From: Hongling Zeng <zhongling0719@126.com>
To: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>,
Hongling Zeng <zenghongling@kylinos.cn>,
clm@fb.com, dsterba@suse.com, lizetao1@huawei.com
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: handle highmem folios in read_key_bytes
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2026 12:14:51 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6A828ABB.10507@126.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8e30fed1-5879-4a26-a1a2-d1a3302bc068@gmx.com>
在 2026年08月17日 10:55, Qu Wenruo 写道:
>
>
> 在 2026/8/17 11:50, Hongling Zeng 写道:
>> On 32-bit systems with highmem, folio_address() can return NULL for
>> unmapped highmem folios. When this NULL is passed as the dest parameter
>> to read_key_bytes() with a non-NULL dest_folio, it violates the
>> function's
>> contract (which requires dest to be non-NULL when dest_folio is
>> provided).
>
> But metadata folios are not allocated by page cache, but by btrfs
> itself, which always use GFP_NOFS then attach the folio to page cache,
> thus should not get highmem memory in the first place.
>
> And there is no way to trigger read from userspace on btree inode, so
> there should be no highmem folios from the beginning.
Thanks for the review.
I was not able to reproduce this on a real system. This was
identified through code analysis with assistance from glm 5.5, not from a
real-world encounter.
Your analysis about btrfs using ~__GFP_FS for folio allocation and
the lack
of userspace trigger paths makes sense. The proposed changes are
based on the
generic folio_address() behavior and the theoretical dest/dest_folio
invariant, but I do not currently have evidence that a highmem folio can
reach read_key_bytes() in this state.
I will withdraw this patch rather than claim a reachable highmem bug
without a reproducer.
>
>>
>> The original bug had two symptoms:
>> 1. Unsigned len underflow when len -= copy_bytes executes (infinite
>> loop)
>> 2. The folio remains uninitialized because the copy block is skipped
>
> So did you really hit the problem in the real world?
>
>>
>> Fix requires two changes:
>>
>> 1. Change "if (!dest)" to "if (!dest && !dest_folio)"
>> - Prevents the "counting-only" mode when dest_folio is provided
>> - Fixes the underflow/infinite loop
>>
>> 2. Change "if (dest)" to "if (dest || dest_folio)"
>> - Ensures the copy block executes when dest_folio is provided
>> - Allows kmap_local_folio() to properly map the highmem folio
>> - Actually writes data to the folio
>>
>> Without the second change, the highmem folio is not populated even
>> though the read succeeds, causing subsequent fs-verity verification to
>> operate on stale or uninitialized data.
>>
>> Fixes: 884937793db5 ("btrfs: convert read_key_bytes() to take a folio")
>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Hongling Zeng <zenghongling@kylinos.cn>
>
> Missing LLM disclosure.
>> ---
>> fs/btrfs/verity.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/verity.c b/fs/btrfs/verity.c
>> index 983365a73541..80bc945c7dcb 100644
>> --- a/fs/btrfs/verity.c
>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/verity.c
>> @@ -351,7 +351,7 @@ static int read_key_bytes(struct btrfs_inode
>> *inode, u8 key_type, u64 offset,
>> }
>> /* desc = NULL to just sum all the item lengths */
>> - if (!dest)
>> + if (!dest && !dest_folio)
>> copy_end = item_end;
>> else
>> copy_end = min(offset + len, item_end);
>> @@ -362,7 +362,7 @@ static int read_key_bytes(struct btrfs_inode
>> *inode, u8 key_type, u64 offset,
>> /* Offset from the start of item for copying */
>> copy_offset = offset - key.offset;
>> - if (dest) {
>> + if (dest || dest_folio) {
>> if (dest_folio)
>> kaddr = kmap_local_folio(dest_folio, 0);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-17 4:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-17 2:20 [PATCH] btrfs: handle highmem folios in read_key_bytes Hongling Zeng
2026-08-17 2:55 ` Qu Wenruo
2026-08-17 4:14 ` Hongling Zeng [this message]
2026-08-17 6:02 ` Qu Wenruo
2026-08-17 6:37 ` Hongling Zeng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6A828ABB.10507@126.com \
--to=zhongling0719@126.com \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizetao1@huawei.com \
--cc=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zenghongling@kylinos.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox