From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wr1-f52.google.com (mail-wr1-f52.google.com [209.85.221.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6D6E469D for ; Tue, 10 Dec 2024 04:36:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.221.52 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1733805395; cv=none; b=qaQ/zbqPGA/IFlqdCrvR7GjmSKglMpyr9eJ7fhiPVw4ZW2cfVqz98Q7e5LqLf8eXN1+bc6UuSMP/+w6rb4oZkZfmT5LR95rJ8qLRoVeNTzrqq+I2nEJ/idsnr3N+JZmlPW+ND9ySL0h89SVlaJZD1dTanVOqc5YwoOBZoqQYqU8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1733805395; c=relaxed/simple; bh=CukTMpTMh/Gcy9w2BCwQGLdUvMeKBq4KnBviroTRtWM=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=nlRrEjI+t2hlRC+n7DOOonqtVLDRV0TGf87KiAUJ0qsULVY2P09fzhXrwlKaxmR3DXzetUNdIwOHupO98NcDaRQiY6twIho2oK5euTGDge9CNbMMZnF/557qZrLT3Ro9dz3IEg0D0AGNU+QGPy495vv55YVhLnh9NW2lZNCj/O8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=suse.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=suse.com header.i=@suse.com header.b=WHNmCrRJ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.221.52 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=suse.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=suse.com header.i=@suse.com header.b="WHNmCrRJ" Received: by mail-wr1-f52.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-38637614567so1259968f8f.3 for ; Mon, 09 Dec 2024 20:36:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=google; t=1733805390; x=1734410190; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:autocrypt:from :content-language:references:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date :message-id:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=mybaZDS1dYbzJ+XHCHgrju1KNNJQm5k1R/ukTn6u8Us=; b=WHNmCrRJZrs4WuVkGRN50C8c6RoQu8Fp+QWpdIynNY+Ic3sCYw6+k1XHF4ZIdjlyse jm31T2ZZ1v2GlL+YEH76edT80/B6Ir1feVAgstkJrnasxA7RcdJUZAujHUJDxGwB99Mb SwjhM0xTa1/kOqQ5cBzBIniOFOHtDbzV9i+wljOcpxNuR176ZtPyHYfz0ZMZukcACHf9 5hSjMhtBrImMunKxHBTglopckD6sRwp17/5iS3hxyleLgSrdbBURHHW0X9bWuwqFAp5P PuJiMveFRcQt52t5xWQkzrstl6XdR3nsoDDj2akkA+3vUbWLHlljQEMh4tlhhiJMXjWk HCQw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1733805390; x=1734410190; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:autocrypt:from :content-language:references:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date :message-id:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=mybaZDS1dYbzJ+XHCHgrju1KNNJQm5k1R/ukTn6u8Us=; b=jpw3+tZ4AiazAVFnljR5b18/0ViMwyyv04+iqI+KPv24dZb6TrdIbLYbmcWiym4oEp jjf8ESsJV60w2eIFIvsa4/eSPpajZJ/IiMUqkXdQrsJ5s2pRuWtvLWPZn2r0wj6pKQbq IJTosmpCAP8dlG7cNucBQIpcDwouRJm/7yeHFU0XIt9fO/sasZwXqyXEP0L1fB8o3RWJ sKSGVmLZIG0hehoyOrn3xWoFr5tJ+IogMOv10uOPKAUxcpLC8s1+PY9MRDGuhA2/WDyQ 6ZrXvK3LPKHNvjcYxLV/cjg+ZIr+t82Xf5sz28Y2hc3EoAQY/4d9usLu0mIpEVHKcIHK uExA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWRgItYCufK1kcuyLKuXkXpgVgSF5DWS05gfkxr2w2FVyEGbmzevNeZkOMxqxx3VWQZqIh0jczVc23XcA==@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YytlSwrDTS9oKUtnPkWP7DJbi8XxsBytV7K39eqeIdm1+m2x/TU QniWPL1vITagVYqJguqHVwVzYwIFrzCFa9oqSVBd05XlEojIUHhT1i7Kste1K2KOvkplGZY4NWs U X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncs4jlqE2ZacEHtvMNcDMLnEwvSgsHiGecE516QV+w4rjVTHRL9zOvxi774KGoo VOQllKei/W0k4JW5HXCNCr42ssc9SD4tLB5Mp1MaTqjyot0H7XMJ4uAuThKwz4RBXices0Fl+95 Vjy/RxszmCws2WkzKYbawKbt24a/8s5oywNTTxv4+Qeo/hGR7YMzQiXsBt7EkVvQ6BLi0EvbVp/ JO/yuMWiZIti7Lj1iqqJ43n02zkbu7hp+7G1velWVqi0Pn7ScMB+opkimfT49XqpfB45r13ahSn oPwtDQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFFNazwJycsttGT2yJtxqQiPxT1eND1BSgRMndbdsowGSkAPE85L1wrXLyQm8vjp0wqLZu4DA== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:5f8c:0:b0:385:e67d:9e0 with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-3862b37d51amr11256765f8f.29.1733805389544; Mon, 09 Dec 2024 20:36:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPV6:2403:580d:fda1::299? (2403-580d-fda1--299.ip6.aussiebb.net. [2403:580d:fda1::299]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d9443c01a7336-215f8f3d9c4sm80613565ad.274.2024.12.09.20.36.27 