* [PATCH v5 1/2] btrfs: make fs_devices to be a local variable
2018-07-16 9:34 [PATCH v5 0/2] btrfs: do some parameters optimization Gu Jinxiang
@ 2018-07-16 9:11 ` Gu Jinxiang
2018-07-16 12:31 ` Nikolay Borisov
2018-07-16 9:11 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] btrfs: get device pointer from btrfs_scan_one_device Gu Jinxiang
1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Gu Jinxiang @ 2018-07-16 9:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-btrfs; +Cc: anand.jain
fs_devices is always passed to btrfs_scan_one_device which
overrides it. And in the call stack below fs_devices is passed to
btrfs_scan_one_device from btrfs_mount_root.
And in btrfs_mount_root the output fs_devices of this call stack
is not used.
btrfs_mount_root
-> btrfs_parse_early_options
->btrfs_scan_one_device
So, there is no necessary to pass fs_devices from btrfs_mount_root,
use a local variable in btrfs_parse_early_options is enough.
Signed-off-by: Gu Jinxiang <gujx@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <Anand.Jain@oracle.com>
---
Changelog:
v5: change a line wrap, and rebase to misc-next.
v4: changed a line warp, and adjusted the order of two rows.
v3: rebase to misc-next.
v2: deal with Nikolay's comment, make changelog more clair.
fs/btrfs/super.c | 9 +++++----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/super.c b/fs/btrfs/super.c
index 28ab75ebb983..dcab4a0244e5 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/super.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/super.c
@@ -884,10 +884,11 @@ int btrfs_parse_options(struct btrfs_fs_info *info, char *options,
* only when we need to allocate a new super block.
*/
static int btrfs_parse_early_options(const char *options, fmode_t flags,
- void *holder, struct btrfs_fs_devices **fs_devices)
+ void *holder)
{
substring_t args[MAX_OPT_ARGS];
char *device_name, *opts, *orig, *p;
+ struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices = NULL;
int error = 0;
lockdep_assert_held(&uuid_mutex);
@@ -917,8 +918,8 @@ static int btrfs_parse_early_options(const char *options, fmode_t flags,
error = -ENOMEM;
goto out;
}
- error = btrfs_scan_one_device(device_name,
- flags, holder, fs_devices);
+ error = btrfs_scan_one_device(device_name, flags,
+ holder, &fs_devices);
kfree(device_name);
if (error)
goto out;
@@ -1554,7 +1555,7 @@ static struct dentry *btrfs_mount_root(struct file_system_type *fs_type,
}
mutex_lock(&uuid_mutex);
- error = btrfs_parse_early_options(data, mode, fs_type, &fs_devices);
+ error = btrfs_parse_early_options(data, mode, fs_type);
if (error) {
mutex_unlock(&uuid_mutex);
goto error_fs_info;
--
2.17.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v5 2/2] btrfs: get device pointer from btrfs_scan_one_device
2018-07-16 9:34 [PATCH v5 0/2] btrfs: do some parameters optimization Gu Jinxiang
2018-07-16 9:11 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] btrfs: make fs_devices to be a local variable Gu Jinxiang
@ 2018-07-16 9:11 ` Gu Jinxiang
2018-07-16 12:34 ` David Sterba
1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Gu Jinxiang @ 2018-07-16 9:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-btrfs; +Cc: anand.jain
Instead of pointer to btrfs_fs_devices as an arg in
btrfs_scan_one_device, better to make it as a return value.
And since btrfs_fs_devices can be get by btrfs_device,
better to return btrfs_device than fs_btrfs_devices.
Signed-off-by: Gu Jinxiang <gujx@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
Changelog:
v5: rebase to misc-next.
v4: as suggested by Anand, change return value of
btrfs_scan_one_device from btrfs_fs_devices to btrfs_device.
v3: as comment by robot, use PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO, and rebase to misc-next.
v2: as comment by Nikolay, use ERR_CAST instead of cast type manually.
fs/btrfs/super.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 22 ++++++++--------------
fs/btrfs/volumes.h | 4 ++--
3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/super.c b/fs/btrfs/super.c
index dcab4a0244e5..413bbe2d6db2 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/super.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/super.c
@@ -888,7 +888,7 @@ static int btrfs_parse_early_options(const char *options, fmode_t flags,
{
substring_t args[MAX_OPT_ARGS];
char *device_name, *opts, *orig, *p;
- struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices = NULL;
+ struct btrfs_device *device = NULL;
int error = 0;
lockdep_assert_held(&uuid_mutex);
@@ -918,11 +918,13 @@ static int btrfs_parse_early_options(const char *options, fmode_t flags,
error = -ENOMEM;
goto out;
}
- error = btrfs_scan_one_device(device_name, flags,
- holder, &fs_devices);
+ device = btrfs_scan_one_device(device_name, flags,
+ holder);
kfree(device_name);
- if (error)
+ if (IS_ERR(device)) {
+ error = PTR_ERR(device);
goto out;
+ }
}
}
@@ -1518,6 +1520,7 @@ static struct dentry *btrfs_mount_root(struct file_system_type *fs_type,
{
struct block_device *bdev = NULL;
struct super_block *s;
+ struct btrfs_device *device = NULL;
struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices = NULL;
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = NULL;
struct security_mnt_opts new_sec_opts;
@@ -1561,12 +1564,15 @@ static struct dentry *btrfs_mount_root(struct file_system_type *fs_type,
goto error_fs_info;
}
- error = btrfs_scan_one_device(device_name, mode, fs_type, &fs_devices);
- if (error) {
+ device = btrfs_scan_one_device(device_name, mode, fs_type);
+ if (IS_ERR(device)) {
+ error = PTR_ERR(device);
mutex_unlock(&uuid_mutex);
goto error_fs_info;
}
+ fs_devices = device->fs_devices;
+
fs_info->fs_devices = fs_devices;
error = btrfs_open_devices(fs_devices, mode, fs_type);
@@ -2227,7 +2233,7 @@ static long btrfs_control_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
unsigned long arg)
{
struct btrfs_ioctl_vol_args *vol;
- struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices;
+ struct btrfs_device *device = NULL;
int ret = -ENOTTY;
if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
@@ -2240,19 +2246,22 @@ static long btrfs_control_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
switch (cmd) {
case BTRFS_IOC_SCAN_DEV:
mutex_lock(&uuid_mutex);
- ret = btrfs_scan_one_device(vol->name, FMODE_READ,
- &btrfs_root_fs_type, &fs_devices);
+ device = btrfs_scan_one_device(vol->name, FMODE_READ,
+ &btrfs_root_fs_type);
+ ret = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(device);
mutex_unlock(&uuid_mutex);
break;
case BTRFS_IOC_DEVICES_READY:
mutex_lock(&uuid_mutex);
- ret = btrfs_scan_one_device(vol->name, FMODE_READ,
- &btrfs_root_fs_type, &fs_devices);
- if (ret) {
+ device = btrfs_scan_one_device(vol->name, FMODE_READ,
+ &btrfs_root_fs_type);
+ if (IS_ERR(device)) {
+ ret = PTR_ERR(device);
mutex_unlock(&uuid_mutex);
break;
}
- ret = !(fs_devices->num_devices == fs_devices->total_devices);
+ ret = !(device->fs_devices->num_devices ==
+ device->fs_devices->total_devices);
mutex_unlock(&uuid_mutex);
break;
case BTRFS_IOC_GET_SUPPORTED_FEATURES:
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
index 88d37bfa99c8..9f485696461b 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -1213,15 +1213,14 @@ static int btrfs_read_disk_super(struct block_device *bdev, u64 bytenr,
* and we are not allowed to call set_blocksize during the scan. The superblock
* is read via pagecache
*/
-int btrfs_scan_one_device(const char *path, fmode_t flags, void *holder,
- struct btrfs_fs_devices **fs_devices_ret)
+struct btrfs_device *btrfs_scan_one_device(const char *path, fmode_t flags,
+ void *holder)
{
struct btrfs_super_block *disk_super;
bool new_device_added = false;
- struct btrfs_device *device;
+ struct btrfs_device *ret = NULL;
struct block_device *bdev;
struct page *page;
- int ret = 0;
u64 bytenr;
lockdep_assert_held(&uuid_mutex);
@@ -1237,21 +1236,16 @@ int btrfs_scan_one_device(const char *path, fmode_t flags, void *holder,
bdev = blkdev_get_by_path(path, flags, holder);
if (IS_ERR(bdev))
- return PTR_ERR(bdev);
+ return ERR_CAST(bdev);
if (btrfs_read_disk_super(bdev, bytenr, &page, &disk_super)) {
- ret = -EINVAL;
+ ret = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
goto error_bdev_put;
}
- device = device_list_add(path, disk_super, &new_device_added);
- if (IS_ERR(device)) {
- ret = PTR_ERR(device);
- } else {
- *fs_devices_ret = device->fs_devices;
- if (new_device_added)
- btrfs_free_stale_devices(path, device);
- }
+ ret = device_list_add(path, disk_super, &new_device_added);
+ if (new_device_added)
+ btrfs_free_stale_devices(path, ret);
btrfs_release_disk_super(page);
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.h b/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
index 9665b84b1026..06d8bb7dd557 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
@@ -403,8 +403,8 @@ blk_status_t btrfs_map_bio(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, struct bio *bio,
int mirror_num, int async_submit);
int btrfs_open_devices(struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices,
fmode_t flags, void *holder);
-int btrfs_scan_one_device(const char *path, fmode_t flags, void *holder,
- struct btrfs_fs_devices **fs_devices_ret);
+struct btrfs_device *btrfs_scan_one_device(const char *path,
+ fmode_t flags, void *holder);
int btrfs_close_devices(struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices);
void btrfs_free_extra_devids(struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices, int step);
void btrfs_assign_next_active_device(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
--
2.17.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v5 0/2] btrfs: do some parameters optimization
@ 2018-07-16 9:34 Gu Jinxiang
2018-07-16 9:11 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] btrfs: make fs_devices to be a local variable Gu Jinxiang
2018-07-16 9:11 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] btrfs: get device pointer from btrfs_scan_one_device Gu Jinxiang
0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Gu Jinxiang @ 2018-07-16 9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-btrfs; +Cc: anand.jain
Do parameters optimization for function btrfs_parse_early_options
and btrfs_scan_one_device.
Gu Jinxiang (2):
btrfs: make fs_devices to be a local variable
btrfs: get device pointer from btrfs_scan_one_device
fs/btrfs/super.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 22 ++++++++--------------
fs/btrfs/volumes.h | 4 ++--
3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
--
2.17.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] btrfs: make fs_devices to be a local variable
2018-07-16 9:11 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] btrfs: make fs_devices to be a local variable Gu Jinxiang
@ 2018-07-16 12:31 ` Nikolay Borisov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Nikolay Borisov @ 2018-07-16 12:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gu Jinxiang, linux-btrfs; +Cc: anand.jain
On 16.07.2018 12:11, Gu Jinxiang wrote:
> fs_devices is always passed to btrfs_scan_one_device which
> overrides it. And in the call stack below fs_devices is passed to
> btrfs_scan_one_device from btrfs_mount_root.
> And in btrfs_mount_root the output fs_devices of this call stack
> is not used.
> btrfs_mount_root
> -> btrfs_parse_early_options
> ->btrfs_scan_one_device
> So, there is no necessary to pass fs_devices from btrfs_mount_root,
> use a local variable in btrfs_parse_early_options is enough.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gu Jinxiang <gujx@cn.fujitsu.com>
> Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <Anand.Jain@oracle.com>
> ---
>
> Changelog:
> v5: change a line wrap, and rebase to misc-next.
> v4: changed a line warp, and adjusted the order of two rows.
> v3: rebase to misc-next.
> v2: deal with Nikolay's comment, make changelog more clair.
>
> fs/btrfs/super.c | 9 +++++----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/super.c b/fs/btrfs/super.c
> index 28ab75ebb983..dcab4a0244e5 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/super.c
> @@ -884,10 +884,11 @@ int btrfs_parse_options(struct btrfs_fs_info *info, char *options,
> * only when we need to allocate a new super block.
> */
> static int btrfs_parse_early_options(const char *options, fmode_t flags,
> - void *holder, struct btrfs_fs_devices **fs_devices)
> + void *holder)
> {
> substring_t args[MAX_OPT_ARGS];
> char *device_name, *opts, *orig, *p;
> + struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices = NULL;
> int error = 0;
>
> lockdep_assert_held(&uuid_mutex);
> @@ -917,8 +918,8 @@ static int btrfs_parse_early_options(const char *options, fmode_t flags,
> error = -ENOMEM;
> goto out;
> }
> - error = btrfs_scan_one_device(device_name,
> - flags, holder, fs_devices);
> + error = btrfs_scan_one_device(device_name, flags,
> + holder, &fs_devices);
You are line wraps are in fact worse than before, the first letter of
the "holder.." line has to be aligned exactly under the first letter of
"device_name". I assume David will fix this while merging so no need to
resend but fix your editor for future submissions.
