From: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
To: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>, fstests@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 rev log added] fstests: btrfs verify hardening agaist duplicate fsid
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 23:34:04 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6b58c095-d0a1-6330-0385-b06aa9c99483@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c2e09b66-6c15-9bbe-c340-0a6015ea4a0e@suse.com>
On 10/26/2018 11:02 PM, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>
>
> On 8.10.18 г. 21:28 ч., Anand Jain wrote:
>> We have a known bug in btrfs, that we let the device path be changed
>> after the device has been mounted. So using this loop hole the new
>> copied device would appears as if its mounted immediately after its
>> been copied. So this test case reproduces this issue.
>>
>> For example:
>>
>> Initially.. /dev/mmcblk0p4 is mounted as /
>>
>> lsblk
>> NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
>> mmcblk0 179:0 0 29.2G 0 disk
>> |-mmcblk0p4 179:4 0 4G 0 part /
>> |-mmcblk0p2 179:2 0 500M 0 part /boot
>> |-mmcblk0p3 179:3 0 256M 0 part [SWAP]
>> `-mmcblk0p1 179:1 0 256M 0 part /boot/efi
>>
>> btrfs fi show
>> Label: none uuid: 07892354-ddaa-4443-90ea-f76a06accaba
>> Total devices 1 FS bytes used 1.40GiB
>> devid 1 size 4.00GiB used 3.00GiB path /dev/mmcblk0p4
>>
>> Copy mmcblk0 to sda
>> dd if=/dev/mmcblk0 of=/dev/sda
>>
>> And immediately after the copy completes the change in the device
>> superblock is notified which the automount scans using
>> btrfs device scan and the new device sda becomes the mounted root
>> device.
>>
>> lsblk
>> NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
>> sda 8:0 1 14.9G 0 disk
>> |-sda4 8:4 1 4G 0 part /
>> |-sda2 8:2 1 500M 0 part
>> |-sda3 8:3 1 256M 0 part
>> `-sda1 8:1 1 256M 0 part
>> mmcblk0 179:0 0 29.2G 0 disk
>> |-mmcblk0p4 179:4 0 4G 0 part
>> |-mmcblk0p2 179:2 0 500M 0 part /boot
>> |-mmcblk0p3 179:3 0 256M 0 part [SWAP]
>> `-mmcblk0p1 179:1 0 256M 0 part /boot/efi
>> btrfs fi show /
>> Label: none uuid: 07892354-ddaa-4443-90ea-f76a06accaba
>> Total devices 1 FS bytes used 1.40GiB
>> devid 1 size 4.00GiB used 3.00GiB path /dev/sda4
>>
>> The bug is quite nasty that you can't either unmount /dev/sda4 or
>> /dev/mmcblk0p4. And the problem does not get solved until you take
>> the sda out of the system on to another system to change its fsid using
>> the 'btrfstune -u' command.
>
> Is there a pending fix for this?
Yes.
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10641041/
Test case header mentioned it.
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
>> ---
>> v1->v2:
>> dont play around with dev patch use it as it is.
>> do not use SCRATCH_MNT instead create it at the TEST_DIR and its related
>> changes.
>> golden out changes
>>
>> tests/btrfs/173 | 88 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> tests/btrfs/173.out | 6 ++++
>> tests/btrfs/group | 1 +
>> 3 files changed, 95 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100755 tests/btrfs/173
>> create mode 100644 tests/btrfs/173.out
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/173 b/tests/btrfs/173
>> new file mode 100755
>> index 000000000000..b466ae921e19
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/tests/btrfs/173
>> @@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
>> +#! /bin/bash
>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +# Copyright (c) 2018 Oracle. All Rights Reserved.
>> +#
>> +# FS QA Test 173
>> +#
>> +# Fuzzy test for FS image duplication.
>> +# Could be fixed by
>> +# [patch] btrfs: harden agaist duplicate fsid
>> +#
>> +seq=`basename $0`
>> +seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq
>> +echo "QA output created by $seq"
>> +
>> +here=`pwd`
>> +tmp=/tmp/$$
>> +status=1 # failure is the default!
>> +trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15
>> +
>> +mnt=$TEST_DIR/$seq.mnt
>> +_cleanup()
>> +{
>> + rm -rf $mnt > /dev/null 2>&1
>> + cd /
>> + rm -f $tmp.*
>> +}
>> +
>> +# get standard environment, filters and checks
>> +. ./common/rc
>> +. ./common/filter
>> +
>> +# remove previous $seqres.full before test
>> +rm -f $seqres.full
>> +
>> +# real QA test starts here
>> +
>> +# Modify as appropriate.
>> +_supported_fs btrfs
>> +_supported_os Linux
>> +_require_scratch_dev_pool 2
>> +_scratch_dev_pool_get 2
>> +
>> +dev_foo=$(echo $SCRATCH_DEV_POOL | awk '{print $1}')
>> +dev_bar=$(echo $SCRATCH_DEV_POOL | awk '{print $2}')
>
> Naming devices _foo and _bar just shows you could not care less about
> the test.
Hmm. Will make it device_1 and device_2.
> Either use sane names - primary_dev/secondary dev or device_1
> and device_2.
>> +
>> +echo dev_foo=$dev_foo >> $seqres.full
>> +echo dev_bar=$dev_bar >> $seqres.full
>> +echo | tee -a $seqres.full
>> +
>> +rm -rf $mnt > /dev/null 2>&1
>
> So what is $mnt? I can see it's used by very few tests and it's not
> obvious? Generally you should either define it as a local variable or
> use one of the SCRATCH_MNT/TEST_MNT global variables. Also I checked
> with Eric re. the use of $mnt in tests and his conclusion is :
>
> "<sandeen> looks like a bug"
No its not. As few lines above, I have assigned it as..
mnt=$TEST_DIR/$seq.mnt
>> +mkdir $mnt
>> +_mkfs_dev $dev_foo
>> +_mount $dev_foo $mnt
>> +
>> +check_btrfs_mount()
>> +{
>> + local x=$(findmnt $mnt | grep -v TARGET | awk '{print $2}')
>> + [[ $x == $dev_foo ]] && echo DEV_FOO
>> + [[ $x == $dev_bar ]] && echo DEV_BAR
>> +}
>
> Same thing here re. DEV_(FOO|BAR).
>
>> +
>> +echo MNT $(check_btrfs_mount)
>> +
>> +for sb_bytenr in 65536 67108864
>> +do
>> + echo -n "dd status=none if=$dev_foo of=$dev_bar bs=1 "\
>> + "seek=$sb_bytenr skip=$sb_bytenr count=4096" >> $seqres.full
>> + dd status=none if=$dev_foo of=$dev_bar bs=1 seek=$sb_bytenr \
>> + skip=$sb_bytenr count=4096 >> $seqres.full 2>&1
>> + echo ..:$? >> $seqres.full
>
> This is an overkill, just use dd ... >/dev/null 2>&1, no one cares about
> the output of that. Also use DIO so that sb's are directly written to
> the devices.
Yeah right will fix.
>> +done
>> +
>> +#Original device is mounted, scan of its clone should fail
>> +$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG device scan $dev_bar >> $seqres.full 2>&1
>> +echo btrfs device scan dev_bar ...:$?| tee -a $seqres.full
>> +
>> +echo MNT $(check_btrfs_mount)
>> +
>> +#Original device scan should be successful
>> +$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG device scan $dev_foo >> $seqres.full 2>&1
>> +echo btrfs device scan dev_foo ...:$?| tee -a $seqres.full
>> +
>> +umount $mnt > /dev/null 2>&1
>> +_scratch_dev_pool_put
>> +
>> +# success, all done
>> +status=0
>> +exit
>> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/173.out b/tests/btrfs/173.out
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..3c7e3fb4e3f7
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/tests/btrfs/173.out
>> @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
>> +QA output created by 173
>> +
>> +MNT DEV_FOO
>> +btrfs device scan dev_bar ...:1
>> +MNT DEV_FOO
>> +btrfs device scan dev_foo ...:0
>
> It seems the output is really pointless it should just be "Silence is
> golden". Then in the test you would do all your run-time checks of
> what's the source of the mount etc etc and if your expectations don't
> match you fail the test and don't output "Silence is golden" which would
> signal success. Check for example
I could do that. Will fix.
Thanks, Anand
>> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/group b/tests/btrfs/group
>> index 45782565c3b7..b2f1393f3e97 100644
>> --- a/tests/btrfs/group
>> +++ b/tests/btrfs/group
>> @@ -175,3 +175,4 @@
>> 170 auto quick snapshot
>> 171 auto quick qgroup
>> 172 auto quick punch
>> +173 volume
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-26 15:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-01 8:44 [PATCH] fstests: btrfs verify hardening agaist duplicate fsid Anand Jain
2018-10-06 10:14 ` Eryu Guan
2018-10-08 18:28 ` Anand Jain
2018-10-08 18:14 ` [PATCH v2] " Anand Jain
2018-10-08 18:28 ` [PATCH v2 rev log added] " Anand Jain
2018-10-21 10:25 ` Eryu Guan
2018-10-26 15:02 ` Nikolay Borisov
2018-10-26 15:34 ` Anand Jain [this message]
2018-10-26 15:52 ` Nikolay Borisov
2018-10-26 15:57 ` Anand Jain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6b58c095-d0a1-6330-0385-b06aa9c99483@oracle.com \
--to=anand.jain@oracle.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nborisov@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).