linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
To: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.de>, Filipe Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>, Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] iomap: Check iblocksize before transforming page->private
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 09:42:48 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6527bbf4-682f-26fe-60f1-1aa1d597132e@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190626030303.2suclansmshwufqv@fiona>



On 26.06.19 г. 6:03 ч., Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote:
> On 21:04 25/06, Filipe Manana wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 8:58 PM Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.de> wrote:
>>>
>>> On  9:05 24/06, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 02:28:25PM -0500, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote:
>>>>> From: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> btrfs uses page->private as well to store extent_buffer. Make
>>>>> the check stricter to make sure we are using page->private for iop by
>>>>> comparing iblocksize < PAGE_SIZE.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
>>>>
>>>> If btrfs uses page->private itself and also uses functions that call
>>>> to_iomap_page we have a major problem, as we now have a usage conflict.
>>>>
>>>> How do you end up here?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Btrfs uses page->private to identify which extent_buffer it belongs to.
>>> So, if you read, it fills the page->private. Then you try to write to
>>> it, iomap will assume it to be iomap_page pointer.
>>>
>>> I don't think we can move extent_buffer out of page->private for btrfs.
>>> Any other ideas?
>>
>> The extent buffer is only for pages belonging to the btree inode (i.e.
>> pages that correspond to a btree node/lead).
>> Haven't looked in detail to this patchset, but you can't do buffered
>> writes or direct IO against the btree inode, can you?
>> So for file inodes, this problem doesn't exist.
> 
> Why do we call set_page_extent_mapped(page) in lock_and_cleanup_extent_if_needed() or __do_readpage()?
> 
> I must admit, the backtrace crashes that I saw had the page->private set to
> EXTENT_PAGE_PRIVATE rather than the extent_buffer pointer. Does that mean
> calling this function is not necessary in these codepaths?

On a quick look it seems PagePrivate is not used for ordinary data
pages. E.g. set_Page_extent_mapped seems to be a leftover from old code.
No one is actually checking the EXTENT_PAGE_PRIVATE flag. For data pages
what seems to be important is PagePrivate2 for the fixup worker. IMO
set_page_extent_mapped should be removed as well as references to
pageprivate in the context of ordinary data pages.

Chris, any ideas what set_page_extent_mapped was used for?

> 

  reply	other threads:[~2019-06-26  6:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-21 19:28 [PATCH 0/6] Btrfs iomap Goldwyn Rodrigues
2019-06-21 19:28 ` [PATCH 1/6] iomap: Use a IOMAP_COW/srcmap for a read-modify-write I/O Goldwyn Rodrigues
2019-06-22  0:46   ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-06-25 19:17     ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
2019-06-26  6:21     ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-24  7:07   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-25 19:14     ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
2019-06-26  1:36       ` Shiyang Ruan
2019-06-26  6:39       ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-26 16:10         ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
2019-06-26 17:34           ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-06-26 18:00       ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-06-26 18:42         ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
2019-06-21 19:28 ` [PATCH 2/6] iomap: Read page from srcmap for IOMAP_COW Goldwyn Rodrigues
2019-06-22  0:41   ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-06-21 19:28 ` [PATCH 3/6] iomap: Check iblocksize before transforming page->private Goldwyn Rodrigues
2019-06-22  0:21   ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-06-25 19:22     ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
2019-06-24  7:05   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-25 18:56     ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
2019-06-25 20:04       ` Filipe Manana
2019-06-26  3:03         ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
2019-06-26  6:42           ` Nikolay Borisov [this message]
2019-06-26  6:16       ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-21 19:28 ` [PATCH 4/6] btrfs: Add a simple buffered iomap write Goldwyn Rodrigues
2019-06-21 19:28 ` [PATCH 5/6] btrfs: Add CoW in iomap based writes Goldwyn Rodrigues
2019-06-21 19:28 ` [PATCH 6/6] btrfs: remove buffered write code made unnecessary Goldwyn Rodrigues

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6527bbf4-682f-26fe-60f1-1aa1d597132e@suse.com \
    --to=nborisov@suse.com \
    --cc=clm@fb.com \
    --cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=fdmanana@gmail.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rgoldwyn@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).