Linux Btrfs filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
To: "Massimo B." <massimo.b@gmx.net>,
	linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: I/O blocked after booting
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2024 06:53:52 +1030	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <874a2dc5-191f-4e20-9f18-998a107b09a5@gmx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <94addf02f0eac5e5f402f48f41d16cb80d17470b.camel@gmx.net>



在 2024/3/29 01:25, Massimo B. 写道:
> On Thu, 2024-03-28 at 11:39 +0100, Massimo B. wrote:
>
>> Mar 28 11:38:26 [kernel] [14826.740669] BTRFS warning (device dm-0): failed to
>> trim 698 block group(s), last error -512
>> Mar 28 11:38:26 [kernel] [14826.741731] BTRFS warning (device dm-0): failed to
>> trim 1 device(s), last error -512
>
>
> I have set nodiscard now on all my btrfs on SSDs...
> For not rebooting I did  mount -o remount,nodiscard /
> and I see in the syslog: turning off async discard

I mean you should not do any fstrim/discard to see if everything works
fine first.

This is to make sure the problem is really from the trim/discard part.

Thanks,
Qu
>
>   Eventhough fstrim was finishing one time with
> /: 157,3 GiB (168907370496 bytes) trimmed on /dev/mapper/luks-6745....
>
> ... now running again, it does not return, and in the syslog I see:
> [kernel] BTRFS warning (device dm-0): failed to trim 143 block group(s), last
> error -512
>
> dmsetup table
> shows allow_discards on that device.
>
>
> Again I did  mount -o remount,nodiscard /
>
> But this time I don't see in the syslog  "turning off async discard"   so it
> seems to be still disabled.
>
> grep " / " /proc/mounts
> shows nothing about discard or nodiscard in the options.
>
> What can I do about that failed to trim?
> I have tried this on different disks like
>
> Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB NVMe
> and
> Samsung SSD 860 EVO 1TB SATA
>
> Trying again after the failed to trim, I got it finished again with
> 156,8 GiB (168413265920 bytes) trimmed
>
> Should fstrim be fast if it was just finished some minutes before? Why there are
> again more than 100GiB to be trimmed shortly after the last run?
>
> Is there anything broken with the trim on these devices?
>
> Best regards,
> Massimo

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-03-28 20:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-21 13:13 I/O blocked after booting Massimo B.
2024-03-28  8:36 ` HAN Yuwei
2024-03-28 10:10 ` Qu Wenruo
2024-03-28 10:39   ` Massimo B.
2024-03-28 14:55     ` Massimo B.
2024-03-28 17:24       ` Roman Mamedov
2024-03-28 20:23       ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2024-06-14  8:32         ` Massimo B.
2024-06-14 21:57           ` Qu Wenruo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=874a2dc5-191f-4e20-9f18-998a107b09a5@gmx.com \
    --to=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=massimo.b@gmx.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox