linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mladen Milinkovic <maxrd2@smoothware.net>
To: Chris Murphy <lists@colorremedies.com>,
	"Austin S. Hemmelgarn" <ahferroin7@gmail.com>
Cc: Martin <rc6encrypted@gmail.com>,
	Btrfs BTRFS <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Recommended why to use btrfs for production?
Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2016 12:45:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <73123a36-6502-d735-c813-fce43b620e5a@smoothware.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJCQCtQ4i0PWisxi708EmrTuPHH7hNEkKfY28GjTG2s4Sk3DYQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 06/03/2016 04:05 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> Make certain the kernel command timer value is greater than the driver
> error recovery timeout. The former is found in sysfs, per block
> device, the latter can be get and set with smartctl. Wrong
> configuration is common (it's actually the default) when using
> consumer drives, and inevitably leads to problems, even the loss of
> the entire array. It really is a terrible default.

Since it's first time i've heard of this I did some googling.

Here's some nice article about these timeouts:
http://strugglers.net/~andy/blog/2015/11/09/linux-software-raid-and-drive-timeouts/comment-page-1/

And some udev rules that should apply this automatically:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.raid/48193

Cheers

-- 
Mladen Milinkovic
GPG: EF9D9B26


  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-06-05 10:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-03  9:49 Recommended why to use btrfs for production? Martin
2016-06-03  9:53 ` Marc Haber
2016-06-03  9:57   ` Martin
2016-06-03 10:01 ` Hans van Kranenburg
2016-06-03 10:15   ` Martin
2016-06-03 12:55 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2016-06-03 13:31   ` Martin
2016-06-03 13:47     ` Julian Taylor
2016-06-03 14:21     ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2016-06-03 14:39       ` Martin
2016-06-03 19:09       ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2016-06-09  6:16       ` Duncan
2016-06-09 11:38         ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2016-06-09 17:39           ` Chris Murphy
2016-06-09 19:57             ` Duncan
2016-06-03 14:05   ` Chris Murphy
2016-06-03 14:11     ` Martin
2016-06-03 15:33       ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2016-06-04  0:48         ` Nicholas D Steeves
2016-06-04  1:48           ` Chris Murphy
2016-06-06 13:29             ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2016-06-04  1:34       ` Chris Murphy
2016-06-05 10:45     ` Mladen Milinkovic [this message]
2016-06-05 16:33       ` James Johnston
2016-06-05 18:20         ` Andrei Borzenkov
2016-06-06  1:47       ` Chris Murphy
2016-06-06  2:40         ` James Johnston
2016-06-06 13:36           ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=73123a36-6502-d735-c813-fce43b620e5a@smoothware.net \
    --to=maxrd2@smoothware.net \
    --cc=ahferroin7@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lists@colorremedies.com \
    --cc=rc6encrypted@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).