linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Austin S. Hemmelgarn" <ahferroin7@gmail.com>
To: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs-progs: add stat check in open_ctree_fs_info
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 07:25:00 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56EA940C.9080707@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pan$5827c$2850555c$6b75a991$da57cc2e@cox.net>

On 2016-03-17 04:58, Duncan wrote:
> Austin S. Hemmelgarn posted on Wed, 16 Mar 2016 11:26:11 -0400 as
> excerpted:
>
>> Currently, open_ctree_fs_info will open whatever path you pass it and
>> try to interpret it as a BTRFS filesystem.  While this is not
>> nessecarily dangerous (except possibly if done on a character device),
>> it does result in some rather cryptic and non-sensical error messages
>> when trying to run certain commands in ways they weren't intended to be
>> run.  Add a check using stat(2) to verify that the path we've been
>> passed is in fact a regular file or a block device.
>>
>> This causes the following commands to provide a helpful error message
>> when run on a FIFO, directory, character device, or socket:
>
> Umm... what about a symlink?  A symlink isn't a block device or regular
> file, but obviously with udev, symlinks to block devices /better/ work.
> Do you dereference symlinks before doing this check?
>
>
I'm using stat(2) instead of lstat(2), and stat(2) dereferences symlinks 
just like open(2) does, so I shouldn't have to dereference them 
manually.  That said, I did check that it works with symlinks to both 
block devices and regular files, and everything appears to work correctly.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-03-17 11:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-16 15:26 [PATCH] btrfs-progs: add stat check in open_ctree_fs_info Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2016-03-17  8:58 ` Duncan
2016-03-17 11:25   ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn [this message]
2016-03-17  9:04 ` Qu Wenruo
2016-03-17 11:22   ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2016-03-18  0:38     ` Qu Wenruo
2016-03-18 11:17       ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2016-03-18 15:03         ` David Sterba
2016-03-21  0:14         ` Qu Wenruo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56EA940C.9080707@gmail.com \
    --to=ahferroin7@gmail.com \
    --cc=1i5t5.duncan@cox.net \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).