From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf0-f193.google.com ([209.85.192.193]:39258 "EHLO mail-pf0-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756566AbeEJGVc (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 May 2018 02:21:32 -0400 Received: by mail-pf0-f193.google.com with SMTP id a22-v6so563899pfn.6 for ; Wed, 09 May 2018 23:21:32 -0700 (PDT) From: Omar Sandoval To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Cc: kernel-team@fb.com, Chris Mason , Josef Bacik Subject: [PATCH 06/10] Btrfs: don't return ino if inode item removal fails Date: Wed, 9 May 2018 23:21:07 -0700 Message-Id: <62232de691b62b5eaf6f6b4912848e1e7bf65ebd.1525932796.git.osandov@fb.com> In-Reply-To: References: In-Reply-To: References: Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Omar Sandoval In btrfs_evict_inode(), if btrfs_truncate_inode_items() fails, the inode item will still be in the tree but we still return the ino to the ino cache. That will blow up later when someone tries to allocate that ino, so don't return it to the cache. Fixes: 581bb050941b ("Btrfs: Cache free inode numbers in memory") Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval --- fs/btrfs/inode.c | 25 +++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c index e77df96de642..9a6a4e626e01 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c @@ -5368,13 +5368,18 @@ void btrfs_evict_inode(struct inode *inode) trans->block_rsv = rsv; ret = btrfs_truncate_inode_items(trans, root, inode, 0, 0); - if (ret != -ENOSPC && ret != -EAGAIN) + if (ret) { + trans->block_rsv = &fs_info->trans_block_rsv; + btrfs_end_transaction(trans); + btrfs_btree_balance_dirty(fs_info); + if (ret != -ENOSPC && ret != -EAGAIN) { + btrfs_orphan_del(NULL, BTRFS_I(inode)); + btrfs_free_block_rsv(fs_info, rsv); + goto no_delete; + } + } else { break; - - trans->block_rsv = &fs_info->trans_block_rsv; - btrfs_end_transaction(trans); - trans = NULL; - btrfs_btree_balance_dirty(fs_info); + } } btrfs_free_block_rsv(fs_info, rsv); @@ -5383,12 +5388,8 @@ void btrfs_evict_inode(struct inode *inode) * Errors here aren't a big deal, it just means we leave orphan items * in the tree. They will be cleaned up on the next mount. */ - if (ret == 0) { - trans->block_rsv = root->orphan_block_rsv; - btrfs_orphan_del(trans, BTRFS_I(inode)); - } else { - btrfs_orphan_del(NULL, BTRFS_I(inode)); - } + trans->block_rsv = root->orphan_block_rsv; + btrfs_orphan_del(trans, BTRFS_I(inode)); trans->block_rsv = &fs_info->trans_block_rsv; if (!(root == fs_info->tree_root || -- 2.17.0