From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lf0-f44.google.com ([209.85.215.44]:36364 "EHLO mail-lf0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750785AbcFDHYs (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Jun 2016 03:24:48 -0400 Received: by mail-lf0-f44.google.com with SMTP id b73so66953024lfb.3 for ; Sat, 04 Jun 2016 00:24:47 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: btrfs To: Christoph Anton Mitterer , Austin S Hemmelgarn , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org References: <1464819934.6742.71.camel@scientia.net> <1464975482.6679.11.camel@scientia.net> <6f18c0d1-8ac5-c325-0ba8-ffb949c54554@gmail.com> <1465005092.6648.39.camel@scientia.net> From: Andrei Borzenkov Message-ID: <57528238.6080809@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2016 10:24:40 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1465005092.6648.39.camel@scientia.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: 04.06.2016 04:51, Christoph Anton Mitterer пишет: ... > >> The only extant systems that support higher >> levels of replication and call it RAID-1 are entirely based on MD >> RAID >> and it's poor choice of naming. > > Not true either, show me any single hardware RAID controller that does > RAID1 in a dup2 fashion... I manage some >2PiB of storage at the > faculty, all controller we have, handle RAID1 in the sense of "all > disks mirrored". > Out of curiosity - which model of hardware controllers? Those I am aware of simply won't let you create RAID1 if more than 2 disks are selected.