From: Marc Joliet <marcec@gmx.de>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: system hangs due to qgroups
Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2016 20:20:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5831203.ygVuIMpfzH@thetick> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pan$69035$81ae24e2$d7110ac$22963947@cox.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1794 bytes --]
On Sunday 04 December 2016 18:24:08 Duncan wrote:
> Marc Joliet posted on Sun, 04 Dec 2016 17:02:48 +0100 as excerpted:
> > That's a good idea, although I'll probably start with sysrescuecd (Linux
> > 4.8.5 and btrfs-progs 4.7.3), as I already have experience with it.
> >
> > [After trying it]
> >
> > Well, crap, I was able to get images of the file system (one sanitized),
> > but mounting always fails with "device or resource busy" (with no
> > corresponding dmesg output). (Also, that drive's partitions weren't
> > discovered on bootup, I had to run partprobe first.) I never see that
> > in the initramfs, so I'm not sure what's causing that.
>
> If I understand correctly what you're doing, that part is easily enough
> explained.
>
> Remember that btrfs, unlike most filesystems, is multi-device capable.
> The way it tracks which devices belong to which filesystems is by UUID,
> universally *UNIQUE* ID. If you image a device via dd or similar, you of
> course image its UUID as well, destroying the "unique" assumption in UUID
> and confusing btrfs, which will consider it part of the existing
> filesystem if the original devices with that filesystem UUID remain
> hooked up.
>
> So if you did what I believe you did, try to mount the image while the
> original filesystem devices remain attached and mounted, btrfs is simply
> saying that filesystem (which btrfs identifies by UUID) is already
> mounted: "device or resource busy".
[...]
Nope, sorry if I wasn't clear, I didn't mean that I tried to mount the image
(can you even mount images created with btrfs-image?). Plus the images are
xz-compressed.
--
Marc Joliet
--
"People who think they know everything really annoy those of us who know we
don't" - Bjarne Stroustrup
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-04 19:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-03 18:40 system hangs due to qgroups Marc Joliet
2016-12-03 20:42 ` Chris Murphy
2016-12-03 21:46 ` Marc Joliet
2016-12-03 22:56 ` Chris Murphy
2016-12-04 16:02 ` Marc Joliet
2016-12-04 18:24 ` Duncan
2016-12-04 19:20 ` Marc Joliet [this message]
2016-12-05 2:32 ` Duncan
2016-12-04 18:52 ` Chris Murphy
2016-12-05 9:00 ` Marc Joliet
2016-12-05 10:16 ` Marc Joliet
2016-12-05 23:22 ` Marc Joliet
2016-12-19 11:17 ` Marc Joliet
2016-12-04 2:10 ` Adam Borowski
2016-12-04 16:02 ` Marc Joliet
2016-12-05 0:39 ` Qu Wenruo
2016-12-05 11:01 ` Marc Joliet
2016-12-05 12:10 ` Marc Joliet
2016-12-05 14:43 ` [SOLVED] " Marc Joliet
2016-12-06 0:29 ` Qu Wenruo
2016-12-06 10:12 ` Marc Joliet
2016-12-06 14:55 ` Marc Joliet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5831203.ygVuIMpfzH@thetick \
--to=marcec@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).