> kfree(device_name);
> if (error)
> goto out;
> @@ -1554,7 +1555,7 @@ static struct dentry *btrfs_mount_root(struct file_system_type *fs_type,
> }
>
> mutex_lock(&uuid_mutex);
> - error = btrfs_parse_early_options(data, mode, fs_type, &fs_devices);
> + error = btrfs_parse_early_options(data, mode, fs_type);
> if (error) {
> mutex_unlock(&uuid_mutex);
> goto error_fs_info;
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] btrfs: get device pointer from btrfs_scan_one_device
2018-07-16 9:11 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] btrfs: get device pointer from btrfs_scan_one_device Gu Jinxiang
@ 2018-07-16 12:34 ` David Sterba
2018-07-17 1:08 ` Gu, Jinxiang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: David Sterba @ 2018-07-16 12:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gu Jinxiang; +Cc: linux-btrfs, anand.jain
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 05:11:17PM +0800, Gu Jinxiang wrote:
> Instead of pointer to btrfs_fs_devices as an arg in
> btrfs_scan_one_device, better to make it as a return value.
>
> And since btrfs_fs_devices can be get by btrfs_device,
> better to return btrfs_device than fs_btrfs_devices.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gu Jinxiang <gujx@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
>
> Changelog:
> v5: rebase to misc-next.
> v4: as suggested by Anand, change return value of
> btrfs_scan_one_device from btrfs_fs_devices to btrfs_device.
> v3: as comment by robot, use PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO, and rebase to misc-next.
> v2: as comment by Nikolay, use ERR_CAST instead of cast type manually.
>
> fs/btrfs/super.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 22 ++++++++--------------
> fs/btrfs/volumes.h | 4 ++--
> 3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/super.c b/fs/btrfs/super.c
> index dcab4a0244e5..413bbe2d6db2 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/super.c
> @@ -888,7 +888,7 @@ static int btrfs_parse_early_options(const char *options, fmode_t flags,
> {
> substring_t args[MAX_OPT_ARGS];
> char *device_name, *opts, *orig, *p;
> - struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices = NULL;
> + struct btrfs_device *device = NULL;
> int error = 0;
>
> lockdep_assert_held(&uuid_mutex);
> @@ -918,11 +918,13 @@ static int btrfs_parse_early_options(const char *options, fmode_t flags,
> error = -ENOMEM;
> goto out;
> }
> - error = btrfs_scan_one_device(device_name, flags,
> - holder, &fs_devices);
> + device = btrfs_scan_one_device(device_name, flags,
> + holder);
> kfree(device_name);
> - if (error)
> + if (IS_ERR(device)) {
> + error = PTR_ERR(device);
> goto out;
> + }
> }
> }
>
> @@ -1518,6 +1520,7 @@ static struct dentry *btrfs_mount_root(struct file_system_type *fs_type,
> {
> struct block_device *bdev = NULL;
> struct super_block *s;
> + struct btrfs_device *device = NULL;
> struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices = NULL;
> struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = NULL;
> struct security_mnt_opts new_sec_opts;
> @@ -1561,12 +1564,15 @@ static struct dentry *btrfs_mount_root(struct file_system_type *fs_type,
> goto error_fs_info;
> }
>
> - error = btrfs_scan_one_device(device_name, mode, fs_type, &fs_devices);
> - if (error) {
> + device = btrfs_scan_one_device(device_name, mode, fs_type);
> + if (IS_ERR(device)) {
> + error = PTR_ERR(device);
> mutex_unlock(&uuid_mutex);
> goto error_fs_info;
> }
>
> + fs_devices = device->fs_devices;
> +
> fs_info->fs_devices = fs_devices;
>
> error = btrfs_open_devices(fs_devices, mode, fs_type);
> @@ -2227,7 +2233,7 @@ static long btrfs_control_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
> unsigned long arg)
> {
> struct btrfs_ioctl_vol_args *vol;
> - struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices;
> + struct btrfs_device *device = NULL;
> int ret = -ENOTTY;
>
> if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
> @@ -2240,19 +2246,22 @@ static long btrfs_control_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
> switch (cmd) {
> case BTRFS_IOC_SCAN_DEV:
> mutex_lock(&uuid_mutex);
> - ret = btrfs_scan_one_device(vol->name, FMODE_READ,
> - &btrfs_root_fs_type, &fs_devices);
> + device = btrfs_scan_one_device(vol->name, FMODE_READ,
> + &btrfs_root_fs_type);
> + ret = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(device);
> mutex_unlock(&uuid_mutex);
> break;
> case BTRFS_IOC_DEVICES_READY:
> mutex_lock(&uuid_mutex);
> - ret = btrfs_scan_one_device(vol->name, FMODE_READ,
