public inbox for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
To: Johannes Thumshirn <Johannes.Thumshirn@wdc.com>,
	Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>,
	"linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] btrfs: small improvement for btrfs_io_context structure
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 15:31:00 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7215d466-7476-e322-e8cc-d5fd4841ce79@gmx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e776fcff-3c57-1b77-9c83-bacc0e473f5c@wdc.com>



On 2023/1/30 15:27, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> On 28.01.23 09:23, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>> @@ -5888,13 +5888,22 @@ static struct btrfs_io_context *alloc_btrfs_io_context(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_
>>   						       int total_stripes,
>>   						       int real_stripes)
>>   {
>> -	struct btrfs_io_context *bioc = kzalloc(
>> +	struct btrfs_io_context *bioc;
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * We should have valid number of stripes, larger than U16_MAX(65535)
>> +	 * indicates something totally wrong, as our on-disk format is only
>> +	 * at u16.
>> +	 */
>> +	ASSERT(total_stripes < U16_MAX && total_stripes > 0);
> 
> Shouldn't we better change 'int total_stripes' and 'int real_stripes' to u16?
> That'll imply above ASSERT()

Right, that is way better.

Thanks,
Qu

  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-30  7:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-28  8:23 [PATCH 0/3] btrfs: reduce the memory usage for replace in btrfs_io_context Qu Wenruo
2023-01-28  8:23 ` [PATCH 1/3] btrfs: simplify the @bioc argument for handle_ops_on_dev_replace() Qu Wenruo
2023-01-30  7:17   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2023-01-31 11:54   ` Anand Jain
2023-01-28  8:23 ` [PATCH 2/3] btrfs: small improvement for btrfs_io_context structure Qu Wenruo
2023-01-30  7:27   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2023-01-30  7:31     ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2023-02-02  6:28   ` Anand Jain
2023-02-02  6:47     ` Qu Wenruo
2023-02-02  9:12       ` Anand Jain
2023-02-07  2:19         ` Qu Wenruo
2023-02-03  6:19       ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-02-03  6:44         ` Qu Wenruo
2023-01-28  8:23 ` [PATCH 3/3] btrfs: use a more space efficient way to represent the source of duplicated stripes Qu Wenruo
2023-01-30  7:40   ` Johannes Thumshirn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7215d466-7476-e322-e8cc-d5fd4841ce79@gmx.com \
    --to=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
    --cc=Johannes.Thumshirn@wdc.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wqu@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox