From: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Guilherme G . Piccoli" <gpiccoli@igalia.com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>, Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] btrfs: support cloned-device mount capability
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2023 20:52:11 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6b78aaa3-32bf-30cb-a6f2-1d8a4f1675b8@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1695826320.git.anand.jain@oracle.com>
Gentle ping on any comments
Thanks, Anand
On 28/09/2023 09:09, Anand Jain wrote:
> Guilherme's previous work [1] aimed at the mounting of cloned devices
> using a superblock flag SINGLE_DEV during mkfs.
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/20230831001544.3379273-1-gpiccoli@igalia.com/
>
> Building upon this work, here is in-memory only approach. As it mounts
> we determine if the same fsid is already mounted if then we generate a
> random temp fsid which shall be used the mount, in-memory only not
> written to the disk. We distinguish device by devt.
>
> Mount option / superblock flag:
> -------------------------------
> These patches show we don't have to limit the single-device / temp_fsid
> capability with a mount option or a superblock flag from the btrfs
> internals pov. However, if necessary from the user's perspective,
> we can add them later on top of this patch. I've prepared a mount option
> -o temp_fsid patch, but I'm not included at this time. As most of the
> tests was without it.
>
> Compatible with other features that may be affected:
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Multi device:
> A btrfs filesytem on a single device can be copied using dd and
> mounted simlutaneously. However, a multi device btrfs copied using
> dd and trying to mount simlutaneously is forced to fail:
>
> mount: /btrfs1: mount(2) system call failed: File exists.
>
> Send and receive:
> Quick tests shows send and receive between two single devices with
> the same fsid mounted on the _same_ host works!.
> (Also, the receive-mnt can receive from multiple senders as long as
> conflits are managed externally. ;-).)
>
> Replace:
> Works fine.
>
> btrfs-progs:
> ------------
> btrfs-progs needs to be updated to support the commands such as
>
> btrfs filesystem show
>
> when devices are not mounted. So the device list is not based on
> the fisd any more.
>
> Testing:
> -------
> This patch has been under testing for some time. The challenge is to get
> the fstests to test this reasonably well.
>
> As of now, this patch runs fine on a large set of fstests test cases
> using a custom-built mkfs.btrfs with the -U option and a new -P option
> to copy the device FSID and UUID from the TEST_DEV to the SCRATCH_DEV
> at the scratch_mkfs time. For example:
>
> Config file:
>
> config_fsid=$(btrfs in dump-super $TEST_DEV | grep -E ^fsid | \
> awk '{print $2}')
> config_uuid=$(btrfs in dump-super $TEST_DEV | \
> grep -E ^dev_item.uuid | awk '{print $2}')
> MKFS_OPTIONS="-U $config_fsid -P $config_uuid"
>
> This configuration option ensures that both TEST_DEV and SCRATCH_DEV will
> have the same FSID and device UUID while still applying test-specific
> scratch mkfs options.
>
> Mkfs.btrfs:
> -----------
> mkfs.btrfs needs to be updated to support the -P option for testing only.
>
> btrfs-progs: allow duplicate fsid for single device
> btrfs-progs: add mkfs -P option for dev_uuid
>
> Anand Jain (2):
> btrfs: add helper function find_fsid_by_disk
> btrfs: support cloned-device mount capability
>
> fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 3 +-
> fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 75 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> fs/btrfs/volumes.h | 2 ++
> 3 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-02 12:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-28 1:09 [PATCH 0/2] btrfs: support cloned-device mount capability Anand Jain
2023-09-28 1:09 ` [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: add helper function find_fsid_by_disk Anand Jain
2023-10-02 11:45 ` David Sterba
2023-10-03 0:57 ` Anand Jain
2023-09-28 1:09 ` [PATCH 2/2] btrfs: support cloned-device mount capability Anand Jain
2023-10-02 12:57 ` David Sterba
2023-10-02 22:41 ` Anand Jain
2023-10-02 12:52 ` Anand Jain [this message]
2023-10-02 13:00 ` [PATCH 0/2] " David Sterba
2023-10-03 1:13 ` Anand Jain
2023-10-06 7:42 ` Guilherme G. Piccoli
2023-10-07 8:01 ` Anand Jain
2023-10-18 14:15 ` Guilherme G. Piccoli
2023-10-19 2:13 ` Anand Jain
2023-10-19 8:15 ` Guilherme G. Piccoli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6b78aaa3-32bf-30cb-a6f2-1d8a4f1675b8@oracle.com \
--to=anand.jain@oracle.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=gpiccoli@igalia.com \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wqu@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).