From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:55973 "EHLO mout.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751845AbdIVU3l (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Sep 2017 16:29:41 -0400 Received: from thetick.localnet ([93.181.44.247]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LnDof-1dReXO3u3R-00hO8g for ; Fri, 22 Sep 2017 22:29:40 +0200 From: Marc Joliet To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: defragmenting best practice? Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2017 22:29:34 +0200 Message-ID: <6912497.aQNEZV21sa@thetick> In-Reply-To: References: <20170831070558.GB5783@rus.uni-stuttgart.de> <20170921221013.5576f90e@jupiter.sol.kaishome.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1818318.LJRaCilf5L"; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --nextPart1818318.LJRaCilf5L Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Am Freitag, 22. September 2017, 13:22:52 CEST schrieb Austin S. Hemmelgarn: > > I'm not sure where Firefox puts its cache, I only use it on very rare > > occasions. But I think it's going to .cache/mozilla last time looked > > at it. > > I'm pretty sure that is correct. FWIW, on my system Firefox's cache looks like this: % du -hsc (find .cache/mozilla/firefox/ -type f) | wc -l 9008 % du -hsc (find .cache/mozilla/firefox/ -type f) | sort -h | tail 5,4M .cache/mozilla/firefox/cb236e4s.default-1464421886682/cache2/entries/ 83CEC8ADA08D9A9658458AB872BE107A216E71C6 5,5M .cache/mozilla/firefox/cb236e4s.default-1464421886682/cache2/entries/ C60061B33D3BB91ED45951C922BAA1BB40022CB7 5,7M .cache/mozilla/firefox/cb236e4s.default-1464421886682/cache2/entries/ 0900D9EA8E3222EB8690348C2482C69308B15A20 5,7M .cache/mozilla/firefox/cb236e4s.default-1464421886682/cache2/entries/ F8E90D121B884360E36BCB1735CC5A8B1B7A744B 5,8M .cache/mozilla/firefox/cb236e4s.default-1464421886682/cache2/entries/ 903C4CD01ABD74E353C7484C6E21A053AAC5DCC2 6,1M .cache/mozilla/firefox/cb236e4s.default-1464421886682/cache2/entries/ 3A0D4193B009700155811D14A28DBE38C37C0067 6,1M .cache/mozilla/firefox/cb236e4s.default-1464421886682/startupCache/ scriptCache-current.bin 6,5M .cache/mozilla/firefox/cb236e4s.default-1464421886682/cache2/entries/ 304405168662C3624D57AF98A74345464F32A0DB 8,8M .cache/mozilla/firefox/ik7qsfwb.Temp/cache2/entries/ BD7CA4125B3AA87D6B16C987741F33C65DBFFFDD 427M insgesamt So lots of files, many of which are (I suppose) relatively large, but do not look "everything in one database" large to me. (This is with Firefox 55.0.2.) -- Marc Joliet -- "People who think they know everything really annoy those of us who know we don't" - Bjarne Stroustrup --nextPart1818318.LJRaCilf5L Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEax7Ya5gDQFOJHKGQv9DmhiyIePQFAlnFcq4ACgkQv9DmhiyI ePQUuA/+I5bQUtxjApOruoicirRsgI2PC+ng9MqOgS6T27KSqEfv50TRb5s+/LZE JzmNxuHidc2GuZekIKk9D8FfbYYPc4VRfC46bRBRj29qHXej0VsgAqfGNuyjuAAv FZtgFjSIObmQOiF/G1JWmfsg82xvmToyC00jqa9n2D1IoUz+B+0LHMr09oIa2jMY cX8XNxN3GShXAcw+csX9faOLeTEmDkgG44iLuACrfOOSFR+UB7/v84CRhQCfNfU2 Tps2unD69y7ht4/BJ5Xgr6dv2HTgim9q6g3tBB1nawlCO0RKUbaGq9DSwzBn34TD X5r/usqq3gXeLhaQ7Y0GzgjqWV7Dgi29Bp9cZYN+tEYp9BIkK9X0z5qo/sO2Llno hAap/O2uAjj02YLcgy7LXEuLZPxrMLFiBXYlh6JBkujQEnzBU+dbGV/pvYRPNeEu r9BNA09dWe8hXdRVIhGdIkXokRqIEHfQupo+B7TqNpmMkxA/0hjd/dvXnX/p9wGc HDTV0HQfoO6ldkHh+9JYhk2WU7lE5sanxtcXR5kK66wNpdRltW4xmGY86lc05Ecc LsePmujOs0+WsNMH6eJJitXfKb+lPEw6UDq2/ORVgHRVB0JzmQkOTJP8MO61x84b RsyQdlU1hdOfSrnxzBUajLaTfFA3MgjJgupbRgWpr77j5JzDYzs= =xNTm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1818318.LJRaCilf5L--