From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>,
Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>, David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Subject: btrfs_get_token_64() alignment problem on ARM (was: Re: DWord alignment on ARMv7)
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2016 09:01:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56D940E8.2030202@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160303235426.GA11237@arm.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1968 bytes --]
Hello,
On 03/04/2016 12:54 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi Marc,
>
> On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 11:27:11PM +0100, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
>> I'm using btrfs on am ARMv7 and it turns out, that the kernel has to
>> fixup a lot of kernel originated alignment issues.
>>
>> See /proc/cpu/alignment (~4h of uptime):
>>> System: 22304815 (btrfs_get_token_64+0x13c/0x148 [btrfs])
>>
>> For example, when compiling the kernel on a btrfs volume the counter
>> increases by 100...1000 per second.
>>
>> The function shown "btrfs_get_token_64()" is defined here:
>>> http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/fs/btrfs/struct-funcs.c#L53
>> ...it already uses get_unaligned_leXX accessors.
>>
>> Quoting a comment in arch/arm/mm/alignment.c:
>>
>> * ARMv6 and later CPUs can perform unaligned accesses for
>> * most single load and store instructions up to word size.
>> * LDM, STM, LDRD and STRD still need to be handled.
>>
>> But on a 32bit ARMv7 64bits are not word-sized.
>>
>> Is the exception and fixup overhead neglectable? Do we have to introduce
>> something like HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_64BIT_ACCESS?
>
> Ouch, that trap/emulate is certainly going to have an effect on your
> performance. I doubt that HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS applies to
> types bigger than the native word size on many architectures, so my
> hunch is that the btrfs code should be checking BITS_PER_LONG or similar
> to establish whether or not to break the access up into word accesses.
I've added the btrfs maintainers on Cc.
> A cursory look at the network layer indicates that kind of trick is done
> over there.
I stumbled over this, too.
Marc
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde |
Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 |
Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de |
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 455 bytes --]
next parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-04 8:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <56D8BA3F.7050508@pengutronix.de>
[not found] ` <20160303235426.GA11237@arm.com>
2016-03-04 8:01 ` Marc Kleine-Budde [this message]
2016-03-04 9:16 ` btrfs_get_token_64() alignment problem on ARM (was: Re: DWord alignment on ARMv7) David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56D940E8.2030202@pengutronix.de \
--to=mkl@pengutronix.de \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=jbacik@fb.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).