From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: btrfs loses 32-bit application compatibility after a while
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2023 10:09:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87cz0w1bd0.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> (raw)
As far as I can tell, btrfs assigns inode numbers sequentially using
this function:
int btrfs_get_free_objectid(struct btrfs_root *root, u64 *objectid)
{
int ret;
mutex_lock(&root->objectid_mutex);
if (unlikely(root->free_objectid >= BTRFS_LAST_FREE_OBJECTID)) {
btrfs_warn(root->fs_info,
"the objectid of root %llu reaches its highest value",
root->root_key.objectid);
ret = -ENOSPC;
goto out;
}
*objectid = root->free_objectid++;
ret = 0;
out:
mutex_unlock(&root->objectid_mutex);
return ret;
}
Even after deletion of the object, inode numbers are never reused.
This is a problem because after creating and deleting two billion files,
the 31-bit inode number space is exhausted. (Not sure if negative inode
numbers are a thing, so there could be one extra bit.) From that point
onwards, future files will end up with an inode number that cannot be
represented with the non-LFS interfaces (stat, getdents, etc.), causing
system calls to fail with EOVERFLOW.
For ABI reasons, we can't switch everything to 64-bit ino_t and LFS
interfaces. (If we could recompile, we wouldn't still be using 32-bit
software.)
So far, we have seen this on our 32-bit Koji builders, which create and
delete many, many files. But I suspect end users will encounter it
eventually, too.
It seems to me that the on-disk format already allows range searches on
inode numbers (see btrfs_init_root_free_objectid), so maybe this could
be used to find a sufficiently large unused range to allocate from.
Thanks,
Florian
next reply other threads:[~2023-07-13 8:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-13 8:09 Florian Weimer [this message]
2023-07-15 7:55 ` btrfs loses 32-bit application compatibility after a while Goffredo Baroncelli
2023-07-15 9:09 ` Neal Gompa
2023-07-15 9:30 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2023-07-16 9:01 ` Florian Weimer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87cz0w1bd0.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com \
--to=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox