[PATCH] btrfs: disable bs > ps support if no transparent hugepage support

[Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>]

Btrfs relies one mapping_set_folio_order_range() to set the minimal
folio order for all its data inodes, but that function will be nop if
transparent hugepage is not enabled.

Guard the bs > ps support behind CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE, just like
all other filesystems.

Fixes: 98077f7f2180 ("btrfs: enable experimental bs > ps support")
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/Kconfig | 3 ++-
 fs/btrfs/fs.c    | 6 +++++-
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/Kconfig b/fs/btrfs/Kconfig
index 9de04c37e11a..4b10d78ed99b 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/Kconfig
+++ b/fs/btrfs/Kconfig
@@ -106,7 +106,8 @@ config BTRFS_EXPERIMENTAL
 
 	  - extent tree v2 - complex rework of extent tracking
 
-	  - block size > page size support
+	  - block size > page size support - needs transparent huge page and
+					     non-HIGHMEM system
 
 	  - huge folios for data - folios can be as large as 2MiB now
 
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/fs.c b/fs/btrfs/fs.c
index 5015d0148841..77544ee5e6db 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/fs.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/fs.c
@@ -155,8 +155,12 @@ bool __attribute_const__ btrfs_supported_blocksize(u32 blocksize)
 	 *
 	 * Considering HIGHMEM is such a pain to deal with and it's going
 	 * to be deprecated eventually, just reject HIGHMEM && bs > ps cases.
+	 *
+	 * Finally, for bs > ps cases, we need to set the minimal folio order,
+	 * which requires transparent hugepage.
 	 */
-	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HIGHMEM) && blocksize > PAGE_SIZE)
+	if (blocksize > PAGE_SIZE &&
+	    (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HIGHMEM) || !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE)))
 		return false;
 	return true;
 #endif
-- 
2.54.0