From: "Holger Hoffstätte" <holger.hoffstaette@googlemail.com>
To: "Austin S. Hemmelgarn" <ahferroin7@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Stray 4k extents with slow buffered writes
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 22:50:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56D8B1C2.1040604@googlemail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56D8A2D4.2010907@gmail.com>
On 03/03/16 21:47, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote:
>> $mount | grep sdf
>> /dev/sdf1 on /mnt/usb type btrfs (rw,relatime,space_cache=v2,subvolid=5,subvol=/)
> Do you still see the same behavior with the old space_cache format?
> This appears to be an issue of space management and allocation, so
> this may be playing a part.
I just did the clear_cache,space_cache=v1 dance. Now a download with
bandwidth-limit=1M, dirty_expire=20s, commit=30 and *no* autodefrag
first ended up looking like this:
$filefrag -ek linux-4.5-rc6.tar.xz
Filesystem type is: 9123683e
File size of linux-4.5-rc6.tar.xz is 88362576 (86292 blocks of 1024 bytes)
ext: logical_offset: physical_offset: length: expected: flags:
0: 0.. 7427: 227197920.. 227205347: 7428:
1: 7428.. 33027: 227205348.. 227230947: 25600:
2: 33028.. 53011: 227271164.. 227291147: 19984: 227230948:
3: 53012.. 72995: 227291148.. 227311131: 19984:
4: 72996.. 86291: 227311132.. 227324427: 13296: last,eof
linux-4.5-rc6.tar.xz: 2 extents found
Yay! But wait, there's more!
$sync
$filefrag -ek linux-4.5-rc6.tar.xz
Filesystem type is: 9123683e
File size of linux-4.5-rc6.tar.xz is 88362576 (86292 blocks of 1024 bytes)
ext: logical_offset: physical_offset: length: expected: flags:
0: 0.. 7423: 227197920.. 227205343: 7424:
1: 7424.. 7427: 227169600.. 227169603: 4: 227205344:
2: 7428.. 33023: 227205348.. 227230943: 25596: 227169604:
3: 33024.. 33027: 227169604.. 227169607: 4: 227230944:
4: 33028.. 53007: 227271164.. 227291143: 19980: 227169608:
5: 53008.. 53011: 227230948.. 227230951: 4: 227291144:
6: 53012.. 72991: 227291148.. 227311127: 19980: 227230952:
7: 72992.. 72995: 227230952.. 227230955: 4: 227311128:
8: 72996.. 86291: 227311132.. 227324427: 13296: 227230956: last,eof
linux-4.5-rc6.tar.xz: 9 extents found
Now I'm like ¯\(ツ)/¯
With autodefrag the same happens, though it then eventually does the
merging from 4k -> 256k. I went searching for that hardcoded 256k value
and found it as default in ioctl.c:btrfs_defrag_file() when no threshold
has been passed, as is the case for autodefrag. I'll try to increase that
and see how much I can destroy.
Also, rsync with --bwlimit=1m does _not_ seem to create files like this:
$rsync (..)
$filefrag -ek linux-4.4.4.tar.bz2
Filesystem type is: 9123683e
File size of linux-4.4.4.tar.bz2 is 105008928 (102548 blocks of 1024 bytes)
ext: logical_offset: physical_offset: length: expected: flags:
0: 0.. 4095: 227197920.. 227202015: 4096:
1: 4096.. 25599: 227202016.. 227223519: 21504:
2: 25600.. 51199: 227271164.. 227296763: 25600: 227223520:
3: 51200.. 76799: 227296764.. 227322363: 25600:
4: 76800.. 102547: 227322364.. 227348111: 25748: last,eof
linux-4.4.4.tar.bz2: 2 extents found
Which looks exactly as one would expect, probably - as Chris' mail
just explained - it doesn't use O_APPEND, whereas wget apparently does.
> I'd be somewhat curious to see if something similar happens on other
> filesystems with such low writeback timeouts. My thought in this
> case is that the issue is that BTRFS's allocator isn't smart enough
> to try and merge new extents into existing ones when possible.
ext4 creates 1-2 extents, regardless of method.
Holger
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-03 21:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-03 12:28 Stray 4k extents with slow buffered writes Holger Hoffstätte
2016-03-03 18:33 ` Liu Bo
2016-03-03 19:53 ` Holger Hoffstätte
2016-03-03 20:47 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2016-03-03 21:50 ` Holger Hoffstätte [this message]
2016-03-03 22:13 ` Liu Bo
2016-03-04 1:37 ` Liu Bo
2016-03-04 12:17 ` Duncan
2016-03-03 20:55 ` Chris Mason
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56D8B1C2.1040604@googlemail.com \
--to=holger.hoffstaette@googlemail.com \
--cc=ahferroin7@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).