linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Tomáš Hrdina" <thomas.rkh@gmail.com>
To: Chris Murphy <lists@colorremedies.com>
Cc: Btrfs BTRFS <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Unable to mount degraded RAID5
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2016 23:10:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6253136e-51bd-29cc-e8d2-d2cf9a6a0aef@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJCQCtTPXY7=9vi9Ai2VrCEHzsEj_J0gurAVH5JGLJYmKmUpPw@mail.gmail.com>

One disk got reallocated sectors in SMART, so i did extended smart test
and it passed. Then I ran scrub and it found nothing. Everything was ok.
After this, it was started another extended smart test, weekly
scheduled, and I thing that sometime during this, disk went offline.

Maybe problem can be, that another disk have smart stat: Reported
Uncorrect on 1.


sudo mount -o ro,degraded,recovery /dev/sda /shares
mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sda,
       missing codepage or helper program, or other error

       In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try
       dmesg | tail or so.
 
sudo btrfs-show-super -fa /dev/sda and sdb
http://sebsauvage.net/paste/?39c73a3440b2e903#WZnUJXNFPNz/fFuOK3QquVeOWQUopcCl0JabtuYMWew=

sudo btrfs-find-root /dev/sda
warning, device 3 is missing
Couldn't read chunk tree
ERROR: open ctree failed

Thank you
Tomáš

------------------------------------------------------------------------

 *From:* Chris Murphy
 *Sent:*  Monday, July 04, 2016 10:43PM
 *To:* Tomáš Hrdina
*Cc:* Chris Murphy, Btrfs Btrfs
 *Subject:* Re: Unable to mount degraded RAID5

On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 1:11 PM, Tomáš Hrdina <thomas.rkh@gmail.com> wrote:
> Result from dmesg:
> http://sebsauvage.net/paste/?4e8e95b5eafbf675#ybToBzZ/WAoRjjugeH6N2YXZKEBlswaNI/J41GBmFYU=

[10849.041749] BTRFS info (device sda): allowing degraded mounts
[10849.041754] BTRFS info (device sda): disk space caching is enabled
[10849.041756] BTRFS: has skinny extents
[10849.090553] BTRFS error (device sda): bad tree block start
10160120763642806272 12678831570944
[10849.090676] BTRFS error (device sda): bad tree block start
10160120763642806272 12678831570944
[10849.090700] BTRFS: failed to read chunk tree on sda
[10849.100153] BTRFS: open_ctree failed


Try 'mount -o ro,degraded,recovery


> 
> sudo btrfs check /dev/sda
> warning, device 3 is missing
> checksum verify failed on 12678831570944 found 3DC57E3E wanted 771D2379
> checksum verify failed on 12678831570944 found 3DC57E3E wanted 771D2379
> bytenr mismatch, want=12678831570944, have=10160133442474442752
> Couldn't read chunk tree
> Couldn't open file system

Want and have are way far apart. If the mount command above still
fails then I'd like to see:

# btrfs-show-super -fa /dev/sda
# btrfs-show-super -fa /dev/sdb

Pretty much look for any discrepancies in generation, root and
chunk_root addresses, both in the main part of the super as well as in
the backups.

# btrfs-find-root /dev/sda

Maybe it's possible to use a different tree to get it mounted. I don't
know what happened but merely a failing device should not either break
checksums or lose the ability to mount the proper tree; but for sure
one of the backups should work.

Have you done a scrub on this file system and do you know if anything
was fixed or if it always found no problem?





---
Tato zpráva byla zkontrolována na viry programem Avast Antivirus.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus


  reply	other threads:[~2016-07-04 21:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-04 18:09 Unable to mount degraded RAID5 Tomáš Hrdina
2016-07-04 18:41 ` Chris Murphy
     [not found]   ` <95f58623-95a4-b5d2-fa3a-bfb957840a31@gmail.com>
2016-07-04 19:01     ` Chris Murphy
2016-07-04 19:11       ` Tomáš Hrdina
2016-07-04 20:43         ` Chris Murphy
2016-07-04 21:10           ` Tomáš Hrdina [this message]
2016-07-04 22:42             ` Chris Murphy
2016-07-04 22:59               ` Chris Murphy
2016-07-05  7:12               ` Tomáš Hrdina
2016-07-05  3:48           ` Andrei Borzenkov
2016-07-05 15:13             ` Chris Murphy
2016-07-05 18:40               ` Tomáš Hrdina
2016-07-05 23:19                 ` Chris Murphy
2016-07-06  8:07                   ` Tomáš Hrdina
2016-07-06 16:08                     ` Chris Murphy
2016-07-06 17:50                       ` Tomáš Hrdina
2016-07-06 18:12                         ` Chris Murphy
2016-07-09 17:30                           ` Tomáš Hrdina
2016-07-09 18:33                             ` Chris Murphy
2016-07-10  7:01                               ` Tomáš Hrdina
2016-07-10 20:08                                 ` Chris Murphy
2016-07-11 17:17                                   ` Tomáš Hrdina
2016-07-11 19:25                                     ` Chris Murphy
     [not found] <CAFDLS-CtnVDtD8d=Wtp0tVokKJ6pjptpX7MR862dThBJvSPC5g@mail.gmail.com>
2016-07-06 17:12 ` Fwd: " Gonzalo Gomez-Arrue Azpiazu
2016-07-06 18:19   ` Chris Murphy
2016-07-07 12:24     ` Gonzalo Gomez-Arrue Azpiazu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6253136e-51bd-29cc-e8d2-d2cf9a6a0aef@gmail.com \
    --to=thomas.rkh@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lists@colorremedies.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).