From: Christian Zangl <coralllama@gmail.com>
To: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: "missing data block" when converting ext4 to btrfs
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 09:22:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8678a4f9-3388-5a7b-00cc-8b9da6a0a6e8@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46ea54ea-3ed3-f1b7-7314-a69f4195c8f9@gmx.com>
On 2020-07-14 12:10, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
>
> On 2020/7/14 下午5:33, Christian Zangl wrote:
>> On 2020-07-14 10:09, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2020/7/14 下午3:58, Christian Zangl wrote:
>>>> On 2020-07-14 08:10, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2020/7/14 上午3:46, Christian Zangl wrote:
>>>>>> I am on a test VM where I am trying to convert a second disk to btrfs.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The conversion fails with the error missing data block for bytenr
>>>>>> 1048576 (see below).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I couldn't find any information about the error. What can I do to fix
>>>>>> this?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> $ fsck -f /dev/sdb1
>>>>>> fsck from util-linux 2.35.2
>>>>>> e2fsck 1.45.6 (20-Mar-2020)
>>>>>> Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes
>>>>>> Pass 2: Checking directory structure
>>>>>> Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity
>>>>>> Pass 4: Checking reference counts
>>>>>> Pass 5: Checking group summary information
>>>>>> /dev/sdb1: 150510/4194304 files (0.5% non-contiguous),
>>>>>> 2726652/16777216
>>>>>> blocks
>>>>>>
>>>>>> $ btrfs-convert /dev/sdb1
>>>>>> create btrfs filesystem:
>>>>>> blocksize: 4096
>>>>>> nodesize: 16384
>>>>>> features: extref, skinny-metadata (default)
>>>>>> checksum: crc32c
>>>>>> creating ext2 image file
>>>>>> ERROR: missing data block for bytenr 1048576
>>>>>> ERROR: failed to create ext2_saved/image: -2
>>>>>> WARNING: an error occurred during conversion, filesystem is partially
>>>>>> created but not finalized and not mountable
>>>>>
>>>>> Can btrfs-convert -r rollback the fs?
>>>>
>>>> No:
>>>>
>>>> $ sudo btrfs-convert -r /dev/sdb1
>>>> No valid Btrfs found on /dev/sdb1
>>>> ERROR: unable to open ctree
>>>> ERROR: rollback failed
>>>>
>>>> If I do `fsck -f /dev/sdb1` I get lots of errors:
>>>>
>>>> t-arch:~$ sudo fsck -f /dev/sdb1
>>>> fsck from util-linux 2.35.2
>>>> e2fsck 1.45.6 (20-Mar-2020)
>>>> Resize inode not valid. Recreate<y>? yes
>>>> Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes
>>>> Deleted inode 3681 has zero dtime. Fix<y>? yes
>>>> Inodes that were part of a corrupted orphan linked list found.
>>>> Fix<y>? yes
>>>> Inode 3744 was part of the orphaned inode list. FIXED.
>>>> Deleted inode 3745 has zero dtime. Fix<y>? yes
>>>> Inode 3747 has INLINE_DATA_FL flag on filesystem without inline data
>>>> support.
>>>> Clear<y>? yes
>>>> Inode 3748 was part of the orphaned inode list. FIXED.
>>>> Inode 3748 has a extra size (6144) which is invalid
>>>> Fix<y>? yes
>>>> Inode 3751 is in use, but has dtime set. Fix<y>? yes
>>>> Inode 3751 has imagic flag set. Clear<y>? yes
>>>> Inode 3752 was part of the orphaned inode list. FIXED.
>>>> Inode 3753 was part of the orphaned inode list. FIXED.
>>>> Inode 3754 is in use, but has dtime set. Fix<y>? yes
>>>> Inode 3755 was part of the orphaned inode list. FIXED.
>>>> Inode 3755 has imagic flag set. Clear ('a' enables 'yes' to all)
>>>> <y>? yes
>>>> Deleted inode 3801 has zero dtime. Fix ('a' enables 'yes' to all) <y>?
>>>> ...
>>>
>>> This sounds like the cause.
>>>
>>> As btrfs completely rely on the used space reported from ext*, and if
>>> the fs is corrupted, then a lot of things can go wrong.
>>
>> No, maybe you missed it but I did a fsck before the convert (see above).
>> It reported no errors.
>>
>> Only after the failed btrfs-convert I get the errors.
>>
>>
>>>>
>>>>> If you can rollback, would you provide the ext4 fs image?
>>>>
>>>> You mean the vmdk from VMware? I do have a backup.
>>>
>>> Would you mind to run e2fsck on the backup first to see if that's the
>>> problem?
>>
>> The backup has no fsck issues.
>>
>>> If the fixed fs can not pass btrfs-convert still, would you mind to send
>>> the fs image?
>>
>> How/where would you like me to send it?
>
> Does Google driver work for you?
I sent it to you.
Thanks, Christian
> Thanks,
> Qu
>>
>> Thanks, Christian
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Qu
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>>
>>>> Christian
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Qu
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> $ uname -a
>>>>>> Linux t-arch 5.7.7-arch1-1 #1 SMP PREEMPT Wed, 01 Jul 2020 14:53:16
>>>>>> +0000 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>>>>>>
>>>>>> $ btrfs --version
>>>>>> btrfs-progs v5.7
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-15 7:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-13 19:46 "missing data block" when converting ext4 to btrfs Christian Zangl
2020-07-14 6:10 ` Qu Wenruo
2020-07-14 7:58 ` Christian Zangl
2020-07-14 8:09 ` Qu Wenruo
2020-07-14 9:33 ` Christian Zangl
2020-07-14 10:10 ` Qu Wenruo
2020-07-15 7:22 ` Christian Zangl [this message]
2020-07-20 12:56 ` Qu Wenruo
2020-07-20 19:33 ` Christian Zangl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8678a4f9-3388-5a7b-00cc-8b9da6a0a6e8@gmail.com \
--to=coralllama@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox