From: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] btrfs: exclude mmaps while doing remap
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2020 15:40:02 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6bc7fdb7-7c8f-92ec-e320-d1878b0b4584@toxicpanda.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201215202315.GA6905@magnolia>
On 12/15/20 3:23 PM, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 01:19:40PM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
>> Darrick reported a potential issue to me where we could allow mmap
>> writes after validating a page range matched in the case of dedupe.
>> Generally we rely on lock page -> lock extent with the ordered flush to
>> protect us, but this is done after we check the pages because we use the
>> generic helpers, so we could modify the page in between doing the check
>> and locking the range.
>
> FWIW I only found that via code inspection because Matthew Wilcox asked
> me about whether or not filesystems did the right thing. I wrote the
> attached fstest to try to demonstrate the problem on btrfs but it
> actually passes on xfs and btrfs. This means either that (a) btrfs is
> doing it right through some other means because I don't understand its
> locking or (b) the test is wrong.
>
> The test /does/ explode as expected on ocfs2 because mmap io lol there.
>
The problem exists, it's just the window is super narrow. If you put a
schedule_timeout(HZ) right after btrfs_remap_file_range_prep() you'd hit the
problem every time. We basically have to mkwrite right between doing the
vfs_dedupe_file_range_compare() and calling btrfs_extent_same(), which is going
to be hard to do. You aren't missing something, it's just hard to hit. Thanks,
Josef
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-15 20:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-14 18:19 [PATCH 0/4] Introduce a mmap sem to deal with some mmap issues Josef Bacik
2020-12-14 18:19 ` [PATCH 1/4] btrfs: add a i_mmap_lock to our inode Josef Bacik
2020-12-14 18:19 ` [PATCH 2/4] btrfs: cleanup inode_lock/inode_unlock uses Josef Bacik
2020-12-14 18:19 ` [PATCH 3/4] btrfs: exclude mmaps while doing remap Josef Bacik
2020-12-15 20:23 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-15 20:40 ` Josef Bacik [this message]
2020-12-14 18:19 ` [PATCH 4/4] btrfs: exclude mmap from happening during all fallocate operations Josef Bacik
2020-12-23 8:19 ` [PATCH 0/4] Introduce a mmap sem to deal with some mmap issues Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6bc7fdb7-7c8f-92ec-e320-d1878b0b4584@toxicpanda.com \
--to=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox