linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
To: dsterba@suse.cz, Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl>,
	Roman Mamedov <rm@romanrm.net>,
	Timofey Titovets <nefelim4ag@gmail.com>,
	linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Btrfs: add skeleton code for compression heuristic
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 23:04:11 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <597B445B.9070107@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170727153653.GO2866@twin.jikos.cz>



On 28/07/2017 00:36, David Sterba wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 11:40:17PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
>>
>>> Eg. files that are already compressed would increase the cpu consumption
>>> with compress-force, while they'd be hopefully detected as
>>> incompressible with 'compress' and clever heuristics. So the NOCOMPRESS
>>> bit would better reflect the status of the file.

  I thought 'compress' in above, is the compress option. Ah you mean
  to say compression algo .. got it. Right compress-force for
  incompressible-data is very expensive.

  And its also true that compress option for incompressible data is
  not at all expensive and its only one time.

>>    current NOCOMPRESS is based on trial and error method and is more
>>    accurate than heuristic also loss of cpu power is only one time ?


> Curreently, force-compress beats everything, so even a file with
> NOCOMPRESS will be compressed, all new writes will be passed to the
> compression and stored uncompressed eventually.

  It makes sense to me when you replace NOCOMPRESS with
  incompressible-data in the above statement. As in my understanding..

  You will never have a file with NOCOMPRESS flag if compress-force
  option is used.


> Each time they
> compression code will run and fail, so it's not one time.
>
> Although you can say it's more 'accurate', it's also more expensive.

   yes. Expensive only in compress-force.

>>    May be the only opportunity that heuristic can facilitate is at the
>>    logic to monitor and reset the NOCOMPRESS, as of now there is no
>>    such a logic.
>
> The heurictic can be made adaptive, and examine data even for NOCOMPRESS
> files, but that's a few steps ahead of where we are now.

   Nice.

Thanks, Anand


      reply	other threads:[~2017-07-28 14:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-17 13:52 [PATCH v3] Btrfs: add skeleton code for compression heuristic Timofey Titovets
2017-07-17 18:30 ` David Sterba
2017-07-21  5:00   ` Anand Jain
2017-07-21 18:37     ` Roman Mamedov
2017-07-21 21:00       ` Adam Borowski
2017-07-22  0:52         ` Anand Jain
2017-07-24 14:53         ` David Sterba
2017-07-24 15:40           ` Anand Jain
2017-07-27 15:36             ` David Sterba
2017-07-28 14:04               ` Anand Jain [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=597B445B.9070107@oracle.com \
    --to=anand.jain@oracle.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
    --cc=kilobyte@angband.pl \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nefelim4ag@gmail.com \
    --cc=rm@romanrm.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).