From: "Miquel Sabaté Solà" <mssola@mssola.com>
To: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, clm@fb.com, dsterba@suse.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: Prevent open-coded arithmetic in kmalloc
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2025 10:00:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ecrx4mzv.fsf@> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250923070045.GU5333@twin.jikos.cz> (David Sterba's message of "Tue, 23 Sep 2025 09:00:46 +0200")
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1558 bytes --]
David Sterba @ 2025-09-23 09:00 +02:
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2025 at 08:47:35AM +0200, Miquel Sabaté Solà wrote:
>> David Sterba @ 2025-09-23 08:13 +02:
>>
>> > On Mon, Sep 22, 2025 at 02:47:13PM +0200, Miquel Sabaté Solà wrote:
>> >> Hello,
>> >>
>> >> David Sterba @ 2025-09-22 12:28 +02:
>> >>
>> >> > On Fri, Sep 19, 2025 at 04:58:15PM +0200, Miquel Sabaté Solà wrote:
>> >> >> As pointed out in the documentation, calling 'kmalloc' with open-coded
>> >> >> arithmetic can lead to unfortunate overflows and this particular way of
>> >> >> using it has been deprecated. Instead, it's preferred to use
>> >> >> 'kmalloc_array' in cases where it might apply so an overflow check is
>> >> >> performed.
>> >> >
>> >> > So this is an API cleanup and it makes sense to use the checked
>> >> > multiplication but it should be also said that this is not fixing any
>> >> > overflow because in all cases the multipliers are bounded small numbers
>> >> > derived from number of items in leaves/nodes.
>> >>
>> >> Yes, it's just an API cleanup and I don't think it fixes any current bug
>> >> in the code base. So no need to CC stable or anything like that.
>> >
>> > Still the changelog should say explicitly that it's not a bug fix before
>> > somebody assigns a CVE to it because it mentions overflow.
>>
>> Got it! I will submit a v2 and make this more explicit.
>
> No need to, I've updated the changelog at commit time.
Ah, then ignore the v2 patch set I've just sent, which simply changes
the commit log as you suggested.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 897 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-23 8:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-19 14:58 [PATCH 0/2] btrfs: Prevent open-coded arithmetic on kmalloc Miquel Sabaté Solà
2025-09-19 14:58 ` [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: Prevent open-coded arithmetic in kmalloc Miquel Sabaté Solà
2025-09-22 10:28 ` David Sterba
2025-09-22 12:47 ` Miquel Sabaté Solà
2025-09-23 6:13 ` David Sterba
2025-09-23 6:47 ` Miquel Sabaté Solà
2025-09-23 7:00 ` David Sterba
2025-09-23 8:00 ` Miquel Sabaté Solà [this message]
2025-09-19 14:58 ` [PATCH 2/2] btrfs: Prefer using the __free cleanup attribute Miquel Sabaté Solà
2025-09-22 10:34 ` [PATCH 0/2] btrfs: Prevent open-coded arithmetic on kmalloc David Sterba
2025-09-22 12:51 ` Miquel Sabaté Solà
2025-09-23 6:11 ` David Sterba
2025-09-23 6:46 ` Miquel Sabaté Solà
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ecrx4mzv.fsf@ \
--to=mssola@mssola.com \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).