From: Graham Cobb <g.btrfs@cobb.uk.net>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Extents for a particular subvolume
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 22:55:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57A26867.5020403@cobb.uk.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160803203708.GA26505@angband.pl>
On 03/08/16 21:37, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 08:56:01PM +0100, Graham Cobb wrote:
>> Are there any btrfs commands (or APIs) to allow a script to create a
>> list of all the extents referred to within a particular (mounted)
>> subvolume? And is it a reasonably efficient process (i.e. doesn't
>> involve backrefs and, preferably, doesn't involve following directory
>> trees)?
>
> Since the size of your output is linear to the number of extents which is
> between the number of files and sum of their sizes, I see no gain in
> trying to avoid following the directory tree.
Thanks for the help, Adam. There are a lot of files and a lot of
directories - find, "ls -R" and similar operations take a very long
time. I was hoping that I could query some sort of extent tree for the
subvolume and get the answer back in seconds instead of multiple minutes.
But I can follow the directory tree if I need to.
>> I am not looking to relate the extents to files/inodes/paths. My
>> particular need, at the moment, is to work out how much of two snapshots
>> is shared data, but I can think of other uses for the information.
>
> Thus, unlike the question you asked above, you're not interested in _all_
> extents, merely those which changed.
>
> You may want to look at "btrfs subv find-new" and "btrfs send --no-data".
Unfortunately, the subvolumes do not have an ancestor-descendent
relationship (although they do have some common ancestors), so I don't
think find-new is much help (as far as I can see).
But just looking at the size of the output from "send -c" would work
well enough for the particular problem I am trying to solve tonight!
Although I will need to take read-only snapshots of the subvolumes to
allow send to work. Thanks for the suggestion.
I would still be interested in the extent list, though. The main
problem with find-new and send is that they don't tell me how much has
been deleted, only added. I am thinking about using the extents to get
a much better handle on what is using up space and what I could recover
if I removed (or moved to another volume) various groups of related
subvolumes.
Thanks again for the help.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-03 21:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-03 19:56 Extents for a particular subvolume Graham Cobb
2016-08-03 20:37 ` Adam Borowski
2016-08-03 21:55 ` Graham Cobb [this message]
2016-08-04 11:34 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2016-08-15 19:18 ` Graham Cobb
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57A26867.5020403@cobb.uk.net \
--to=g.btrfs@cobb.uk.net \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).