> - &btrfs_root_fs_type, &fs_devices);
> - if (ret) {
> + device = btrfs_scan_one_device(vol->name, FMODE_READ,
> + &btrfs_root_fs_type);
> + if (IS_ERR(device)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(device);
> mutex_unlock(&uuid_mutex);
> break;
> }
> - ret = !(fs_devices->num_devices == fs_devices->total_devices);
> + ret = !(device->fs_devices->num_devices ==
> + device->fs_devices->total_devices);
> mutex_unlock(&uuid_mutex);
> break;
> case BTRFS_IOC_GET_SUPPORTED_FEATURES:
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> index 88d37bfa99c8..9f485696461b 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> @@ -1213,15 +1213,14 @@ static int btrfs_read_disk_super(struct block_device *bdev, u64 bytenr,
> * and we are not allowed to call set_blocksize during the scan. The superblock
> * is read via pagecache
> */
> -int btrfs_scan_one_device(const char *path, fmode_t flags, void *holder,
> - struct btrfs_fs_devices **fs_devices_ret)
> +struct btrfs_device *btrfs_scan_one_device(const char *path, fmode_t flags,
> + void *holder)
> {
> struct btrfs_super_block *disk_super;
> bool new_device_added = false;
> - struct btrfs_device *device;
> + struct btrfs_device *ret = NULL;
> struct block_device *bdev;
> struct page *page;
> - int ret = 0;
> u64 bytenr;
>
> lockdep_assert_held(&uuid_mutex);
> @@ -1237,21 +1236,16 @@ int btrfs_scan_one_device(const char *path, fmode_t flags, void *holder,
>
> bdev = blkdev_get_by_path(path, flags, holder);
> if (IS_ERR(bdev))
> - return PTR_ERR(bdev);
> + return ERR_CAST(bdev);
>
> if (btrfs_read_disk_super(bdev, bytenr, &page, &disk_super)) {
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> + ret = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> goto error_bdev_put;
> }
>
> - device = device_list_add(path, disk_super, &new_device_added);
> - if (IS_ERR(device)) {
> - ret = PTR_ERR(device);
> - } else {
> - *fs_devices_ret = device->fs_devices;
> - if (new_device_added)
> - btrfs_free_stale_devices(path, device);
> - }
> + ret = device_list_add(path, disk_super, &new_device_added);
> + if (new_device_added)
> + btrfs_free_stale_devices(path, ret);
Why is this skipping the error handling? I've resolved the conflict in a
different way in misc-next, have you had a look there?
Also the 'ret' got dropped and 'device' is used instead, the non-int
type for ret would be confusing.
>
> btrfs_release_disk_super(page);
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.h b/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
> index 9665b84b1026..06d8bb7dd557 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
> @@ -403,8 +403,8 @@ blk_status_t btrfs_map_bio(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, struct bio *bio,
> int mirror_num, int async_submit);
> int btrfs_open_devices(struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices,
> fmode_t flags, void *holder);
> -int btrfs_scan_one_device(const char *path, fmode_t flags, void *holder,
> - struct btrfs_fs_devices **fs_devices_ret);
> +struct btrfs_device *btrfs_scan_one_device(const char *path,
> + fmode_t flags, void *holder);
> int btrfs_close_devices(struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices);
> void btrfs_free_extra_devids(struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices, int step);
> void btrfs_assign_next_active_device(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
> --
> 2.17.1
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH v5 2/2] btrfs: get device pointer from btrfs_scan_one_device
2018-07-16 12:34 ` David Sterba
@ 2018-07-17 1:08 ` Gu, Jinxiang
2018-07-17 4:54 ` Anand Jain
2018-07-17 13:48 ` David Sterba
0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Gu, Jinxiang @ 2018-07-17 1:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dsterba@suse.cz; +Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, anand.jain@oracle.com
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312", Size: 8038 bytes --]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Sterba [mailto:dsterba@suse.cz]
> Sent: Monday, July 16, 2018 8:34 PM
> To: Gu, Jinxiang/¹Ë ½ðÏã <gujx@cn.fujitsu.com>
> Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org; anand.jain@oracle.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] btrfs: get device pointer from btrfs_scan_one_device
>
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 05:11:17PM +0800, Gu Jinxiang wrote:
> > Instead of pointer to btrfs_fs_devices as an arg in
> > btrfs_scan_one_device, better to make it as a return value.
