From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Richard Guenther" Subject: Re: [patch] measurements, numbers about CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING=y impact Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 20:10:20 +0100 Message-ID: <84fc9c000901091110n2f5565b7mecf9acec35cf5a0@mail.gmail.com> References: <20090109153508.GA4671@elte.hu> <20090109084620.3c711aad@infradead.org> <20090109172011.GD26290@one.firstfloor.org> <20090109172801.GC6936@parisc-linux.org> <20090109174719.GG26290@one.firstfloor.org> <20090109173914.GD6936@parisc-linux.org> <20090109181952.GI26290@one.firstfloor.org> <84fc9c000901091059v65265413wda053d3ce5b0d17a@mail.gmail.com> <20090109192158.GK26290@one.firstfloor.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: "Linus Torvalds" , "Matthew Wilcox" , "Dirk Hohndel" , "H. Peter Anvin" , "Ingo Molnar" , "jim owens" , "Chris Mason" , "Peter Zijlstra" , "Steven Rostedt" , paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, "Gregory Haskins" , "Andrew Morton" , "Linux Kernel Mailing List" , linux-fsdevel , linux-btrfs , "Thomas Gleixner" , "Nick Piggin" , "Peter Morreale" , "Sven Dietrich" , jh@suse.cz To: "Andi Kleen" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20090109192158.GK26290@one.firstfloor.org> List-ID: On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 8:21 PM, Andi Kleen wrote: >> GCC 4.3 should be good in compiling the >> kernel with default -Os settings. > > It's unfortunately not. It doesn't inline a lot of simple asm() inlines > for example. Reading Ingos posting with the actual numbers states the opposite. Richard.