From: Hongling Zeng <zhongling0719@126.com>
To: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>,
clm@fb.com, dsterba@suse.com, naohiro.aota@wdc.com,
josef@toxicpanda.com
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: fix use-after-free in mark_block_group_to_copy
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2026 11:37:56 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6A828214.40702@126.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <586ff25f-3a54-4ab7-b533-abdf692dbd22@suse.com>
在 2026年08月17日 11:09, Qu Wenruo 写道:
>
>
> 在 2026/8/17 12:15, Hongling Zeng 写道:
>> Thanks for the review.
>>
>> This patch was developed with assistance from Claude AI.
>>
>> The AI helped with:
>> - Analyzing the code paths to understand the use-after-free scenario
>> - Identifying potential deadlock risks with different locking
>> approaches
>> - Cross-referencing similar locking patterns in send.c and backref.c
>> - Drafting the commit message
>>
>> I modified the code to add the commit_root_sem locking myself,
>> reviewed and
>> tested the changes before submission.
>>
>> Apologies for not disclosing AI assistance earlier. I will ensure
>> to do so in
>> future submissions.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Hongling Zeng
>>
>> 在 2026年08月17日 09:46, Hongling Zeng 写道:
>>> mark_block_group_to_copy() iterates over the commit root with
>>> skip_locking=true to avoid lock contention. Without holding
>>> commit_root_sem,a concurrent transaction commit can swap and free
>>> the commit root during iteration, leading to use-after-free when
>>> accessing extent buffers.
>>>
>>> The fix adds commit_root_sem locking, but CRITICALLY must only cover
>>> the
>>> actual search period (btrfs_for_each_slot), NOT the preceding while
>>> loop
>>> which calls btrfs_commit_transaction(). If held during that loop, we
>>> get
>>> self-deadlock: down_read(commit_root_sem) → btrfs_commit_transaction()
>>> → switch_commit_roots() → down_write(commit_root_sem), blocking forever
>>> on our own read lock.
>>>
>>> Lock scope:
>>> - down_read() after path setup, before btrfs_for_each_slot
>>> - up_read() immediately after btrfs_for_each_slot completes
>>> - NOT held during while loop (btrfs_commit_transaction) path
>>> - NOT held on the !path error path (goto unlock before lock
>>> acquisition)
>>>
>>> This matches the established btrfs pattern used in send.c,
>>> backref.c, etc.:
>>> hold commit_root_sem read lock ONLY while searching commit root, never
>>> across transaction commits.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 78ce9fc269af ("btrfs: zoned: mark block groups to copy for
>>> device-replace")
>>> Cc:stable@vger.kernel.org
>>> Signed-off-by: Hongling Zeng<zenghongling@kylinos.cn>
>>> ---
>>> fs/btrfs/dev-replace.c | 3 +++
>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/dev-replace.c b/fs/btrfs/dev-replace.c
>>> index dc0834f920c3..734807bf48b3 100644
>>> --- a/fs/btrfs/dev-replace.c
>>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/dev-replace.c
>>> @@ -499,6 +499,7 @@ static int mark_block_group_to_copy(struct
>>> btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
>>> key.type = BTRFS_DEV_EXTENT_KEY;
>>> key.offset = 0;
>>> + down_read(&fs_info->commit_root_sem);
>
> And there is already path::need_commit_sem, which does a smaller
> critical section than holding it manually.
Thanks for the review.
I've updated the patch to use path->need_commit_sem as suggested. This is
indeed a better approach than manual commit_root_sem locking.
V2 patch is attached.
Best regards,
Hongling Zeng
>
>>> btrfs_for_each_slot(root, &key, &found_key, path, iter_ret) {
>>> struct extent_buffer *leaf = path->nodes[0];
>>> @@ -525,6 +526,8 @@ static int mark_block_group_to_copy(struct
>>> btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
>>> if (iter_ret < 0)
>>> ret = iter_ret;
>>> + up_read(&fs_info->commit_root_sem);
>>> +
>>> btrfs_free_path(path);
>>> unlock:
>>> mutex_unlock(&fs_info->chunk_mutex);
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-17 3:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-17 1:46 [PATCH] btrfs: fix use-after-free in mark_block_group_to_copy Hongling Zeng
[not found] ` <6A8275D6.4060709@126.com>
2026-08-17 3:09 ` Qu Wenruo
2026-08-17 3:37 ` Hongling Zeng [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-08-17 1:45 Hongling Zeng
2026-08-17 1:58 ` Qu Wenruo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6A828214.40702@126.com \
--to=zhongling0719@126.com \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=naohiro.aota@wdc.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wqu@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox