From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Cc: <fstests@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] fstests: Add support to check btrfs sysfs features
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 15:53:44 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56CD6188.7000407@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL3q7H5Vii4TVT9TMsnGMk1dMzF=Z69e-_0m6yE+n5JSgT8_Rw@mail.gmail.com>
Filipe Manana wrote on 2016/02/24 07:27 +0000:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 6:35 AM, Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>> Btrfs has its sysfs interface showing what features current kernel/btrfs
>> module support.
>>
>> Add _require_btrfs_kernel_feature() to check such interface.
>
>
> I think you sent the wrong patch. This doesn't add such a function and
> the changes are exactly the same as in:
>
> [PATCH 1/5] fstests: rename _require_btrfs to _require_btrfs_subcommand
Oh, this is one old and deprecated patch.
I forgot to cleanup the dir...
Please ignore this one.
The other one, "[PATCH 1/5] fstests: rename _require_btrfs to
_require_btrfs_subcommand" is the correct one.
As fstests already provide _btrfs_require_fs_feature().
I'll send the patchset.
Thanks,
Qu
>
>>
>> Also rename _require_btrfs() to _require_btrfs_subcommand() to avoid
>> confusion.
>
> So if there's a dedicated patch to do that already (the one I
> mentioned above), why do it here again? (and should be a separate
> patch anyway, since it's unrelated)
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
>> ---
>> common/rc | 2 +-
>> tests/btrfs/004 | 2 +-
>> tests/btrfs/048 | 1 +
>> tests/btrfs/059 | 1 +
>> 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/common/rc b/common/rc
>> index af16c81..ff57862 100644
>> --- a/common/rc
>> +++ b/common/rc
>> @@ -2706,7 +2706,7 @@ _require_deletable_scratch_dev_pool()
>> }
>>
>> # We check for btrfs and (optionally) features of the btrfs command
>> -_require_btrfs()
>> +_require_btrfs_subcommand()
>> {
>> cmd=$1
>> _require_command "$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG" btrfs
>> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/004 b/tests/btrfs/004
>> index 905770a..2ce628e 100755
>> --- a/tests/btrfs/004
>> +++ b/tests/btrfs/004
>> @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ _supported_fs btrfs
>> _supported_os Linux
>> _require_scratch
>> _require_no_large_scratch_dev
>> -_require_btrfs inspect-internal
>> +_require_btrfs_subcommand inspect-internal
>> _require_command "/usr/sbin/filefrag" filefrag
>>
>> rm -f $seqres.full
>> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/048 b/tests/btrfs/048
>> index c2cb4a6..d15346a 100755
>> --- a/tests/btrfs/048
>> +++ b/tests/btrfs/048
>> @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ _supported_os Linux
>> _require_test
>> _require_scratch
>> _require_btrfs "property"
>> +_require_btrfs_subcommand "property"
>>
>> send_files_dir=$TEST_DIR/btrfs-test-$seq
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/059 b/tests/btrfs/059
>> index b9a6ef4..6e7f7ee 100755
>> --- a/tests/btrfs/059
>> +++ b/tests/btrfs/059
>> @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ _supported_os Linux
>> _require_test
>> _require_scratch
>> _require_btrfs "property"
>> +_require_btrfs_subcommand "property"
>>
>> rm -f $seqres.full
>>
>> --
>> 2.7.1
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-24 7:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-24 6:35 [PATCH v2 0/5] Btrfs in-band de-duplication tests cases Qu Wenruo
2016-02-24 6:35 ` [PATCH 1/5] fstests: Add support to check btrfs sysfs features Qu Wenruo
2016-02-24 7:27 ` Filipe Manana
2016-02-24 7:53 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2016-02-24 6:35 ` [PATCH 1/5] fstests: rename _require_btrfs to _require_btrfs_subcommand Qu Wenruo
2016-02-24 6:35 ` [PATCH 2/5] fstests: btrfs: Add basic test for btrfs in-band de-duplication Qu Wenruo
2016-02-24 6:35 ` [PATCH 3/5] fstests: btrfs: Add testcase for btrfs dedup enable disable race test Qu Wenruo
2016-02-24 6:35 ` [PATCH 4/5] fstests: btrfs: Add per inode dedup flag test Qu Wenruo
2016-02-24 6:35 ` [PATCH 5/5] fstests: btrfs: Test inband dedup with balance Qu Wenruo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56CD6188.7000407@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=fdmanana@gmail.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).