> >
> > And since btrfs_fs_devices can be get by btrfs_device,
> > better to return btrfs_device than fs_btrfs_devices.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Gu Jinxiang <gujx@cn.fujitsu.com>
> > ---
> >
> > Changelog:
> > v5: rebase to misc-next.
> > v4: as suggested by Anand, change return value of
> > btrfs_scan_one_device from btrfs_fs_devices to btrfs_device.
> > v3: as comment by robot, use PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO, and rebase to misc-next.
> > v2: as comment by Nikolay, use ERR_CAST instead of cast type manually.
> >
> > fs/btrfs/super.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> > fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 22 ++++++++--------------
> > fs/btrfs/volumes.h | 4 ++--
> > 3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/super.c b/fs/btrfs/super.c
> > index dcab4a0244e5..413bbe2d6db2 100644
> > --- a/fs/btrfs/super.c
> > +++ b/fs/btrfs/super.c
> > @@ -888,7 +888,7 @@ static int btrfs_parse_early_options(const char *options, fmode_t flags,
> > {
> > substring_t args[MAX_OPT_ARGS];
> > char *device_name, *opts, *orig, *p;
> > - struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices = NULL;
> > + struct btrfs_device *device = NULL;
> > int error = 0;
> >
> > lockdep_assert_held(&uuid_mutex);
> > @@ -918,11 +918,13 @@ static int btrfs_parse_early_options(const char *options, fmode_t flags,
> > error = -ENOMEM;
> > goto out;
> > }
> > - error = btrfs_scan_one_device(device_name, flags,
> > - holder, &fs_devices);
> > + device = btrfs_scan_one_device(device_name, flags,
> > + holder);
> > kfree(device_name);
> > - if (error)
> > + if (IS_ERR(device)) {
> > + error = PTR_ERR(device);
> > goto out;
> > + }
> > }
> > }
> >
> > @@ -1518,6 +1520,7 @@ static struct dentry *btrfs_mount_root(struct file_system_type *fs_type,
> > {
> > struct block_device *bdev = NULL;
> > struct super_block *s;
> > + struct btrfs_device *device = NULL;
> > struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices = NULL;
> > struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = NULL;
> > struct security_mnt_opts new_sec_opts;
> > @@ -1561,12 +1564,15 @@ static struct dentry *btrfs_mount_root(struct file_system_type *fs_type,
> > goto error_fs_info;
> > }
> >
> > - error = btrfs_scan_one_device(device_name, mode, fs_type, &fs_devices);
> > - if (error) {
> > + device = btrfs_scan_one_device(device_name, mode, fs_type);
> > + if (IS_ERR(device)) {
> > + error = PTR_ERR(device);
> > mutex_unlock(&uuid_mutex);
> > goto error_fs_info;
> > }
> >
> > + fs_devices = device->fs_devices;
> > +
> > fs_info->fs_devices = fs_devices;
> >
> > error = btrfs_open_devices(fs_devices, mode, fs_type);
> > @@ -2227,7 +2233,7 @@ static long btrfs_control_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
> > unsigned long arg)
> > {
> > struct btrfs_ioctl_vol_args *vol;
> > - struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices;
> > + struct btrfs_device *device = NULL;
> > int ret = -ENOTTY;
> >
> > if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
> > @@ -2240,19 +2246,22 @@ static long btrfs_control_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
