From: Dongjun Shin <djshin90@gmail.com>
To: Dmitri Nikulin <dnikulin@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ssd optimised mode
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:15:51 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7fe698080902221915w6f961227ub26abae7f57302ae@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3a7f57190902221833i61beb82u38c29dda0eaf5f42@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Dmitri Nikulin <dnikulin@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Dongjun Shin <djshin90@gmail.com> wrote:
>> A well-designed SSD should survive power cycling and should provide atomicity
>> of flush operation regardless of the underlying flash operations. I don't expect
>> that users of SSD have different requirements about atomicity.
>
> Well that's my point, it "should" provide atomicity, but is this the
> case for consumer SSDs? It is certainly NOT the case for cheap
> USB-based flash media and AFAIK not for CF either.
>
AFAIK, all enterprise and consumer SSDs have atomicity requirements
because they're designed to replace the HDD without changes to the OS.
USB or any kind of flash-based cards have different requirements.
They're optimized for cost and the priority for the atomicity is low.
Moreover, they can be plugged out without prior notice to OS.
--
Dongjun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-23 3:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-20 11:26 ssd optimised mode srimugunthan dhandapani
2009-02-20 16:01 ` Josef Bacik
2009-02-20 16:30 ` Chris Mason
2009-02-22 1:07 ` Dmitri Nikulin
2009-02-22 17:44 ` Steven Pratt
2009-02-23 1:06 ` Dmitri Nikulin
2009-02-23 1:22 ` Dongjun Shin
2009-02-23 2:33 ` Dmitri Nikulin
2009-02-23 3:15 ` Dongjun Shin [this message]
2009-02-23 3:17 ` Seth Huang
2009-02-23 4:01 ` Dmitri Nikulin
2009-02-23 9:31 ` Oliver Mattos
2009-02-23 16:40 ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-02-23 16:48 ` Claudio Martins
2009-02-23 17:23 ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-02-23 14:33 ` Chris Mason
2009-02-24 0:16 ` Dmitri Nikulin
2009-02-24 0:35 ` Dongjun Shin
2009-02-24 2:32 ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-02-24 3:53 ` Dmitri Nikulin
2009-02-24 4:09 ` Dongjun Shin
2009-02-24 4:10 ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-02-24 4:23 ` Dmitri Nikulin
2009-02-23 22:19 ` Wes Felter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7fe698080902221915w6f961227ub26abae7f57302ae@mail.gmail.com \
--to=djshin90@gmail.com \
--cc=dnikulin@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox