linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
To: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] btrfs: make btrfs_free_stale_device() to iterate all stales
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 17:06:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <72509d75-b878-a349-68f8-628cc8c0d5c4@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171215034739.26090-4-anand.jain@oracle.com>



On 15.12.2017 05:47, Anand Jain wrote:
> Let the list iterator iterate further and find other stale
> devices and delete it. This is in preparation to add support
> for user land request-able stale devices cleanup.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>

What is the lock protection of this function - uuid_mutex, it's not
really obvious. Perhaps adding a lockdep_assert_held for the correct
lock ? I guess David's earlier patch to document the locking in
volumes.c might shed some light on this one.

> ---
>  fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 20 +++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> index 0e89409112d5..70db6a1d5658 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> @@ -610,19 +610,20 @@ static void pending_bios_fn(struct btrfs_work *work)
>  
>  static void btrfs_free_stale_device(struct btrfs_device *cur_dev)
>  {
> -	struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devs;
> -	struct btrfs_device *dev;
> +	struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devs, *tmp_fs_devs;
> +	struct btrfs_device *dev, *tmp_dev;
>  
>  	if (!cur_dev->name)
>  		return;
>  
> -	list_for_each_entry(fs_devs, &fs_uuids, list) {
> -		int del = 1;
> +	list_for_each_entry_safe(fs_devs, tmp_fs_devs, &fs_uuids, list) {
>  
>  		if (fs_devs->opened)
>  			continue;
>  
> -		list_for_each_entry(dev, &fs_devs->devices, dev_list) {
> +		list_for_each_entry_safe(dev, tmp_dev,
> +				         &fs_devs->devices, dev_list) {
> +			int not_found;
>  
>  			if (dev == cur_dev)
>  				continue;
> @@ -636,14 +637,12 @@ static void btrfs_free_stale_device(struct btrfs_device *cur_dev)
>  			 * either use mapper or non mapper path throughout.
>  			 */
>  			rcu_read_lock();
> -			del = strcmp(rcu_str_deref(dev->name),
> +			not_found = strcmp(rcu_str_deref(dev->name),
>  						rcu_str_deref(cur_dev->name));
>  			rcu_read_unlock();
> -			if (!del)
> -				break;
> -		}
> +			if (not_found)
> +				continue;
>  
> -		if (!del) {
>  			/* delete the stale device */
>  			if (fs_devs->num_devices == 1) {
>  				btrfs_sysfs_remove_fsid(fs_devs);
> @@ -654,7 +653,6 @@ static void btrfs_free_stale_device(struct btrfs_device *cur_dev)
>  				list_del(&dev->dev_list);
>  				free_device(dev);
>  			}
> -			break;
>  		}
>  	}
>  }
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2017-12-15 15:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-12-15  3:47 [PATCH 0/6] preparatory work to add device forget Anand Jain
2017-12-15  3:47 ` [PATCH 1/6] btrfs: cleanup btrfs_free_stale_device() usage Anand Jain
2017-12-15 15:33   ` Nikolay Borisov
2017-12-16  2:15     ` Anand Jain
2017-12-15  3:47 ` [PATCH 2/6] btrfs: no need to check for btrfs_fs_devices::seeding Anand Jain
2017-12-15  3:47 ` [PATCH 3/6] btrfs: make btrfs_free_stale_device() to iterate all stales Anand Jain
2017-12-15 15:06   ` Nikolay Borisov [this message]
2017-12-16  2:13     ` Anand Jain
2017-12-16  6:54       ` Nikolay Borisov
2017-12-15  3:47 ` [PATCH 4/6] btrfs: make btrfs_free_stale_device() argument optional Anand Jain
2017-12-15 15:07   ` Nikolay Borisov
2017-12-16  2:14     ` Anand Jain
2017-12-16  6:55       ` Nikolay Borisov
2017-12-15  3:47 ` [PATCH 5/6] btrfs: make btrfs_free_stale_device() to match the path Anand Jain
2017-12-15  3:47 ` [PATCH 6/6] btrfs: cleanup to make btrfs_free_stale_device() readable Anand Jain
2017-12-15 11:29   ` [PATCH v2 1/6] " Anand Jain
2017-12-15 13:07   ` [PATCH v2 6/6] " Anand Jain
2017-12-16  2:48   ` [PATCH v3 " Anand Jain
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-01-09 14:13 [PATCH RESEND v3 0/6] preparatory work to add device forget Anand Jain
2018-01-09 14:13 ` [PATCH 3/6] btrfs: make btrfs_free_stale_device() to iterate all stales Anand Jain
2018-01-09 16:21   ` Josef Bacik
2018-01-10  5:15 [PATCH v4 0/6] preparatory work to add device forget Anand Jain
2018-01-10  5:15 ` [PATCH 3/6] btrfs: make btrfs_free_stale_device() to iterate all stales Anand Jain
2018-01-10 15:49   ` Josef Bacik
2018-01-18 14:00 [PATCH v5 0/6] preparatory work to add device forget Anand Jain
2018-01-18 14:00 ` [PATCH 3/6] btrfs: make btrfs_free_stale_device() to iterate all stales Anand Jain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=72509d75-b878-a349-68f8-628cc8c0d5c4@suse.com \
    --to=nborisov@suse.com \
    --cc=anand.jain@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).