From: Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo@wpkg.org>
To: linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: btrfs RAID-1 vs md RAID-1?
Date: Sun, 15 May 2016 19:24:47 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <83719f27dd5cdc406fd3fd24e7b82a9f@admin.virtall.com> (raw)
I'm trying to read two large files in parallel from a 2-disk RAID-1
btrfs setup (using kernel 4.5.3).
According to iostat, one of the disks is 100% saturated, while the other
disk is around 0% busy.
Is it expected?
With two readers from the same disk, each file is being read with ~50
MB/s from disk (with just one reader from disk, the speed goes up to
around ~150 MB/s).
In md RAID, with many readers, it will try to distribute the reads -
after md manual on http://linux.die.net/man/4/md:
Raid1
(...)
Data is read from any one device. The driver attempts to distribute
read requests across all devices
to maximise performance.
Raid5
(...)
This also allows more parallelism when reading, as read requests are
distributed over all the devices
in the array instead of all but one.
Are there any plans to improve this is btrfs?
Tomasz Chmielewski
http://wpkg.org
next reply other threads:[~2016-05-15 10:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-15 10:24 Tomasz Chmielewski [this message]
2016-05-15 12:07 ` btrfs RAID-1 vs md RAID-1? Anand Jain
2016-05-15 20:40 ` Duncan
2016-05-15 23:29 ` Kai Krakow
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=83719f27dd5cdc406fd3fd24e7b82a9f@admin.virtall.com \
--to=mangoo@wpkg.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).