> > switch (cmd) {
> > case BTRFS_IOC_SCAN_DEV:
> > mutex_lock(&uuid_mutex);
> > - ret = btrfs_scan_one_device(vol->name, FMODE_READ,
> > - &btrfs_root_fs_type, &fs_devices);
> > + device = btrfs_scan_one_device(vol->name, FMODE_READ,
> > + &btrfs_root_fs_type);
> > + ret = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(device);
> > mutex_unlock(&uuid_mutex);
> > break;
> > case BTRFS_IOC_DEVICES_READY:
> > mutex_lock(&uuid_mutex);
> > - ret = btrfs_scan_one_device(vol->name, FMODE_READ,
> > - &btrfs_root_fs_type, &fs_devices);
> > - if (ret) {
> > + device = btrfs_scan_one_device(vol->name, FMODE_READ,
> > + &btrfs_root_fs_type);
> > + if (IS_ERR(device)) {
> > + ret = PTR_ERR(device);
> > mutex_unlock(&uuid_mutex);
> > break;
> > }
> > - ret = !(fs_devices->num_devices == fs_devices->total_devices);
> > + ret = !(device->fs_devices->num_devices ==
> > + device->fs_devices->total_devices);
> > mutex_unlock(&uuid_mutex);
> > break;
> > case BTRFS_IOC_GET_SUPPORTED_FEATURES:
> > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> > index 88d37bfa99c8..9f485696461b 100644
> > --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> > +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> > @@ -1213,15 +1213,14 @@ static int btrfs_read_disk_super(struct block_device *bdev, u64 bytenr,
> > * and we are not allowed to call set_blocksize during the scan. The superblock
> > * is read via pagecache
> > */
> > -int btrfs_scan_one_device(const char *path, fmode_t flags, void *holder,
> > - struct btrfs_fs_devices **fs_devices_ret)
> > +struct btrfs_device *btrfs_scan_one_device(const char *path, fmode_t flags,
> > + void *holder)
> > {
> > struct btrfs_super_block *disk_super;
> > bool new_device_added = false;
> > - struct btrfs_device *device;
> > + struct btrfs_device *ret = NULL;
> > struct block_device *bdev;
> > struct page *page;
> > - int ret = 0;
> > u64 bytenr;
> >
> > lockdep_assert_held(&uuid_mutex);
> > @@ -1237,21 +1236,16 @@ int btrfs_scan_one_device(const char *path, fmode_t flags, void *holder,
> >
> > bdev = blkdev_get_by_path(path, flags, holder);
> > if (IS_ERR(bdev))
> > - return PTR_ERR(bdev);
> > + return ERR_CAST(bdev);
> >
> > if (btrfs_read_disk_super(bdev, bytenr, &page, &disk_super)) {
> > - ret = -EINVAL;
> > + ret = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> > goto error_bdev_put;
> > }
> >
> > - device = device_list_add(path, disk_super, &new_device_added);
> > - if (IS_ERR(device)) {
> > - ret = PTR_ERR(device);
> > - } else {
> > - *fs_devices_ret = device->fs_devices;
> > - if (new_device_added)
> > - btrfs_free_stale_devices(path, device);
> > - }
> > + ret = device_list_add(path, disk_super, &new_device_added);
> > + if (new_device_added)
> > + btrfs_free_stale_devices(path, ret);
>
> Why is this skipping the error handling? I've resolved the conflict in a
> different way in misc-next, have you had a look there?
Since when new_device_added set to be true, the return value of device_list_add
must not a error value.
So, I think no necessary to add the judge.
>
> Also the 'ret' got dropped and 'device' is used instead, the non-int
> type for ret would be confusing.
OK, Thank you.
