From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr0-f174.google.com ([209.85.128.174]:33740 "EHLO mail-wr0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750866AbdH1MDu (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Aug 2017 08:03:50 -0400 Received: by mail-wr0-f174.google.com with SMTP id k94so1074976wrc.0 for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2017 05:03:49 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: deleted subvols don't go away? To: Christoph Anton Mitterer , "Janos Toth F." Cc: Btrfs BTRFS References: <1503854146.5155.2.camel@scientia.net> <1503907621.1671.5.camel@scientia.net> From: Nikolay Borisov Message-ID: <83c6b0bb-a120-e0e3-dfc3-069ede63906f@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 15:03:47 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1503907621.1671.5.camel@scientia.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 28.08.2017 11:07, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > Thanks... > > Still a bit strange that it displays that entry... especially with a > generation that seems newer than what I thought was the actually last > generation on the fs. Snapshot destroy is a 2-phase process. The first phase deletes just the root references. After it you see what you've described. Then, later, when the cleaner thread runs again the snapshot's root item is going to be deleted for good and you no longer will see it. > > Cheers, > Chris. >