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 09 Dec 2024 20:36:29 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <74c8536a-3108-4e6c-941a-5d7b9c697862@suse.com> Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2024 15:06:25 +1030 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: Safety of raid1 vs raid10 To: Scoopta , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org References: Content-Language: en-US From: Qu Wenruo Autocrypt: addr=wqu@suse.com; keydata= xsBNBFnVga8BCACyhFP3ExcTIuB73jDIBA/vSoYcTyysFQzPvez64TUSCv1SgXEByR7fju3o 8RfaWuHCnkkea5luuTZMqfgTXrun2dqNVYDNOV6RIVrc4YuG20yhC1epnV55fJCThqij0MRL 1NxPKXIlEdHvN0Kov3CtWA+R1iNN0RCeVun7rmOrrjBK573aWC5sgP7YsBOLK79H3tmUtz6b 9Imuj0ZyEsa76Xg9PX9Hn2myKj1hfWGS+5og9Va4hrwQC8ipjXik6NKR5GDV+hOZkktU81G5 gkQtGB9jOAYRs86QG/b7PtIlbd3+pppT0gaS+wvwMs8cuNG+Pu6KO1oC4jgdseFLu7NpABEB AAHNGFF1IFdlbnJ1byA8d3F1QHN1c2UuY29tPsLAlAQTAQgAPgIbAwULCQgHAgYVCAkKCwIE FgIDAQIeAQIXgBYhBC3fcuWlpVuonapC4cI9kfOhJf6oBQJnEXVgBQkQ/lqxAAoJEMI9kfOh Jf6o+jIH/2KhFmyOw4XWAYbnnijuYqb/obGae8HhcJO2KIGcxbsinK+KQFTSZnkFxnbsQ+VY fvtWBHGt8WfHcNmfjdejmy9si2jyy8smQV2jiB60a8iqQXGmsrkuR+AM2V360oEbMF3gVvim 2VSX2IiW9KERuhifjseNV1HLk0SHw5NnXiWh1THTqtvFFY+CwnLN2GqiMaSLF6gATW05/sEd V17MdI1z4+WSk7D57FlLjp50F3ow2WJtXwG8yG8d6S40dytZpH9iFuk12Sbg7lrtQxPPOIEU rpmZLfCNJJoZj603613w/M8EiZw6MohzikTWcFc55RLYJPBWQ+9puZtx1DopW2jOwE0EWdWB rwEIAKpT62HgSzL9zwGe+WIUCMB+nOEjXAfvoUPUwk+YCEDcOdfkkM5FyBoJs8TCEuPXGXBO Cl5P5B8OYYnkHkGWutAVlUTV8KESOIm/KJIA7jJA+Ss9VhMjtePfgWexw+P8itFRSRrrwyUf E+0WcAevblUi45LjWWZgpg3A80tHP0iToOZ5MbdYk7YFBE29cDSleskfV80ZKxFv6koQocq0 vXzTfHvXNDELAuH7Ms/WJcdUzmPyBf3Oq6mKBBH8J6XZc9LjjNZwNbyvsHSrV5bgmu/THX2n g/3be+iqf6OggCiy3I1NSMJ5KtR0q2H2Nx2Vqb1fYPOID8McMV9Ll6rh8S8AEQEAAcLAfAQY AQgAJgIbDBYhBC3fcuWlpVuonapC4cI9kfOhJf6oBQJnEXWBBQkQ/lrSAAoJEMI9kfOhJf6o cakH+QHwDszsoYvmrNq36MFGgvAHRjdlrHRBa4A1V1kzd4kOUokongcrOOgHY9yfglcvZqlJ qfa4l+1oxs1BvCi29psteQTtw+memmcGruKi+YHD7793zNCMtAtYidDmQ2pWaLfqSaryjlzR /3tBWMyvIeWZKURnZbBzWRREB7iWxEbZ014B3gICqZPDRwwitHpH8Om3eZr7ygZck6bBa4MU o1XgbZcspyCGqu1xF/bMAY2iCDcq6ULKQceuKkbeQ8qxvt9hVxJC2W3lHq8dlK1pkHPDg9wO JoAXek8MF37R8gpLoGWl41FIUb3hFiu3zhDDvslYM4BmzI18QgQTQnotJH8= In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 在 2024/12/10 12:56, Scoopta 写道: > I've read online that btrfs raid10 is theoretically safer than raid1 > because raid10 groups drives together into mirrored pairs making the > filesystem more likely to successfully survive a multi-drive failure > event. It's only theoretically possible, but hardly possible in the real world. For one single RAID10 chunk, btrfs can tolerant as many as half of the devices being missing, as long as each sub stripe (the RAID1 pair) has one device standing. E.g. for chunk at bytenr X, we have 4 stripes: stripe 0 devid 1 physical X1 stripe 1 devid 2 physical X2 stripe 2 devid 3 physical X3 stripe 3 devid 4 physical X4 We can have either devid 1+3 or devid 2+4 missing, and btrfs is totally fine with that chunk. But the real problem is, one btrfs has more than 3 chunks, and normally one chunk is only 1GiB in size, so for a btrfs with 1TiB used space, it will have at least 1024 chunks. Good luck all the chunks have the same stripe layout. If there is another chunk at bytenr Y, also 4 stripes but a different layout: stripe 0 devid 1 physical Y1 stripe 1 devid 3 physical Y2 stripe 2 devid 2 physical Y3 stripe 3 devid 4 physical Y4 Then the devid 1+3 missing is fine for chunk X, but not for chunk Y. In really, the chunk layout is never ensured, and I just did the same RAID10 assumption in my btrfs-fuse project, until it failed selftest (missing two devices for a RAID10 btrfs) on a recent kernel, exactly due to the device rotation. Thanks, Qu > I can't find any documentation that says this to be the case. Is > it true that btrfs pairs drives together for raid10 but not raid1, if > this is the case what's the reasoning for it?