From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from csamuel.org ([74.50.50.137]:58222 "EHLO csamuel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752367AbaHDKu6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Aug 2014 06:50:58 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by csamuel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACDB84003F for ; Mon, 4 Aug 2014 20:50:57 +1000 (EST) Received: from csamuel.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (csamuel.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with LMTP id 16065-07 for ; Mon, 4 Aug 2014 20:50:57 +1000 (EST) Received: from quad.localnet (2001-44b8-41dd-d500-9ddd-740d-de8b-0d3a.static.ipv6.internode.on.net [IPv6:2001:44b8:41dd:d500:9ddd:740d:de8b:d3a]) by csamuel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4594640030 for ; Mon, 4 Aug 2014 20:50:57 +1000 (EST) From: Chris Samuel To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: ENOSPC with mkdir and rename Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2014 20:50:55 +1000 Message-ID: <6565984.JHVfJyxURt@quad> In-Reply-To: References: <17833067.mzxAL4oqZq@quad> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 4 Aug 2014 11:09:23 AM Peter Waller wrote: > I accept that. It's all very well if you read the BTRFS list and/or > are a BTRFS developer. But if you're trying to work it out in the heat > of battle, as we have sysadmins who would have to, there is a > combination of things here that makes it unreasonable and harmful for > production. To be honest I'm not sure I'd suggest btrfs for production use at all at present, it's only recently been unmarked as experimental and to be honest I feel that was premature. :-( All the best, Chris -- Chris Samuel : http://www.csamuel.org/ : Melbourne, VIC