From: Oliver Freyermuth <o.freyermuth@googlemail.com>
To: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: btrfs send extremely slow (almost stuck)
Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2016 23:41:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5e6e606d-e75c-b7f1-0a9f-4e36090659eb@googlemail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a7ead62b-38f5-2ed6-c24b-1960a8fc6ba8@cn.fujitsu.com>
Am 30.08.2016 um 02:48 schrieb Qu Wenruo:
> Yes.
> And more specifically, it doesn't even affect delta backup.
>
> For shared extents caused by reflink/dedupe(out-of-band or even incoming in-band), it will be send as individual files.
>
> For contents, they are all the same, just more space usage.
For those interested, I have now actually tested the btrfs send / btrfs receive backup for several subvolumes after applying this patch.
The throughput is finally usable, almost hitting network / IO limits as expected - ideal so far!
Also delta seemed fine for the subvolumes for which things worked.
However, I now sadly get (for one of my subvolumes):
send ioctl failed with -2: No such file or directory
at some point during the transfer, it sadly seems to be reproducible.
I do not think it's related to this patch, but of course this makes "btrfs send" still unusable to me -
I guess it's not ready for general use just yet.
Is there any information I can easily extract / provide to allow the experts to fix this issue?
The kernel log shows nothing.
Thanks a lot,
Oliver
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-04 21:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-28 3:38 btrfs send extremely slow (almost stuck) Oliver Freyermuth
2016-08-28 7:53 ` Duncan
2016-08-29 2:11 ` Qu Wenruo
2016-08-29 2:12 ` Qu Wenruo
2016-08-31 1:35 ` Jeff Mahoney
2016-08-31 1:54 ` Qu Wenruo
2016-08-29 10:02 ` Oliver Freyermuth
2016-08-30 0:48 ` Qu Wenruo
2016-09-04 21:41 ` Oliver Freyermuth [this message]
2016-09-05 5:21 ` Qu Wenruo
2016-09-05 21:29 ` Oliver Freyermuth
2016-09-06 2:13 ` Duncan
2016-09-06 22:24 ` Oliver Freyermuth
2016-09-06 2:46 ` Qu Wenruo
2016-09-06 21:53 ` Oliver Freyermuth
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-08-28 16:15 Oliver Freyermuth
2016-08-28 21:41 ` james harvey
2016-08-29 17:50 ` Kai Krakow
2017-04-14 15:33 J. Hart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5e6e606d-e75c-b7f1-0a9f-4e36090659eb@googlemail.com \
--to=o.freyermuth@googlemail.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).