From: "Austin S. Hemmelgarn" <ahferroin7@gmail.com>
To: Martin Steigerwald <martin.steigerwald@teamix.de>,
Roman Mamedov <rm@romanrm.net>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, Martin <martin@lichtvoll.de>
Subject: Re: degraded BTRFS RAID 1 not mountable: open_ctree failed, unable to find block group for 0
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 07:57:08 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5a0c51bd-4245-92e2-566b-cc3dbcc26a84@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1672818.LEbdb7TNyD@merkaba>
On 2016-11-16 06:04, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 16. November 2016, 16:00:31 CET schrieb Roman Mamedov:
>> On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 11:55:32 +0100
>>
>> Martin Steigerwald <martin.steigerwald@teamix.de> wrote:
>>> I do think that above kernel messages invite such a kind of interpretation
>>> tough. I took the "BTRFS: open_ctree failed" message as indicative to some
>>> structural issue with the filesystem.
>>
>> For the reason as to why the writable mount didn't work, check "btrfs fi df"
>> for the filesystem to see if you have any "single" profile chunks on it:
>> quite likely you did already mount it "degraded,rw" in the past *once*,
>> after which those "single" chunks get created, and consequently it won't
>> mount r/w anymore (without lifting the restriction on the number of missing
>> devices as proposed).
>
> That exactly explains it. I very likely did a degraded mount without ro on
> this disk already.
>
> Funnily enough this creates another complication:
>
> merkaba:/mnt/zeit#1> btrfs send somesubvolume | btrfs receive /mnt/
> someotherbtrfs
> ERROR: subvolume /mnt/zeit/somesubvolume is not read-only
>
> Yet:
>
> merkaba:/mnt/zeit> btrfs property get somesubvolume
> ro=false
> merkaba:/mnt/zeit> btrfs property set somesubvolume ro true
> ERROR: failed to set flags for somesubvolume: Read-only file system
>
> To me it seems right logic would be to allow the send to proceed in case
> the whole filesystem is readonly.
It should, but doesn't currently. There was a thread about this a while
back, but I don't think it ever resulted in anything changing.
>
> As there seems to be no force option to override the limitation and I
> do not feel like compiling my own btrfs-tools right now, I will use rsync
> instead.
In a case like this, I'd trust rsync more than send/receive. The
following rsync switches might also be of interest:
-a: This turns on a bunch of things almost everyone wants when using
rsync, similar to the same switch for cp, just with even more added in.
-H: This recreates hardlinks on the receiving end.
-S: This recreates sparse files.
-A: This copies POSIX ACL's
-X: This copies extended attributes (most of them at least, there are a
few that can't be arbitrarily written to).
Pre-creating the subvolumes by hand combined with using all of those
will get you almost everything covered by send/receive except for
sharing of extents and ctime.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-16 12:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-16 10:25 degraded BTRFS RAID 1 not mountable: open_ctree failed, unable to find block group for 0 Martin Steigerwald
2016-11-16 10:43 ` Roman Mamedov
2016-11-16 10:55 ` Martin Steigerwald
2016-11-16 11:00 ` Roman Mamedov
2016-11-16 11:04 ` Martin Steigerwald
2016-11-16 12:57 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn [this message]
2016-11-16 17:06 ` Martin Steigerwald
2016-11-17 20:05 ` Chris Murphy
2016-11-17 20:20 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2016-11-19 20:27 ` Chris Murphy
2016-11-20 11:58 ` Niccolò Belli
2016-11-17 20:46 ` Martin Steigerwald
2016-11-16 11:18 ` Martin Steigerwald
2016-11-16 12:48 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-08-22 9:31 g6094199
2017-08-22 10:28 ` Dmitrii Tcvetkov
2017-08-23 13:12 g6094199
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5a0c51bd-4245-92e2-566b-cc3dbcc26a84@gmail.com \
--to=ahferroin7@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.steigerwald@teamix.de \
--cc=martin@lichtvoll.de \
--cc=rm@romanrm.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).