>
> >
> > btrfs_release_disk_super(page);
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.h b/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
> > index 9665b84b1026..06d8bb7dd557 100644
> > --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
> > +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
> > @@ -403,8 +403,8 @@ blk_status_t btrfs_map_bio(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, struct bio *bio,
> > int mirror_num, int async_submit);
> > int btrfs_open_devices(struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices,
> > fmode_t flags, void *holder);
> > -int btrfs_scan_one_device(const char *path, fmode_t flags, void *holder,
> > - struct btrfs_fs_devices **fs_devices_ret);
> > +struct btrfs_device *btrfs_scan_one_device(const char *path,
> > + fmode_t flags, void *holder);
> > int btrfs_close_devices(struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices);
> > void btrfs_free_extra_devids(struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices, int step);
> > void btrfs_assign_next_active_device(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
ÿôèº{.nÇ+·®+%Ëÿ±éݶ\x17¥wÿº{.nÇ+·¥{±ý»k~ÏâØ^nr¡ö¦zË\x1aëh¨èÚ&£ûàz¿äz¹Þú+Ê+zf£¢·h§~Ûiÿÿïêÿêçz_è®\x0fæj:+v¨þ)ߣøm
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] btrfs: get device pointer from btrfs_scan_one_device
2018-07-17 1:08 ` Gu, Jinxiang
@ 2018-07-17 4:54 ` Anand Jain
2018-07-17 13:50 ` David Sterba
2018-07-17 13:48 ` David Sterba
1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Anand Jain @ 2018-07-17 4:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dsterba@suse.cz; +Cc: Gu, Jinxiang, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
::
>>> @@ -1561,12 +1564,15 @@ static struct dentry *btrfs_mount_root(struct file_system_type *fs_type,
>>> goto error_fs_info;
>>> }
>>>
>>> - error = btrfs_scan_one_device(device_name, mode, fs_type, &fs_devices);
>>> - if (error) {
>>> + device = btrfs_scan_one_device(device_name, mode, fs_type);
>>> + if (IS_ERR(device)) {
>>> + error = PTR_ERR(device);
>>> mutex_unlock(&uuid_mutex);
>>> goto error_fs_info;
>>> }
>>>
>>> + fs_devices = device->fs_devices;
>>> +
The version at misc-next is missing this assignment and it panics.
::
Thanks, Anand
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] btrfs: get device pointer from btrfs_scan_one_device
2018-07-17 1:08 ` Gu, Jinxiang
2018-07-17 4:54 ` Anand Jain
@ 2018-07-17 13:48 ` David Sterba
1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: David Sterba @ 2018-07-17 13:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gu, Jinxiang
Cc: dsterba@suse.cz, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
anand.jain@oracle.com
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 01:08:34AM +0000, Gu, Jinxiang wrote:
> > > - device = device_list_add(path, disk_super, &new_device_added);
> > > - if (IS_ERR(device)) {
> > > - ret = PTR_ERR(device);
> > > - } else {
> > > - *fs_devices_ret = device->fs_devices;
> > > - if (new_device_added)
> > > - btrfs_free_stale_devices(path, device);
> > > - }
> > > + ret = device_list_add(path, disk_super, &new_device_added);
> > > + if (new_device_added)
> > > + btrfs_free_stale_devices(path, ret);
> >
> > Why is this skipping the error handling? I've resolved the conflict in a
> > different way in misc-next, have you had a look there?
>
> Since when new_device_added set to be true, the return value of device_list_add
> must not a error value.
Yeah, but this is not obvious from the context and looks like "
device_list_add fails but we'll do something anyway", so I'm for keeping
the check.
> So, I think no necessary to add the judge.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] btrfs: get device pointer from btrfs_scan_one_device
2018-07-17 4:54 ` Anand Jain
@ 2018-07-17 13:50 ` David Sterba
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: David Sterba @ 2018-07-17 13:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Anand Jain; +Cc: dsterba@suse.cz, Gu, Jinxiang, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 12:54:00PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
>
> ::
>
> >>> @@ -1561,12 +1564,15 @@ static struct dentry *btrfs_mount_root(struct file_system_type *fs_type,
> >>> goto error_fs_info;
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> - error = btrfs_scan_one_device(device_name, mode, fs_type, &fs_devices);
> >>> - if (error) {
> >>> + device = btrfs_scan_one_device(device_name, mode, fs_type);
> >>> + if (IS_ERR(device)) {
> >>> + error = PTR_ERR(device);
> >>> mutex_unlock(&uuid_mutex);
> >>> goto error_fs_info;
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> + fs_devices = device->fs_devices;
> >>> +
>
> The version at misc-next is missing this assignment and it panics.
Thanks, that was my mismerge. Now added back and pushed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-07-17 14:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-07-16 9:34 [PATCH v5 0/2] btrfs: do some parameters optimization Gu Jinxiang
2018-07-16 9:11 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] btrfs: make fs_devices to be a local variable Gu Jinxiang
2018-07-16 12:31 ` Nikolay Borisov
2018-07-16 9:11 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] btrfs: get device pointer from btrfs_scan_one_device Gu Jinxiang
2018-07-16 12:34 ` David Sterba
2018-07-17 1:08 ` Gu, Jinxiang
2018-07-17 4:54 ` Anand Jain
2018-07-17 13:50 ` David Sterba
2018-07-17 13:48 ` David Sterba
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).