linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: <dsterba@suse.cz>, <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] btrfs-find-root enhancement for chunk tree corrupted fs
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 08:37:59 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56CE4CE7.3020300@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160224123806.GC23746@twin.jikos.cz>



David Sterba wrote on 2016/02/24 13:38 +0100:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 02:59:52PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>> Before this patchset, btrfs-find-root needs valid chunk tree from the
>> fs.
>> However for chunk root corrupted case, btrfs-find-root is of no use due
>> to above limitation.
>>
>> This patchset will allow open_ctree_fs_info() to return a fs_info
>> without any valid tree root, but system chunk map from superblock only.
>> And modify btrfs-find-root along with some infrastructure to do chunk
>> root search.
>>
>> Also fix an old bug where btrfs-find-root will always skip the first
>> chunk, with its corresponding regression test.
>>
>> This also provides the basis for later "btrfsck --chunk-root" and faster
>> chunk-recovery enhancement.
>>
>> Qu Wenruo (5):
>>    btrfs: volume: Fix a bug causing btrfs-find-root to skip first chunk
>>    btrfs: Allow open_ctree to return fs_info even chunk tree is corrupted
>>    btrfs: Add support for tree block operations on fs_info without roots.
>>    btrfs: find-root: Allow btrfs-find-root to search chunk root even
>>      chunk     root is corrupted
>>    btrfs: misc-test: Add regression test for find-root gives empty result
>
> All applied, with minor adjustments. I'm not going to point them out
> in the mails, please make a diff against your branch to see.
>
>
Thanks for the modification.
It's completely OK.

Thanks,
Qu



      reply	other threads:[~2016-02-25  0:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-22  6:59 [PATCH 0/5] btrfs-find-root enhancement for chunk tree corrupted fs Qu Wenruo
2016-02-22  6:59 ` [PATCH 1/5] btrfs-progs: volume: Fix a bug causing btrfs-find-root to skip first chunk Qu Wenruo
2016-02-22  6:59 ` [PATCH 2/5] btrfs-progs: Allow open_ctree to return fs_info even chunk tree is corrupted Qu Wenruo
2016-02-22  6:59 ` [PATCH 3/5] btrfs-progs: Add support for tree block operations on fs_info without roots Qu Wenruo
2016-02-22  6:59 ` [PATCH 4/5] btrfs-progs: find-root: Allow btrfs-find-root to search chunk root even chunk root is corrupted Qu Wenruo
2016-02-22  6:59 ` [PATCH 5/5] btrfs-progs: misc-test: Add regression test for find-root gives empty result Qu Wenruo
2016-02-24 12:10   ` David Sterba
2016-02-25  0:36     ` Qu Wenruo
2016-02-22  7:24 ` [PATCH 0/5] btrfs-find-root enhancement for chunk tree corrupted fs Qu Wenruo
2016-02-24 12:38 ` David Sterba
2016-02-25  0:37   ` Qu Wenruo [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56CE4CE7.3020300@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).