From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
To: fdmanana@gmail.com
Cc: "linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: BZ#101951, Overlayfs on top of btrfs causes kernel oops + freeze
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 16:17:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56C34BA5.8040407@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL3q7H7YYf0ntQiF4A1FQXYvRxgprQORoF-8jFe3i5T-=ELzzQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 16/02/16 16:11, Filipe Manana wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 4:08 PM, Colin Ian King
> <colin.king@canonical.com> wrote:
>> On 16/02/16 15:51, Filipe Manana wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 3:38 PM, Colin Ian King
>>> <colin.king@canonical.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi there,
>>>>
>>>> bug: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101951 and also
>>>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1532145
>>>>
>>>> Commit 4bacc9c9234c7c8eec44f5ed4e960d9f96fa0f01 ("overlayfs: Make f_path
>>>> always point to the overlay and f_inode to the underlay") resulted in an
>>>> issue when using a combination of btrfs and overlayfs. This is
>>>> noticeable when doing a fsync() on a file in a chroot with overlayfs on
>>>> top of btrfs; we hit a kernel oops in btrfs_sync_file() on
>>>> atomic_inc(&root->log_batch) because root is NULL.
>>>>
>>>> I've debugged this further and found that in btrfs_sync_file():
>>>>
>>>> struct inode *inode = d_inode(dentry);
>>>>
>>>> does not return the inode I expected when using the stacked overlay fs,
>>>> where as:
>>>>
>>>> struct inode *inode = file_inode(file);
>>>>
>>>> does.
>>>
>>> See the discussion at
>>> https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org/msg48131.html
>>>
>>> You can get along with file_inode() in btrfs_sync_file(), but not
>>> later the fsync code path where we traverse the hierarchy up using
>>> dentries.
>>> More details on that thread.
>>
>> Ah, good. So was there any resolution on a way forward for a fix?
>
> Nop.
>
OK, so chroots don't work, that's a bit of a show stopper :-/
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> However, I'm not well at all well versed in btrfs, so I am not confident
>>>> this is a actually correct. Any comments?
>>>>
>>>> Colin
>>>> --
>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
>>>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-16 16:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-16 15:38 BZ#101951, Overlayfs on top of btrfs causes kernel oops + freeze Colin Ian King
2016-02-16 15:51 ` Filipe Manana
2016-02-16 16:08 ` Colin Ian King
2016-02-16 16:11 ` Filipe Manana
2016-02-16 16:17 ` Colin Ian King [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56C34BA5.8040407@canonical.com \
--to=colin.king@canonical.com \
--cc=fdmanana@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).