From: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
To: Aleksa Sarai <asarai@suse.de>, Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>,
Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>, David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: resume qgroup rescan on rw remount
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 16:12:43 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <725eb058-4fb4-a167-9ba4-a062de718555@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170704114906.8419-1-asarai@suse.de>
On 4.07.2017 14:49, Aleksa Sarai wrote:
> Several distributions mount the "proper root" as ro during initrd and
> then remount it as rw before pivot_root(2). Thus, if a rescan had been
> aborted by a previous shutdown, the rescan would never be resumed.
>
> This issue would manifest itself as several btrfs ioctl(2)s causing the
> entire machine to hang when btrfs_qgroup_wait_for_completion was hit
> (due to the fs_info->qgroup_rescan_running flag being set but the rescan
> itself not being resumed). Notably, Docker's btrfs storage driver makes
> regular use of BTRFS_QUOTA_CTL_DISABLE and BTRFS_IOC_QUOTA_RESCAN_WAIT
> (causing this problem to be manifested on boot for some machines).
>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.11+
> Cc: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
> Fixes: b382a324b60f ("Btrfs: fix qgroup rescan resume on mount")
> Signed-off-by: Aleksa Sarai <asarai@suse.de>
Indeed, looking at the code it seems that b382a324b60f ("Btrfs: fix
qgroup rescan resume on mount") missed adding the qgroup_rescan_resume
in the remount path. One thing which I couldn't verify though is whether
reading fs_info->qgroup_flags without any locking is safe from remount
context.
During remount I don't see any locks taken that prevent operations which
can modify qgroup_flags.
> ---
> fs/btrfs/super.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/super.c b/fs/btrfs/super.c
> index 6346876c97ea..ff6690389343 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/super.c
> @@ -1821,6 +1821,8 @@ static int btrfs_remount(struct super_block *sb, int *flags, char *data)
> goto restore;
> }
>
> + btrfs_qgroup_rescan_resume(fs_info);
> +
> if (!fs_info->uuid_root) {
> btrfs_info(fs_info, "creating UUID tree");
> ret = btrfs_create_uuid_tree(fs_info);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-10 13:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-04 11:49 [PATCH] btrfs: resume qgroup rescan on rw remount Aleksa Sarai
2017-07-10 13:12 ` Nikolay Borisov [this message]
2017-07-10 13:56 ` Nikolay Borisov
2017-07-11 17:03 ` David Sterba
2017-08-26 6:39 ` Aleksa Sarai
2017-08-30 10:48 ` David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=725eb058-4fb4-a167-9ba4-a062de718555@suse.com \
--to=nborisov@suse.com \
--cc=asarai@suse.de \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=jbacik@fb.com \
--cc=jeffm@suse.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).