:17PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote: >> The operation of device replace and device delete follows same steps >> upto some depths, however they don't share codes. >> This set of enhancement will help device replace and device delete to >> share codes. >> And at the end add support to delete device using devid. > > I'd like to get this rolling again, do you have an updated branch? I'm > not sure what's the latest status of the > 'number of devices vs raid > constraints' problem. Qu did some patches, I hope either of you can let > me know. Thanks. Hi Dave, Qu patch is required with my patch set titled 'btrfs: Hot spare and Auto replace' I can send that again. pls let me know. However I think you are looking for the patch set 'Introduce device delete by devid' here these patch does not depend on Qu patches. I have sent them again in a separate thread. Thanks, Anand