linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* 4.8rc8 & OOM panic
@ 2016-09-28 18:46 E V
  2016-09-28 19:45 ` Holger Hoffstätte
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: E V @ 2016-09-28 18:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-btrfs

I just booted my backup box with 4.8rc8 and started an rsync onto
btrfs and it panic'd with OOM a couple hours later. I thought the OOM
problems from 4.7 we're supposed to be fixed in 4.8, or did I get that
wrong? No users or anything else on the system.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: 4.8rc8 & OOM panic
  2016-09-28 18:46 4.8rc8 & OOM panic E V
@ 2016-09-28 19:45 ` Holger Hoffstätte
  2016-10-03 18:37   ` Holger Hoffstätte
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Holger Hoffstätte @ 2016-09-28 19:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: E V, linux-btrfs

On 09/28/16 20:46, E V wrote:
> I just booted my backup box with 4.8rc8 and started an rsync onto
> btrfs and it panic'd with OOM a couple hours later. I thought the OOM
> problems from 4.7 we're supposed to be fixed in 4.8, or did I get that
> wrong? No users or anything else on the system.

Keep in mind that those problems are generic, other filesystems also
suffer: http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mm/msg114123.html

I don't see any recent compaction-related patches in Linus' tree at
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/log/mm/

..so it seems they have not been merged yet.

So unless they get merged in the last minute it looks like 4.8 will
be DOA.

-h


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: 4.8rc8 & OOM panic
  2016-09-28 19:45 ` Holger Hoffstätte
@ 2016-10-03 18:37   ` Holger Hoffstätte
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Holger Hoffstätte @ 2016-10-03 18:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: E V, linux-btrfs

On 09/28/16 21:45, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
> On 09/28/16 20:46, E V wrote:
>> I just booted my backup box with 4.8rc8 and started an rsync onto
>> btrfs and it panic'd with OOM a couple hours later. I thought the OOM
>> problems from 4.7 we're supposed to be fixed in 4.8, or did I get that
>> wrong? No users or anything else on the system.
> 
> Keep in mind that those problems are generic, other filesystems also
> suffer: http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mm/msg114123.html
> 
> I don't see any recent compaction-related patches in Linus' tree at
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/log/mm/

Sorry, that was not quite correct. -stable 4.7.x and 4.8 contain
a workaround (http://goo.gl/DiwfPH) that is supposed to help.
That went into 4.8rc8 already, so not sure what happened in your case.

> So unless they get merged in the last minute it looks like 4.8 will
> be DOA.

Running 4.8 final now, let's see what happens..

-h


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2016-10-03 18:37 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-09-28 18:46 4.8rc8 & OOM panic E V
2016-09-28 19:45 ` Holger Hoffstätte
2016-10-03 18:37   ` Holger Hoffstätte

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).