public inbox for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
To: fdmanana@kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Btrfs: make ranged fsyncs always respect the given range
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 13:44:54 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6fd4856c-ca48-0cca-f5e1-3208a55ea033@toxicpanda.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200309124108.18952-1-fdmanana@kernel.org>

On 3/9/20 8:41 AM, fdmanana@kernel.org wrote:
> From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
> 
> This patchset fixes a bug when not using NO_HOLES and makes ranged fsyncs
> respect the given file range when using the NO_HOLES feature.
> 
> The bug is about missing file extents items representing a hole after doing
> a ranged fsync on a file and replaying the log.
> 
> Btrfs doesn't respect the given range for a fsync when the inode's has the
> "need full sync" bit set - it treats the fsync as a full ranged one, operating
> on the whole file, doing more IO and cpu work then needed.
> 
> That behaviour was needed to fix a corruption bug. Commit 0c713cbab6200b
> ("Btrfs: fix race between ranged fsync and writeback of adjacent ranges")
> fixed that bug by turning the ranged fsync into a full ranged one.
> 
> Later the hole detection code of fsync was simplified a lot in order to
> fix another bug when using the NO_HOLES feature - done by commit
> 0e56315ca147b3 ("Btrfs: fix missing hole after hole punching and fsync when
> using NO_HOLES"). That commit now makes it easy to avoid turning the ranged
> fsyncs into non-ranged fsyncs.
> 
> This patchset does those two changes. The first patch fixes the bug mentioned
> before, patches 2 and 3 are preparation cleanups for patch 4, which is the
> one that makes fsync respect the given file range when using NO_HOLES.
> 
> V3: Updated patch one so that the ranged is set to full before locking the
>      inode. To make sure we do writeback and wait for ordered extent
>      completion as much as possible before locking the inode.
>      Remaining patches are unchanged.
> 
> V2: Added one more patch to the series, which is the first patch, that
>      fixes the bug regarding missing holes after doing a ranged fsync.
> 
>      The remaining patches remain the same, only patch 4 had a trivial
>      conflict when rebasing against patch 1 and got its changelog
>      updated. Now all fstests pass with version 2 of this patchset.
> 
> Filipe Manana (4):
>    Btrfs: fix missing file extent item for hole after ranged fsync
>    Btrfs: add helper to get the end offset of a file extent item
>    Btrfs: factor out inode items copy loop from btrfs_log_inode()
>    Btrfs: make ranged full fsyncs more efficient
> 

You can add

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>

to the whole series.  Thanks,

Josef

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-03-11 17:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-09 12:41 [PATCH v3 0/4] Btrfs: make ranged fsyncs always respect the given range fdmanana
2020-03-09 12:41 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] Btrfs: fix missing file extent item for hole after ranged fsync fdmanana
2020-03-09 12:41 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] Btrfs: add helper to get the end offset of a file extent item fdmanana
2020-03-09 12:41 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] Btrfs: factor out inode items copy loop from btrfs_log_inode() fdmanana
2020-03-09 12:41 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] Btrfs: make ranged full fsyncs more efficient fdmanana
2020-03-11 17:44 ` Josef Bacik [this message]
2020-03-12 20:33 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] Btrfs: make ranged fsyncs always respect the given range David Sterba
2020-03-13 11:01   ` Filipe Manana
2020-03-13 13:17     ` David Sterba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6fd4856c-ca48-0cca-f5e1-3208a55ea033@toxicpanda.com \
    --to=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=fdmanana@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox