Re: [PATCH] btrfs: correct wrong comment about magic number of index_cnt

[Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>]

Sorry, the two patches are same.
Please the latter one.

Thanks,
Su

On 01/12/2018 11:08 AM, Su Yue wrote:
> There is no function named btrfs_get_inode_index_count.
> Explanation for magic number index_cnt=2 in btrfs_new_inode() is
> actually located in btrfs_set_inode_index_count().
> 
> So replace 'btrfs_get_inode_index_count' in the comment by
> 'btrfs_set_inode_index_count'.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
>   fs/btrfs/inode.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> index 37bdb78b4766..f6454719192e 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> @@ -6315,7 +6315,7 @@ static struct inode *btrfs_new_inode(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
>   	}
>   	/*
>   	 * index_cnt is ignored for everything but a dir,
> -	 * btrfs_get_inode_index_count has an explanation for the magic
> +	 * btrfs_set_inode_index_count has an explanation for the magic
>   	 * number
>   	 */
>   	BTRFS_I(inode)->index_cnt = 2;
>