From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:23762 "EHLO userp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754694AbcBPJNp (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Feb 2016 04:13:45 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/15] btrfs: use existing device constraints table btrfs_raid_array To: David Sterba , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org References: <1294a3215cb0e28a81c33ed1b8921aae95043619.1455556900.git.dsterba@suse.com> From: Anand Jain Message-ID: <56C2E842.5010305@oracle.com> Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 17:13:38 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1294a3215cb0e28a81c33ed1b8921aae95043619.1455556900.git.dsterba@suse.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: yep required optimization. Deleting from my todo list. Reviewed-by: Anand Jain On 02/16/2016 01:34 AM, David Sterba wrote: > We should avoid duplicating the device constraints, let's use the > btrfs_raid_array in btrfs_check_raid_min_devices. > > Signed-off-by: David Sterba > --- > fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 23 +++++++++-------------- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c > index a67249582a6f..8fee24f92574 100644 > --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c > +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c > @@ -1730,6 +1730,7 @@ static int btrfs_check_raid_min_devices(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, > { > u64 all_avail; > unsigned seq; > + int i; > > do { > seq = read_seqbegin(&fs_info->profiles_lock); > @@ -1739,22 +1740,16 @@ static int btrfs_check_raid_min_devices(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, > fs_info->avail_metadata_alloc_bits; > } while (read_seqretry(&fs_info->profiles_lock, seq)); > > - if ((all_avail & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID10) && num_devices < 4) { > - return BTRFS_ERROR_DEV_RAID10_MIN_NOT_MET; > - } > - > - if ((all_avail & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1) && num_devices < 2) { > - return BTRFS_ERROR_DEV_RAID1_MIN_NOT_MET; > - } > + for (i = 0; i < BTRFS_NR_RAID_TYPES; i++) { > + if (!(all_avail & btrfs_raid_group[i])) > + continue; > > - if ((all_avail & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID5) && > - fs_info->fs_devices->rw_devices < 2) { > - return BTRFS_ERROR_DEV_RAID5_MIN_NOT_MET; > - } > + if (num_devices < btrfs_raid_array[i].devs_min) { > + int ret = btrfs_raid_mindev_error[i]; > > - if ((all_avail & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID6) && > - fs_info->fs_devices->rw_devices < 3) { > - return BTRFS_ERROR_DEV_RAID6_MIN_NOT_MET; > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + } > } > > return 0; >