From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
To: hmsjwzb <hmsjwzb@zoho.com>, anand.jain@oracle.com, nborisov@suse.com
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, dsterba@suse.com,
josef@toxicpanda.com, clm@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs-progs: Fix seed device bug for btrfs249
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2022 14:21:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5d90f06e-0ee0-4744-0c84-c8cddf2edef2@gmx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <548b9707-1fbd-c906-b195-3b8ffe93863e@zoho.com>
On 2022/8/11 14:07, hmsjwzb wrote:
> Hi Qu,
>
> Thanks for you reply. I am working on the tree-search based solution.
> I have got the btrfs_dev_item from the chunk tree.
> But I don't know how to tell whether it is a seed device.
You can check the fsid.
Seed device has a different fsid than the one returned by BTRFS_IOC_FS_INFO.
Thanks,
Qu
> Do you have some solution to tell whether it is a seed device or not?
>
> Thanks,
> Flint
>
> On 8/10/22 03:56, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>> Commit message please.
>>
>> On 2022/8/10 15:33, Flint.Wang wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Flint.Wang <hmsjwzb@zoho.com>
>>> ---
>>> cmds/device.c | 2 +-
>>> cmds/filesystem-usage.c | 10 +++++-----
>>> cmds/filesystem-usage.h | 2 +-
>>> common/utils.c | 9 +++++----
>>> common/utils.h | 2 +-
>>> ioctl.h | 2 ++
>>> 6 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/cmds/device.c b/cmds/device.c
>>> index 7d3febff..81559110 100644
>>> --- a/cmds/device.c
>>> +++ b/cmds/device.c
>>> @@ -752,7 +752,7 @@ static int _cmd_device_usage(int fd, const char *path, unsigned unit_mode)
>>> int devcount = 0;
>>>
>>> ret = load_chunk_and_device_info(fd, &chunkinfo, &chunkcount, &devinfo,
>>> - &devcount);
>>> + &devcount, false);
>>> if (ret)
>>> goto out;
>>>
>>> diff --git a/cmds/filesystem-usage.c b/cmds/filesystem-usage.c
>>> index 01729e18..b2ed3212 100644
>>> --- a/cmds/filesystem-usage.c
>>> +++ b/cmds/filesystem-usage.c
>>> @@ -693,7 +693,7 @@ out:
>>> * This function loads the device_info structure and put them in an array
>>> */
>>> static int load_device_info(int fd, struct device_info **device_info_ptr,
>>> - int *device_info_count)
>>> + int *device_info_count, bool noseed)
>>> {
>>> int ret, i, ndevs;
>>> struct btrfs_ioctl_fs_info_args fi_args;
>>> @@ -727,7 +727,7 @@ static int load_device_info(int fd, struct device_info **device_info_ptr,
>>> goto out;
>>> }
>>> memset(&dev_info, 0, sizeof(dev_info));
>>> - ret = get_device_info(fd, i, &dev_info);
>>> + ret = get_device_info(fd, i, &dev_info, noseed);
>>>
>>> if (ret == -ENODEV)
>>> continue;
>>> @@ -779,7 +779,7 @@ out:
>>> }
>>>
>>> int load_chunk_and_device_info(int fd, struct chunk_info **chunkinfo,
>>> - int *chunkcount, struct device_info **devinfo, int *devcount)
>>> + int *chunkcount, struct device_info **devinfo, int *devcount, bool noseed)
>>> {
>>> int ret;
>>>
>>> @@ -791,7 +791,7 @@ int load_chunk_and_device_info(int fd, struct chunk_info **chunkinfo,
>>> return ret;
>>> }
>>>
>>> - ret = load_device_info(fd, devinfo, devcount);
>>> + ret = load_device_info(fd, devinfo, devcount, noseed);
>>> if (ret == -EPERM) {
>>> warning(
>>> "cannot get filesystem info from ioctl(FS_INFO), run as root");
>>> @@ -1172,7 +1172,7 @@ static int cmd_filesystem_usage(const struct cmd_struct *cmd,
>>> printf("\n");
>>>
>>> ret = load_chunk_and_device_info(fd, &chunkinfo, &chunkcount,
>>> - &devinfo, &devcount);
>>> + &devinfo, &devcount, true);
>>> if (ret)
>>> goto cleanup;
>>>
>>> diff --git a/cmds/filesystem-usage.h b/cmds/filesystem-usage.h
>>> index cab38462..6fd04172 100644
>>> --- a/cmds/filesystem-usage.h
>>> +++ b/cmds/filesystem-usage.h
>>> @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ struct chunk_info {
>>> };
>>>
>>> int load_chunk_and_device_info(int fd, struct chunk_info **chunkinfo,
>>> - int *chunkcount, struct device_info **devinfo, int *devcount);
>>> + int *chunkcount, struct device_info **devinfo, int *devcount, bool noseed);
>>> void print_device_chunks(struct device_info *devinfo,
>>> struct chunk_info *chunks_info_ptr,
>>> int chunks_info_count, unsigned unit_mode);
>>> diff --git a/common/utils.c b/common/utils.c
>>> index 1ed5571f..72d50885 100644
>>> --- a/common/utils.c
>>> +++ b/common/utils.c
>>> @@ -285,14 +285,15 @@ void btrfs_format_csum(u16 csum_type, const u8 *data, char *output)
>>> }
>>>
>>> int get_device_info(int fd, u64 devid,
>>> - struct btrfs_ioctl_dev_info_args *di_args)
>>> + struct btrfs_ioctl_dev_info_args *di_args, bool noseed)
>>> {
>>> int ret;
>>> + unsigned long req = noseed ? BTRFS_IOC_DEV_INFO_NOSEED : BTRFS_IOC_DEV_INFO;
>>>
>>> di_args->devid = devid;
>>> memset(&di_args->uuid, '\0', sizeof(di_args->uuid));
>>>
>>> - ret = ioctl(fd, BTRFS_IOC_DEV_INFO, di_args);
>>> + ret = ioctl(fd, req, di_args);
>>> return ret < 0 ? -errno : 0;
>>> }
>>>
>>> @@ -498,7 +499,7 @@ int get_fs_info(const char *path, struct btrfs_ioctl_fs_info_args *fi_args,
>>> * search_chunk_tree_for_fs_info() will lacks the devid 0
>>> * so manual probe for it here.
