From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
To: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@kernel.org>, Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] btrfs: prevent metadata flush from being interrupted for del_balance_item()
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 16:06:37 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <58134f59-671c-46ee-93b3-053d12a9d73f@gmx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZN3RRO83qL6UDay2@debian0.Home>
On 2023/8/17 15:50, Filipe Manana wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 02:06:24PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>> [BUG]
>>
>> There is an internal bug report that there are only 3 lines of btrfs
>> errors, then btrfs falls read-only:
>>
>> [358958.022131] BTRFS info (device dm-9): balance: canceled
>> [358958.022148] BTRFS: error (device dm-9) in __cancel_balance:4014: errno=-4 unknown
>> [358958.022150] BTRFS info (device dm-9): forced readonly
>>
>> [CAUSE]
>> The error number -4 is -EINTR, and according to the code line (although
>> backported kernel, the code is still relevant upstream), it's the
>> btrfs_handle_fs_error() call inside reset_balance_state().
>>
>> This can happen when we try to start a transaction which requires
>> metadata flushing.
>>
>> This metadata flushing can be interrupted by signal, thus it can return
>> -EINTR.
>>
>> For our case, the -EINTR is deadly because we are unable to handle the
>> interrupted metadata flushing at this timing, and would immediately mark
>> the fs read-only in the following call chain:
>>
>> reset_balance_state()
>> |- del_balance_item()
>> | `- btrfs_start_transation_fallback_global_rsv()
>> | `- start_transaction()
>> | `- btrfs_block_rsv_add()
>> | `- __reserve_bytes()
>> | `- handle_reserve_ticket()
>> | `- wait_reserve_ticket()
>> | `- prepare_to_wait_event()
>> | This wait has TASK_KILLABLE, thus can be
>> | interrupted.
>> | Thus we return -EINTR.
>> |
>> |- IS_ERR(trans) triggered
>> |- btrfs_handle_fs_error()
>> The fs is marked read-only.
>>
>> [FIX]
>> For this particular call site, we can not afford just erroring out with
>> -EINTR.
>>
>> Thus here we introduce a new flush type,
>> BTRFS_RESERVE_FLUSH_ALL_STEAL_UNINTERRUPTIBLE, for this call site.
>>
>> This new flush type would wait for the ticket using TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE
>> instead, thus it won't be interrupted by signal.
>>
>> Since we're here, also enhance the error message a little to make it
>> more readable.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
>> ---
>> Changelog:
>> v2:
>> - Instead retrying, introduce a new flush type
>> The retrying can lead to dead loop as inside kernel space the signal
>> won't be cleared until we reach user space.
>> Thus we may retry forever.
>>
>> Instead going TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE for this particular callsite would
>> be a safer bet.
>> ---
>> fs/btrfs/space-info.c | 11 +++++++++--
>> fs/btrfs/space-info.h | 5 +++++
>> fs/btrfs/transaction.c | 9 +++++++++
>> fs/btrfs/transaction.h | 3 +++
>> fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 8 ++++++--
>> 5 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/space-info.c b/fs/btrfs/space-info.c
>> index d7e8cd4f140c..6fce57c6f2a1 100644
>> --- a/fs/btrfs/space-info.c
>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/space-info.c
>> @@ -1454,15 +1454,21 @@ static void priority_reclaim_data_space(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
>>
>> static void wait_reserve_ticket(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
>> struct btrfs_space_info *space_info,
>> + enum btrfs_reserve_flush_enum flush,
>> struct reserve_ticket *ticket)
>>
>> {
>> + int state;
>> DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
>> int ret = 0;
>>
>> + if (flush == BTRFS_RESERVE_FLUSH_ALL_STEAL_UNINTERRUPTIBLE)
>> + state = TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE;
>> + else
>> + state = TASK_KILLABLE;
>> spin_lock(&space_info->lock);
>> while (ticket->bytes > 0 && ticket->error == 0) {
>> - ret = prepare_to_wait_event(&ticket->wait, &wait, TASK_KILLABLE);
>> + ret = prepare_to_wait_event(&ticket->wait, &wait, state);
>> if (ret) {
>> /*
>> * Delete us from the list. After we unlock the space
>> @@ -1511,7 +1517,8 @@ static int handle_reserve_ticket(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
>> case BTRFS_RESERVE_FLUSH_DATA:
>> case BTRFS_RESERVE_FLUSH_ALL:
>> case BTRFS_RESERVE_FLUSH_ALL_STEAL:
>> - wait_reserve_ticket(fs_info, space_info, ticket);
>> + case BTRFS_RESERVE_FLUSH_ALL_STEAL_UNINTERRUPTIBLE:
>> + wait_reserve_ticket(fs_info, space_info, flush, ticket);
>> break;
>> case BTRFS_RESERVE_FLUSH_LIMIT:
>> priority_reclaim_metadata_space(fs_info, space_info, ticket,
>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/space-info.h b/fs/btrfs/space-info.h
>> index 0bb9d14e60a8..e9d8243da0fc 100644
>> --- a/fs/btrfs/space-info.h
>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/space-info.h
>> @@ -50,6 +50,11 @@ enum btrfs_reserve_flush_enum {
>> */
>> BTRFS_RESERVE_FLUSH_ALL_STEAL,
>>
>> + /*
>> + * The same as BTRFS_RESERVE_FLUSH_ALL_STEAL, but won't be interrupred.
>> + */
>> + BTRFS_RESERVE_FLUSH_ALL_STEAL_UNINTERRUPTIBLE,
>> +
>> /*
>> * This is for btrfs_use_block_rsv only. We have exhausted our block
>> * rsv and our global block rsv. This can happen for things like
>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/transaction.c b/fs/btrfs/transaction.c
>> index ab09542f2170..6a09e80b6875 100644
>> --- a/fs/btrfs/transaction.c
>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/transaction.c
>> @@ -785,6 +785,15 @@ struct btrfs_trans_handle *btrfs_start_transaction_fallback_global_rsv(
>> BTRFS_RESERVE_FLUSH_ALL_STEAL, false);
>> }
>>
>> +struct btrfs_trans_handle *btrfs_start_transaction_fallback_uninterruptible(
>> + struct btrfs_root *root,
>> + unsigned int num_items)
>> +{
>> + return start_transaction(root, num_items, TRANS_START,
>> + BTRFS_RESERVE_FLUSH_ALL_STEAL_UNINTERRUPTIBLE,
>> + false);
>> +}
>> +
>> struct btrfs_trans_handle *btrfs_join_transaction(struct btrfs_root *root)
>> {
>> return start_transaction(root, 0, TRANS_JOIN, BTRFS_RESERVE_NO_FLUSH,
>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/transaction.h b/fs/btrfs/transaction.h
>> index 8e9fa23bd7fe..06f245e6c546 100644
>> --- a/fs/btrfs/transaction.h
>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/transaction.h
>> @@ -233,6 +233,9 @@ struct btrfs_trans_handle *btrfs_start_transaction(struct btrfs_root *root,
>> struct btrfs_trans_handle *btrfs_start_transaction_fallback_global_rsv(
>> struct btrfs_root *root,
>> unsigned int num_items);
>> +struct btrfs_trans_handle *btrfs_start_transaction_fallback_uninterruptible(
>> + struct btrfs_root *root,
>> + unsigned int num_items);
>> struct btrfs_trans_handle *btrfs_join_transaction(struct btrfs_root *root);
>> struct btrfs_trans_handle *btrfs_join_transaction_spacecache(struct btrfs_root *root);
>> struct btrfs_trans_handle *btrfs_join_transaction_nostart(struct btrfs_root *root);
>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
>> index 189da583bb67..389e14fc2c3e 100644
>> --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
>> @@ -3507,7 +3507,11 @@ static int del_balance_item(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
>> if (!path)
>> return -ENOMEM;
>>
>> - trans = btrfs_start_transaction_fallback_global_rsv(root, 0);
>> + /*
>> + * Here we don't want this transaction start to be interrupted, or we
>> + * will mark the fs read-only.
>> + */
>> + trans = btrfs_start_transaction_fallback_uninterruptible(root, 0);
>
> Ouch, adding a new flush method, a new transaction start API, etc, just for this.
>
> So I replied to you on the thread for v1, but before I could reply you went this
> way anyway:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CAL3q7H5g1E8ZWqtAA6Ltb+_aWAqOm6iR57ojnGCyskZZrFDMuQ@mail.gmail.com/
>
> I'm not convinded the -EINTR comes from btrfs_start_transaction_fallback_global_rsv(),
> it should not since it's not doing any space reservation. Correct me if I missed something.
You're right, please discard this patch.
The problem I described is only possible for older kernels, not for the
upstream kernel after commit 3502a8c0dc1b ("btrfs: allow use of global
block reserve for balance item deletion").
I only need to backport that patch.
Thanks,
Qu
>
> Thanks.
>
>> if (IS_ERR(trans)) {
>> btrfs_free_path(path);
>> return PTR_ERR(trans);
>> @@ -3594,7 +3598,7 @@ static void reset_balance_state(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
>> kfree(bctl);
>> ret = del_balance_item(fs_info);
>> if (ret)
>> - btrfs_handle_fs_error(fs_info, ret, NULL);
>> + btrfs_handle_fs_error(fs_info, ret, "failed to delete balance item");
>> }
>>
>> /*
>> --
>> 2.41.0
>>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-17 8:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-17 6:06 [PATCH v2] btrfs: prevent metadata flush from being interrupted for del_balance_item() Qu Wenruo
2023-08-17 7:50 ` Filipe Manana
2023-08-17 8:06 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=58134f59-671c-46ee-93b3-053d12a9d73f@gmx.com \
--to=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
--cc=fdmanana@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wqu@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox