From: Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijack@inwind.it>
To: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Cc: Chris Murphy <lists@colorremedies.com>,
Piotr Szymaniak <szarpaj@grubelek.pl>,
Btrfs BTRFS <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: btrfs fi du -s gives Inappropriate ioctl for device
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 09:09:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6b16fa81-a1a5-3243-0f7d-59a7ec9ae168@inwind.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e965d461-7185-59ef-d025-d51a886aacb7@suse.com>
On 08/18/2017 08:34 AM, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>
>
> On 17.08.2017 23:59, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 08/17/2017 08:43 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>> # btrfs sub create test1
>>> Create subvolume './test1'
>>> # btrfs sub create test1/test2
>>> Create subvolume 'test1/test2'
>>> # btrfs sub snap test1 test1.snap
>>> Create a snapshot of 'test1' in './test1.snap'
>>> # btrfs fi du -s test1
>>> Total Exclusive Set shared Filename
>>> 0.00B 0.00B 0.00B test1
>>> # btrfs fi du -s test1.snap
>>> Total Exclusive Set shared Filename
>>> ERROR: cannot check space of 'test1.snap': Inappropriate ioctl for device
>>> #
>>>
>>
>> tanks for the test case. Now I was able to reproduce the problem. The bug(s) are two:
>>
>> 1) to get the treeid of the files/directory, the function lookup_path_rootid() is used, which behaves strangely when it is called on a directory that is BTRFS_EMPTY_SUBVOL_DIR_OBJECTID. In fact this function is commented as following:
>> [....]
>> /*
>> * For a given:
>> * - file or directory return the containing tree root id
>> * - subvolume return its own tree id
>> * - BTRFS_EMPTY_SUBVOL_DIR_OBJECTID (directory with ino == 2) the result is
>> * undefined and function returns -1
>> */
>> int lookup_path_rootid(int fd, u64 *rootid)
>> {
>> [....]
>>
>> The caller (du_add_file()) doesn't consider this case.
>>
>> 2) in the function du_walk_dir(), an error returned by du_add_file() is ignored, but the return value is not reset. So if the last entry has ino BTRFS_EMPTY_SUBVOL_DIR_OBJECTID (directory with ino == 2) an error is returned. But if there is another directory item no error is returned !
>>
>> See the following tests cases:
>>
>> # btrfs sub create test1
>> # btrfs sub create test1/test2
>> # btrfs sub snap test1 test1.snap
>> # btrfs fi du -s test1
>> Total Exclusive Set shared Filename
>> 0.00B 0.00B 0.00B test1
>> # btrfs fi du -s test1.snap
>> Total Exclusive Set shared Filename
>> ERROR: cannot check space of 'test1.snap': Inappropriate ioctl for device
>>
>> But if you add *another* file/dir in test1.snap you got:
>>
>> # mkdir test1.snap/dir
>> # btrfs fi du -s test1.snap
>> Total Exclusive Set shared Filename
>> 0.00B 0.00B 0.00B test1.snap
>>
>> The error disappea> Patches will follow shortly
>
> It would be awesome if you manage to introduce xfstests for this case
I am not sure if this is the right thing to do: the bugs are related to
a) an incorrect error handling of the function lookup_path_rootid()
b) the strange behavior of the BTRFS_EMPTY_SUBVOL_DIR_OBJECTID directory
For a) it is impossible to check for each lookup_path_rootid() call from a xfstest; for b) I am quite sure that there are a lot of corner case not properly handled in btrfs progs (and still btrfs fi-du handle it wrongly)
BR
G.Baroncelli
>
>>
>>>
>>> # uname -r
>>> 4.13.0-0.rc4.git1.1.fc27.x86_64
>>> # rpm -q btrfs-progs
>>> btrfs-progs-4.12-1.fc27.x86_64
>>>
>>>
>>> ----
>>> Chris Murphy
>>>
>>
>>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
gpg @keyserver.linux.it: Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijackATinwind.it>
Key fingerprint BBF5 1610 0B64 DAC6 5F7D 17B2 0EDA 9B37 8B82 E0B5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-18 7:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-14 22:57 btrfs fi du -s gives Inappropriate ioctl for device Piotr Szymaniak
2017-08-14 23:40 ` Chris Murphy
2017-08-16 9:27 ` Piotr Szymaniak
2017-08-17 0:23 ` Chris Murphy
2017-08-17 15:37 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2017-08-17 18:43 ` Chris Murphy
2017-08-17 20:59 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2017-08-18 6:34 ` Nikolay Borisov
2017-08-18 7:09 ` Goffredo Baroncelli [this message]
2017-08-18 7:12 ` Nikolay Borisov
2017-08-18 7:22 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2017-08-18 8:38 ` Piotr Szymaniak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6b16fa81-a1a5-3243-0f7d-59a7ec9ae168@inwind.it \
--to=kreijack@inwind.it \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lists@colorremedies.com \
--cc=nborisov@suse.com \
--cc=szarpaj@grubelek.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).