>>> */
>>> - ret = get_device_info(fd, 0, &tmp);
>>> + ret = get_device_info(fd, 0, &tmp, false);
>>
>> No, I don't think we should go that complex.
>>
>> The root cause is pretty simple, btrfs_ioctl_fs_info() just return RW
>> devices for its fi_args->num_devices.
>>
>> This is fine for most cases, but for seed devices cases, we can not rely
>> on that.
>>
>>
>> Knowing that, it's much easier to fix in user space, do a tree-search
>> ioctl to grab the device items from chunk tree, then we can easily check
>> the total number of devices (including RW and seed devices).
>>
>> With that info, we even have the FSID of each devices, then we can call
>> btrfs_ioctl_dev_info() to get each device.
>>
>>
>> I'd like to have a better optimization, to skip above chunk tree search,
>> but I don't have a quick idea on how to determine if a fs has seed devices.
>>
>>
>> Another more elegant solution is to make btrfs_ioctl_fs_info_args to
>> include one new member, total_devs, so that we can get rid of all the
>> problems.
>>
>> But for compatibility reasons, above tree-search based solution is still
>> needed as a fallback.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Qu
>>
>>> if (!ret) {
>>> fi_args->num_devices++;
>>> ndevs++;
>>> @@ -521,7 +522,7 @@ int get_fs_info(const char *path, struct btrfs_ioctl_fs_info_args *fi_args,
>>> memcpy(di_args, &tmp, sizeof(tmp));
>>> for (; last_devid <= fi_args->max_id && ndevs < fi_args->num_devices;
>>> last_devid++) {
>>> - ret = get_device_info(fd, last_devid, &di_args[ndevs]);
>>> + ret = get_device_info(fd, last_devid, &di_args[ndevs], false);
>>> if (ret == -ENODEV)
>>> continue;
>>> if (ret)
>>> diff --git a/common/utils.h b/common/utils.h
>>> index ea05fe5b..de4f93ca 100644
>>> --- a/common/utils.h
>>> +++ b/common/utils.h
>>> @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ int lookup_path_rootid(int fd, u64 *rootid);
>>> int find_mount_fsroot(const char *subvol, const char *subvolid, char **mount);
>>> int find_mount_root(const char *path, char **mount_root);
>>> int get_device_info(int fd, u64 devid,
>>> - struct btrfs_ioctl_dev_info_args *di_args);
>>> + struct btrfs_ioctl_dev_info_args *di_args, bool noseed);
>>> int get_df(int fd, struct btrfs_ioctl_space_args **sargs_ret);
>>>
>>> const char *subvol_strip_mountpoint(const char *mnt, const char *full_path);
>>> diff --git a/ioctl.h b/ioctl.h
>>> index 368a87b2..e68fe58d 100644
>>> --- a/ioctl.h
>>> +++ b/ioctl.h
>>> @@ -883,6 +883,8 @@ static inline char *btrfs_err_str(enum btrfs_err_code err_code)
>>> struct btrfs_ioctl_scrub_args)
>>> #define BTRFS_IOC_DEV_INFO _IOWR(BTRFS_IOCTL_MAGIC, 30, \
>>> struct btrfs_ioctl_dev_info_args)
>>> +#define BTRFS_IOC_DEV_INFO_NOSEED _IOR(BTRFS_IOCTL_MAGIC, 30, \
>>> + struct btrfs_ioctl_dev_info_args)
>>> #define BTRFS_IOC_FS_INFO _IOR(BTRFS_IOCTL_MAGIC, 31, \
>>> struct btrfs_ioctl_fs_info_args)
>>> #define BTRFS_IOC_BALANCE_V2 _IOWR(BTRFS_IOCTL_MAGIC, 32, \
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-11 6:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-10 7:33 [PATCH] btrfs-progs: Fix seed device bug for btrfs249 Flint.Wang
2022-08-10 7:56 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-08-11 6:07 ` hmsjwzb
2022-08-11 6:21 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5d90f06e-0ee0-4744-0c84-c8cddf2edef2@gmx.com \
--to=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
--cc=anand.jain@oracle.com \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=hmsjwzb@zoho.com \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nborisov@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox