From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
To: "litaibaichina@gmail.com" <litaibaichina@gmail.com>,
"linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: btrfsck out of memory for big fs
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2018 13:52:22 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87d763ed-147a-e5fb-e596-74f63c9dfbbd@gmx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2018081713260089574410@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2693 bytes --]
On 2018/8/17 下午1:26, litaibaichina@gmail.com wrote:
> thanks Qu.
> I am runing 4.12.
> /# btrfs --version
> btrfs-progs v4.12
>
> Do you think btrfsck can fix the fs issue ?
Nope, transid is pretty tricky especially for super old corruption.
> Or we better backup data and re-do the fs ?
I'd recommend to backup data asap.
Thanks,
Qu
>
> ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
> From: Qu Wenruo
> Date: 2018-08-17 12:34
> To: litaibaichina@gmail.com; linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: btrfsck out of memory for big fs
>
>
> On 2018/8/17 上午10:44, litaibaichina@gmail.com wrote:
>> Hi Guys,
>>
>> I had a big btrfs on a md device, it be mounted , but after a while it will become ready only:
>> # btrfs fi df /data/
>> Data, single: total=24.46TiB, used=24.46TiB
>> System, DUP: total=8.00MiB, used=2.59MiB
>> System, single: total=4.00MiB, used=0.00B
>> Metadata, DUP: total=81.00GiB, used=79.71GiB
>> Metadata, single: total=8.00MiB, used=0.00B
>> GlobalReserve, single: total=512.00MiB, used=264.28MiB
>>
>> # dmesg -T
>> [Thu Aug 16 18:16:31 2018] BTRFS error (device md127): parent transid verify failed on 26603622694912 wanted 185320 found 207817
>> [Thu Aug 16 18:16:31 2018] BTRFS error (device md127): parent transid verify failed on 26603622694912 wanted 185320 found 207817
>
> Transaction id mismatch, normally this means some of the fs is already
> corrupted before.
>
> And considering the transid gap, the corruption happened quite a long
> time ago.
>
>> [Thu Aug 16 18:16:31 2018] BTRFS warning (device md127): Skipping commit of aborted transaction.
>> [Thu Aug 16 18:16:31 2018] BTRFS: error (device md127) in cleanup_transaction:1864: errno=-5 IO failure
>> [Thu Aug 16 18:16:31 2018] BTRFS info (device md127): forced readonly
>> [Thu Aug 16 18:16:31 2018] BTRFS info (device md127): delayed_refs has NO entry
>>
>> I want to use btrfsck to check it, but it will OOM :
>> # btrfsck /dev/md127
>> Checking filesystem on /dev/md127
>> UUID: 6b87a52f-9a5f-4d03-b345-9d954c2ce259
>> checking extents
>> Killed
>>
>> I am trying to use lowmem mode, but as I tried before, it may OOM too, any ideas ?
>
> This depends on which version you tried before.
>
> Lowmem mode used to do partial lowmem and partial normal mode check, and
> normal mode caused the OOM.
>
> Latest lowmem mode should not cause OOM, but please ger ready for the
> super long run time.
>
> Thanks,
> Qu
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-17 8:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-17 2:44 btrfsck out of memory for big fs litaibaichina
2018-08-17 4:34 ` Qu Wenruo
[not found] ` <2018081713260089574410@gmail.com>
2018-08-17 5:52 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87d763ed-147a-e5fb-e596-74f63c9dfbbd@gmx.com \
--to=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=litaibaichina@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).